Why can this shit dissolve anything?
27 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7985864
>Strong bonds
>Non-polar
What were you expecting?
>>
>>7985869
What are some other chemicals that have similar solvent properties
Also
>carbonyl
>non-polar
>>
>>7985869
>non polar
How so?
File: beating dead horse.gif (129KB, 300x232px) Image search:
[Google]
129KB, 300x232px
Is it true that 1 - .99 repeating is zero?
43 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Yep.
>>
>>7985559
nope, since it still holds a value it cannot be zero. Zero has no value.
>>
>>7985572
wrong
File: download.jpg (299KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
299KB, 1000x667px
Why is western culture obsessed with irony?
30 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
because its funny
>>
boards.4chan.org/lit
>>
>>7984988
Because its a sophisticated form of humour and the west is a sophisticated culture?
2005 Nobel Laureate in chemistry, Richard Schrock, is speaking at my uni today. What should I ask him in the off chance I get to approach him?
34 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
Why did you choose a meme field instead of physics?
>>
>>7982794
Good meme question.
>>
>>7982791
"If you're so smart, why don't you post on /sci/ where the true geniuses are?
File: diagonal proof.gif (6KB, 225x242px) Image search:
[Google]
6KB, 225x242px
Hey /sci/. I'm having a hard time with getting intuition on why Cantor's Diagonal Proof is correct.
Does anyone know why I couldn't use the reasoning of this proof, replacing a Natural Number set analogue in place of the Real Number set and then use Cantor's reasoning (with the difference of numbers residing to the left of the decimal point and the list range being 1 to +ing) to claim that my Natural Number set analogue is uncountably infinite?
I don't want to rehash the Diagonal Proof, but I hope my question makes sense to mathbros.
104 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7978273
edit>> "...with list range being 1 to +inf.."
>>
>>7978273
i thought because the real numbers can not be displayed as such a set of sets
isn't that the point of the proof?
>>
>>7978273
In cantours proof, the list of all numbers is supposedly Aleph Null in size, every number has a natural number assigned to it (S1,S2,Sn etc)
Just to make sure, you ask why it won't work for a list that is size Aleph right?
Anyway the proof works because there are Aleph Null digits in the decimal expression. That's the crux of the proof.
You can match a natural number for every S and therefor an index in the decimal expression for every S, because both are Aleph Null in size. Then you can use the neat trick with constructing a new number.
If the list of nums would be Aleph in size, you wouldn't be able to match a digit for every S, and the proof falls apart. It only works when you assume the number of real numbers=the number or digits in the decimal expression.
Hope this helps.
File: Hubble Ultra Deep Field.jpg (388KB, 1280x1285px) Image search:
[Google]
388KB, 1280x1285px
The fact that the observable universe is expanding at an accelerating rate had always baffled me. Surely gravity demanded that the rate of expansion decrease over time, or if the distances between galaxies were so great then the expansion rate might be static.
We seem to live in a universe in which nothing occurs in isolation. If you find one ant, you will find billions. One christian, billions, one galaxy, billions.
So it seems reasonable to infer that if we find one big bang giving rise to one universe, we should expect to find billions.
And if we are indeed surrounded by billions of other universes, presently undetectable due to their remoteness, we should expect that gigantic mass to exert its gravitational influence by pulling our universe apart at an increasing rate.
Yes.
Yes?
31 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7985347
No. The universe, as far as we know, could be open and infinite, then the other universes could not exert any force since they cannot be in the same dimensional space. If not, gravity should be able to propagate in other dimensions. Even in that case we should detect some anomaly in the mass distribution in the universe, which we have not so far (Just black matter, but well, this is well beyond speculation)
>>
>>7985347
Yeah yeah, you could come up with as much bullshit as you'd like... or you could go to a fucking university and study actual physics so you stop making retarded threads like this.
>>
>>7985368
why so angry?
Do you have friends you work on problems with? I'm specifically thinking of math, because that's what I do and what I want, but I'm just wondering about the intersection of other peoples' social lives and math/sci.
If you have math/sci friends, did you meet them in university? At work? I feel like there's not a single way to meet a math/sci friend outside of that.
Describe your get-togethers, do you work on problems? Have you worked on a recent problem with a friend in your garage with a cool whiteboard and workstation?
:(
47 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>tfw want a friend like this but feel like anyone around has too much of a life to reciprocate
>>
/sci/ doesn't get to bring friends
>>
>>7984500
I have a friend that I discuss problems with pretty much every day but we're both EEs. I also get together with a bunch of coursemates every now and then to go over stuff.
This mostly involves meeting in the library and chatting about bits that are complicated/not covered well. Usually the person who understands it best explains it to everyone on the whiteboard and then we collectively solve problems. Sometimes we go over problem sheets and shit as well.
I do study a lot of pure mathematics in my own time but I don't have anyone to discuss it with. That said, I think of maths as a solitary pursuit so I'm not sure I'd want to. I enjoy figuring things out myself and would either be bogged down having to explain shit or would have someone end up doing the same to me.
File: harpoon-gun.jpg (26KB, 570x327px) Image search:
[Google]
26KB, 570x327px
Is any person smart enough to get a PhD,
assuming they have no mental disorder,
they have enough money to attend university,
they devote sufficient time to studying
and they live in an environment that supports their academic pursuits?
53 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7983587
>Is any person smart enough to do x, given [requirements to do x]?
Yes
>>
>>7983611
I guess my real question is,
Is intellectual achievement merely a function of will? Or are there subtle, imperceptible differences in our mental faculties that would only preclude us from higher education when we reach an indeterminate level?
