Is the universe participatory, or objective?
Do the laws depend on the observer, or are they rather objective qualities?
define observer
>>8230548
Good one. Define "observer" in a 4chan thread. Haven't entire books been written on determining what constitutes an oberserver, especially in quantum mechanics?
>>8229899
I would argue objective, in that there is existence and a set of laws and conditions that govern it outside our perceptions.
An example would be hallucinogens: Substances that alter our perception of reality and stimulate/inhibit our senses. If I took a hit of Salvia around a group of sober people and saw humpty dumpty appear out of nowhere and the colors get all weird colors for five mons there would be two different subjective interpretations of an objective reality between the individual and the group.
If probability is objective, what is its nature? What kind of thing does P denote? Is it sensible to be realists regarding probability?
>>8229890
Probability is not objective. Probability is shit.
I've thought of a better model for probability in where if something has a bigger chance of happening, it will always happen.
For example, for any coin in existence if you flip it, it will always fall in the same face because all coins have a deformity that will make it have a 50.000000000001% of being heads or tails instead of the other possibility.
This world would be objectively better for us mathematicians. However, other things like dice rolls would get realy fucked up.
You throw a dice and want it to fall in either 3,4,5 or 6. Because it has a higher chance to fall on these numbers that on the other possibility (1 or 2) it will always fall in 3, 4, 5 or 6.
But you can also frame this probability the other way around. Your chances of getting 1,2,3 or 4 instead of 5 or 6 are very high so it will always happen.
So in configuration will dice land? Always on 3 because in this objective probability universe 3 is the only number that can satisfy both realities.
Also if you frame your probability in terms of getting a 1,2 or 3 instead of a 4, 5 or 6 then that is 50/50 so the probability function will collapse to the systems previously defined and the dice will still roll a 3 every single time.
Basically, this universe is gay as fuck.
>>8229904
>this universe is gay as fuck.
I mean the universe we currently live in is shit. The universe I am describing is simply just better.
>>8229904
>I've thought of a better model for probability
This should be entertaining.
In order for aliens to visit, they would have to perfect faster than light travel, or wormhole travel. When they arrived, they would find a laughably primitive human race in comparison to them. They would watch us the way we watch a chimpanzee use a stick to get termites from a mound. We have absolutely nothing to offer them, nothing we can teach them. Why would they bother?
We would bother for the sake of colonisation, and later for mineral extraction. It would likely be the same story for them.
If they had travel capabilities beyond what we can imagine, then they might survey star systems on a very small scale, almost as if going on a hike.
>>8229865
I would hope they would be intergalactic anthropologists, just coming by to observe us from orbit. Not the kind that want our natural resources.
>>8229875
Why not choose a planet without living species? We already depleted some parts of our planet. Sort of intergalactic ecosystem law. and we know that there are millions of Earth like planets so they could choose something different.
Who took this picture?
>who
you mean what
the photographer
God
Why are the true distances between objects in space not commonly taught? I mean just look at this image... People seem to think that the moon sits right next to earth like it does in most images, when in reality it is actually very far away.
Take a look at this: http://joshworth.com/dev/pixelspace/pixelspace_solarsystem.html
(press the little C icon in the bottom right to travel at the speed of light)
>>8229756
It is commonly taught.
In grade school
Glad /x/ could help
>>8229762
It isn't though, not more than "children did you know it's 384400 km to the moon 8^D". It has to be visualized
>>8229770
>It has to be visualized
It is.
Your pic isn't the only image in textbooks. Your image is only to show relative size of the planets
>see pic of relative distance
Little children everywhere stand in classrooms, playgrounds, gymnasiums, and football pitches and mark off the relative distances.
That your local school district didn't push this understanding isn't indicative of all school districts.
As always, /x/ is happy to help
From a mathematical standpoint, how do I improve my chess skills?
>>8229669
Practice more.
https://stockfishchess.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry%E2%80%93Howard_correspondence
>>8229669
What i did was played thousands of hours of online chess on the hardest AI
Hello /Sci/, quick question.
Is Chemsitry a subject that somebody can learn to a high level from home with the use of textbooks + the internet?
Why do you want to learn it?
>>8229596
I want to make LSD.
>>8229600
You won't get the lab experience you need. You'll find that you're quickly over your head. LSD production isn't the meth walk-in-the-park.
I tried asking this question on /his/ but I don't know what I was thinking.
It seems kind of weird that someone who's half-black half-white will look closer to black than white, yet there are billions of people with lighter skin tones out there. If lighter skin is 'recessive', how did it end up so prevalent in the first place? I read that it has something to do with sun absorption and that people with darker skin obviously fair better in sunnier areas closer to the equator. But that doesn't really explain how there was any evolutionary pressure to favor lighter skin over darker skin in less-sunny areas. It's not like modern day dark skinned people have a hard time at all adjusting to less-sunny northern regions.
>>8229543
>why is lighter skin favored in less sunny areas
vitamin d
http://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-Melanin.aspx
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanosome
The evolutionary pressure for skin tone is more likely dependent on sexual selection and population dynamics.
>>8229556
Is the positive evolutionary selection for lighter skin because of vitamin D production really that extreme that darker skinned people would be out-bred? I mean if you look at darker skinned people in the north in the modern day, they have no problem with getting vitamin D. At least not to the point that it would affect their population growth if they weren't careful about getting the necessary amount through modern day supplements.
