Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1765. page

Nah.

>>7981120
Bijection: one to one and onto

Find me where that supposed bijection would map the 4 dimensional row vector (1,5,3,10) in 1 dimensional space.

>>7981130
I don't remember the bijection, but one certainly exists. Look it up.

OP, dimension and cardinality aren't related.

>>7980977
fracture, fracture, displacement, fracture, subluxed(displacement), fracture fracture fracture

wew

doesn't sound good, a fracture is the breaking of a bone without it being fully displaced, but it sounds like you have some displacement too

go to a fucking doctor you madman

Yes, surgery most definitely needed. That is fucked, to use a technical term.

>PLEASE TELL ME I DONT HAVE TO SPEND MONEY
Nah just walk it off retard

>>7980943
Yes, as information.

File: download.jpg (349KB, 968x580px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 968x580px

>>7980943
no, we have only the simulation of ideas.

everything is preordained and we are experiencing reality like someone hooked up to a tv, thoughts are broadcast into our mind and we think they come form us but really it's just the universe operating around us.

everything is a program and nothing is real

the matrix has you

>>7980949
Then where are the glitches

>>7980809
>normies
>mediocre
You answered your own question

>>7980809

What does it feel like to criticise people who've achieved more than you for being mediocre? And what does that make you?

>>7980820
mediocre comparatively to other scientific pioneers, the way people go on about him would make you think he was a cut above the rest, but he isn't'

>>7980792
How does one become a better thinker?

>>7980792

You're saying the majority of billionaires and 30-millionaires are brainlets?

>>7982314

DELETE THIS

>>7980723
If you walk at 3.2 m/s, your image walks at -3.2 m/s, so relative to you, your image is moving towards you at (3.2 - (-3.2))m/s, or 6.4 m/s.

File: Grizzly-bear.gif (154KB, 580x386px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 580x386px

GODDAMN RACOON POSTERS GET OFF MUH BOARD

>>7980744
Ah. I was thinking in absolute terms measuring from the surface of the mirror. Ie the image is walking 3.2 towards the mirror.

Goddamn a lot of physics is about getting into the right frame of reference.

>>7980713
From what navier stokes simulations?

>>7980713
Matplotlib feather.
Are the results of the simulation outputted as a matrix?

>>7980540
>If I rephrase the Monty Hall problem, maybe people will think it's fresh bait!

Sorry, man, you can't just revive stale bait like that. Sure, you'll get bites, but they'll be the same boring nerdfights as usual.

>>7980549
The other one is different because you have already picked one.

>>7980549
I'm sure this thread is gonna get hundreds of replies, just like all the other monty hall threads.
/sci/ has really gone downhill.

>>7980329
[math]E[L]=\sum_il_ip(l_i)[/math]
Work out collisions between the lengths of all sets, then write a little program to do this little teensy sum and you'll have your answer.

>>7980329
Why are you saying union of? The union is just going to be a set of 50000 numbers from that range. Are you meaning length as in how many digits the number is expected to have? In that case, the expectation of the length is just
[math]50000E[L_{one\ number}][/math]
The expected number from the range (1, 1,000,000) is 500000.5. If we're going with integers the digit length is 6.

The answer to your question is then [math]6\cdot 50000=300000[/math]

>>7980347
The collisions are the hard part.

>>7980391
When I'm saying "union of", I mean the definition of the union operation in set theory. To clarify, each set of 500 numbers has no duplicates (it's a set). But there may be duplicates between sets. So when you combine all the sets, the total length will only be 50000 in the rare case that in 50000 trials not one duplicate was generated (the other extreme being each of the 100 sets being identical, giving a length of 500). I'm looking for the formula to calculate the average length.

>>7980279
boylover69

Westernwarriorkkk1488

Analbandit666

>>7980131
:) yes

>>7980138
Did I just disprove Einstein then?

>>7980131
I just tried this with putting 2 flaslights towards eachother

Can confirm that it didnt go faster OP

Dirty hippie

File: kim(1).jpg (61KB, 634x634px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 634x634px

Kim is best waifu.

File: kimwaifu.jpg (197KB, 470x588px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 470x588px

Long live Kim Waifu.

you can't prove her wrong because that's an opinion

tell her that shes a fucking woman

>>7979733
tell her she's fucking retarded and ask what she thinks an economist will do with money.
>>7979763
Opinions can be wrong. That's what being wrong is.
>>7979765
yes do this.

If you're using copper wire you're gonna have a bad time because it has minuscule resistivity. The setup would only be useful for a constantan wire etc. If you really want to do it with copper you'll need to coil it in some way to get good results.

>>7979739
Thats what i figured. Im trying to prove it has the least resistivity. I also tested aluminum the same way and got .708 volts. Would the numbers im getting be acceptable?

>>7979716
what is your ammeter measuring?

>>7979583
It's hard to do good in memorization classes once you get past 25

>>7979583
>could I have damaged my brain?
Yeah, drugs can have that effect. They can also help reverse the same effects, but nobody really has the means to study psychedelic rehabilitation. I'd advise you not to experiment on your own, but it probably doesn't make much of a difference now anyway.

>>7979583
I'm sure that when you were younger you were more active physically and mentally, after you gained information you moved on to another idea/topic to look into or understand. Do you try to learn something new or expose yourself as much as you used?