Take Einstein or Feynman. They obviously were from well-off families that wanted them to go to university, themselves did not exhibit mental disability, and studied furiously and continuously. Are the towering achievements of Einstein, Feynman or Newton the result of mere willpower? Is there some genetically determined knot of neurons somewhere in their brains that produces stunning mathematical insight? Are they merely the result of a lifetime of fortuitous circumstances?
What's the nature of intellectual achievement?
>>
>>7983630
Sub 150 brainlet detected.
File: 0503_horz_wolfram_R.jpg (13KB, 203x250px) Image search:
[Google]
13KB, 203x250px
Please post some exact solutions for "well-known" constants.
Here, "well-known" includes AT LEAST 10 constants beyond e and pi. Have some rationality in what you'd consider a "well-known" constant.
Does this "cleo" character have a tendency to share surprising solutions for various constants? Is the "cleo" character an application of the "Wolfram Alpha"?
38 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Mole
Planck Length
Planck Mass
Plank Constant
Boltzmann Constant
Ideal gas r values
C (speed of em in vacuum)
>>
>>7981468
And where are the solutions for the mentioned costants?
>>
>>7981453
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_(electromagnetism)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%E2%80%93Mascheroni_constant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_of_2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_unit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_constant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant
Monty Hall Problem:
How in God's name does switching doors I'improve your chances?
There are three doors. You pick one. One door is eliminated. Leaving two. 50/50 chance. Monty Hall is bullshit.
118 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
There's already a probability for retards thread
>>
>>7980857
You're a retard if you believe that Monty Hall trash. The chance is obviously 50/50 still, and switching doors makes no difference.
>>
>>7980864
>I can't understand it and it's not intuitive so it's wrong WAAAAAAH
Just go in the other thread, it's explained there
File: 1457243482286.jpg (118KB, 846x756px) Image search:
[Google]
118KB, 846x756px
>make universe absolutely immense
>99,9% is dead rocks or literallly nothing
>max speed is so slow you basically can't go anywhere
>procedurally generated shit all over the place, quality over quantity
BRAVO GOD
66 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>make universe absolutely immense
immensity is relative
>max speed is so slow you basically can't go anywhere
WHAT IS A WARP DRIVE
>99,9% is dead rocks or literallly nothing
what are quantum fluctuations of the vaccuum
>procedurally generated shit all over the place, quality over quantity
what
>>
>>7980798
If that was the only problem...
>>
> /sci/ - Fedoras and Intellectualism
File: nj7597-139a-i1.jpg (40KB, 300x365px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 300x365px
>http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj7597-139a
So, nobody needs skepticism nor objectivity? Wow, what a nice science we have there. Looks like people in science are more afraid of made-up research than they are concerned about real thinking.
29 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7985939
Surveys aren't science.
>>
>94% of the scientists surveyed felt that scientific virtues can be learned.
>>7985952
Are you on of those who still need to learn?
>>
>>7985939
Fedoras and neck-beards play no role in science.
File: violence-unhappy-bizarre-woman-hipster-self-murder-noose-rope-sad-female-dirty-face-holding-35208815.jpg (84KB, 957x1300px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 957x1300px
Why do suicide rates increase dramatically as a society becomes more successful and prosperous?
People living for generations in disease and squalor with no hope for improvement just carry on indefinitely, yet the wealthiest and most educated people in the world kill themselves constantly. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
37 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
The rich are more likely to committ suicide than the poor
>>
>>7984657
Success allows people to face the inherent meaninglessness of life, if youre distracted by the struggle to survive you dont have time to think about it
>>
>>7984657
Because the hard sciences are way further ahead than the social sciences.
Anonymous
Study confirms 'Alpha fucks, Beta bucks' 2016-04-06 23:43:55 Post No.7984182
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Study confirms 'Alpha fucks, Beta bucks' 2016-04-06 23:43:55 Post No.7984182
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Varg-Vikernes-Gun.jpg (108KB, 620x992px) Image search:
[Google]
108KB, 620x992px
Study confirms 'Alpha fucks, Beta bucks'
Anonymous
2016-04-06 23:43:55
Post No. 7984182
[Report]
[View this topic]
>Pair-bonded women who were near ovulation reported greater extra-pair flirtation and greater mate guarding by their primary partner. As predicted, however, these effects were exhibited primarily by women who perceived their partners to be low on hypothesized good genes indicators (low in sexual attractiveness relative to investment attractiveness).
>These findings demonstrate ovulationcontingent shifts in desires and behaviors that are sensitive to varying fitness payoffs, and they provide support for the good genes hypothesis of human female extra-pair mating.
tl;dr, when women in relationships with beta males ovulate, they find their beta partners less attractive and notice and seek attention from alpha males more, and then go back to wanting attention from their beta partners when they are no longer horny.
Also, beta males in relationships are more jealous and guarding of their female partner in the ovulation phase, whereas alpha males report less jealous feelings in their female partners.
http://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/08/02/haselton-gangestad/
29 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7984182
hi gamma
>>
>>7984182
>tl;dr, when women in relationships with beta males ovulate, they find their beta partners less attractive and notice and seek attention from alpha males more
> greater extra-pair flirtation and greater mate guarding by their primary partner
> by their primary partner
>women
>reported
>greater
>by their partner
Work on reading comprehension
>>
>>7984192
The women flirted outside of the relationship more and the men guarded them more so this wouldn't happen.
File: 1457917273192.jpg (122KB, 1278x1181px) Image search:
[Google]
122KB, 1278x1181px
What advantages do elite universities have over regular ones?
67 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>7982828
The jews earn more if you pay more for an "elite" one. Other than that its 90% branding and 10% actual better profs.
t. Ivy league graduate
>>
>>7982828
their students come here to brag because that is the only thing keeping them from killing themselves
>>
You can literally buy your grades