I'm no expert in Latin but I have doubts about this one.
>>3194829
lmao google translate never works for latin
excedere- to depart; to die; to withdraw
t. took AP Latin
>>3195281
Notice how Google thinks "Overkill" is a Latin word.
Friendly reminder that this is a picture of one of the greatest statesmen of all time, and anything that may have gone wrong during his time as chancellor was Wilhelm II's fault
All hail the Iron Chancellor
>I hate krauts who disagree with me but I hate other countries even more
wow, what a profound statement.
Tell me about the Punto Fijo. Was it really better for Venezuela?
There's no way they could've gone all the way to the Channel, r-right?
>>3194606
Something had to give, even if Ogedei lived another decade or so
How did infantry tactics change from the Franco-Prussian war to the Russo-Japanese war?
bump
>>3194435
As far as I can tell machine guns and trenches played a much more important roll in the Russo-Japanese war
>We will never experience the year 2100
I want to know how humanity evolves man :(
Average longevity would only need to go up by 25% for the average millennial shitter posting here to see the next century.
>*dives out of the sun above you*
>pssssh...nothin personnel Tommy...
WW2 aircraft thread. Please don't let this devolve into a pissing match too quickly.
>>3194947
*warcrimes you*
Most aesthetic 109
How did Spain go from the greatest Empire on Earth to a shitty tourist destination for lower-middle class Northern Europeans? Can this happen to the UK too?
>>3194222
No, UK is a shit tourist destination compared to Spen.
>>3194222
Spend all their spoils on ebin buildings and luxury instead of investment. They also viewed these colonies as a buffet, instead of developing them. So, no, it won't happen to Britain.
>>3194222
A hilarious lack of economic forsight. Even at their absolute height they were still declaring bankruptcy left and right, it was embarrassing for the other empires of the time to realize that somehow, this embarrassment managed to rival them in power albeit very briefly.
How would you change your language's orthography (i.e. alphabet, spelling rules, etc) if you were given the chance to reform it?
For instance, my native language is Arabic, and I would first:
・Add پ as a letter to represent the foreign sound /v/ [See ڤ for note]
・Establish ج as /g/ (as like in Egyptian Arabic, but in contrast to most other modern dialects which instead pronounce that letter as a j-type sound) [Rationale for this change is that /g/ is the original sound value for the phoneme, and is the sound found in pre-classical Old Arabic, as well as in a a small number of modern dialects (most notably Cairene Egyptian)]
・Add چ as a letter to represent /d͡ʒ/ (i.e. the English "j") [This is the current usage of the letter in Egyptian Arabic.]
・Add ژ as a letter to represent the foreign sound /ʒ/ (i.e. the French J) [Letter and sound value taken from Persian]
・Add ڤ as a letter to represent the foreign sound /p/ [The normal Arabic ف /f/ was in Pre-Arabic a /p/, so I find it better to use a variant of the ف /f/ letter rather than the ب /b/ letter to represent /p/. Hence why I suggested ڤ as /p/, and پ as /v/.]
・Would also make two special diacritics to represent foreign vowels /e/ and /o/
Then of course, I would make writing short vowels mandatory. I would also make all intervocalic glottal stops written with a full ء all the time rather than the current shenanigans.
Was it autism?
>outnumber Lee two to one
>don't commit proper forces in proper areas
>manage to save face by the grace of Burnside
>still hold the line even when newly arrived fresh troops push Burnside back
>force Lee to retreat from Maryland
>don't pursue into Virginia and let Lee completely reorganize with zero interference
>>3194019
my dude got cucked by Lee
Quick /his/! I need maps of Asia, east Asia, china, and Japan. Preferably one similar to pic related. I'm studying Asian geography for a personal project.
Anybody have opinions on this guy's book?
Why did Romans and Greeks made such short swords?
Did they fear the longsword warrior?
>>3194678
Longer swords are heavier, require more material (hence more expensive), and more room to use them.
You might fear a longswordsman one-on-one, but if you've got a buddy with another short sword and shields to boot, you probably wouldn't.
im guessing that
>relied on spears as the primary weapon during warfare as they valued the unit as a whole over the individual soldier
>sword was only a backup when spear wasn't available
>light, easy to carry with one hand while armed with a shield
t. person who doesn't really know a lot about history
>>3194678
Meds are manlets, only Germanics and Celts could handle long swords. Few know this!
How historically accurate is this movie?
Did you like it?
Are there more movies like it?
Who decided to index the bible, why did they do it, and how did they all agree on what was to be indexed?