If there was a giant hollow solid sphere made of a massive dense material and I was to live in the center of it, I wouldn't be pulled in to any particular surface due to the gravitational force from all degrees canceling each other out, but because there is a massive amount of gravity I'm being exposed to, I'd experience time much less slower and I were to watch earth from a distance, everything would look like it's played in fastforward.
Any holes in this theory ?
>>8229513
Yep, if you don't feel any gravitational forces (i.e. the gravity is cancelled out because you're at the centre of a sphere) you won't have any time dilation effects either because there's no gravitational acceleration affecting you. Only in the presence of gravitational forces does time dilation come into play, and since the force acting on you would be zero you won't experience any dilation.
just make sure you don't move and offset your c of g
You don't even have to be at the center, the gravity is zero anywhere inside the shell. Well-known theorem, applies to general relativity (relativistic gravity) too.
Only problem I can think of is the shell collapsing on you.
I know this is a long shot, but is anyone here a highschool math teacher?
I just transferred over from a community college to a nearby University's math program. Everyone within the program is telling me that I should try to take as many comp sci classes as possible (maybe even get a minor, or a double major in comp sci) because if I don't like teaching there's not much I can do with just a bachelor's in math.
I think I'll like teaching math. I always enjoyed tutoring people, and I think I do a pretty good job at explaining things to classmates when they come to me for help. If anyone here is a math teacher for a US high school, can you give me a bit of insight into what the job will actually be like on a day-to-day basis? Do you grow tired of it? Is the classroom management awful? How do you like teaching highschool kids in comparison to other grade levels?
>>8229466
I'm not a teacher but I've heard horror stories about how it isn't what people expect.
>The school and board of education give you your curriculum and you are given only a small amount of flexibility with regards to how you can teach.
>Everyone hates you because the curriculum is ass, this includes but is not limited to students, parents, and teachers.
>The general public thinks you're just a parasite living off their taxes and would like nothing more than to have your wages cut to the absolute minimum.
>Other teachers are retards and if you do manage to make teacher friends and gain any sort of political power then the administration will move you all around because they don't like that.
>In some places, most notably redneckistan (Texas), shit conditions have led to teacher shortages which have been getting filled by dumb and desperate people who simultaneously take teaching courses during night school.
Teaching might sound like a noble way to give back to society and you might think that you can actually help fix a broken math education system but unless you're at a prestigious private school or a post secondary then it's a shit job where everyone hates you.
>>8229466
>>8229488
Hey, OP here. Here's another interesting tidbit on my exposure to teaching. My mom was a third grade teacher who quit because of overbearing shit from the administration. I don't know to what extent all of this goes, but from here it sounds like the principal was this new guy who was there to, in a way, trim fat. He would go find the oldest, most well paid teachers and 'observe' their classroom incessantly. According to my mom, she had one of the most consistent high scores in testing, and she complained about it often. There's a chance she may be exaggerating, but I had her for a teacher and her class was the easiest shit ever when she was teaching me. There were like 5 senior teachers who were all making like 90K, my mom included. He would sit in their classrooms and 'observe' and take notes of their teaching. Within like 4 years 3 of the senior teachers retired early, taking pretty nice retirements (again, my mom included). It is quite weird, but I don't know if this behavior extends to the system at large, or if that was just a shit situation.
I substituted for a 10th grade high school geometry class last year for 2 months. It was very difficult because you have to teach on a schedule, you are burdened with keeping grades up, not the parents or students, or else its review after review after review. Kids dont pay attention and dont take it seriously.
Basically, i was a babysitter that had to get kids to pass the FCAT or the school makes your life worse. The pay is shit too, but i was just a sub.
Im 18 years old third worlder and im gonna study these math chapters in the 2016-2017 school years . Is the average 1st worlder ahead of me in maths or am i gonna be fine because im interested in studying in the us or canada
>>8229393
>differential equations at 18
You're fine, buddy.
>>8229393
I can't tell, It's written in French. I don't know if it's elementary algebra or other advanced algebra from highschool. Are you in Highschool/secondary school?
Try writing in detail what you're studying and at what level. You should really improve your English as well.
>>8229401
Yeah im at high school , terminal year . And in my shithole we study 13 years in school not 12 like most countries .
Retard here.
So Neptune is a ice giant, correct?
Mainly filled with water ammonia methane and so on.
I guess that mean it's not a water world, right?
For example, If I were to go down to the surface(assuming there is a surface) I would not splash down in alien waters, I would instead keep descending into clouds of methane and ice, right?
Also, it's gravity is 1.14 times that of earth. Does that mean it's one hundred and somewhat percent more than earth's, or is it just a fraction above earth's grav?
>>8229389
The atmosphere gets denser and denser until it is a liquid under intense pressure.
>>8229389
>it's gravity is 1.14 times that of earth. Does that mean it's one hundred and somewhat percent more than earth's, or is it just a fraction above earth's grav?
It means on the 'surface' you would weigh 114 pounds if you weighed 100 pounds on Earth. The gravity is less than you might think Neptune's size would generate because you are that much further from Neptune's center of mass on its 'surface'.
>>8229453
>It means on the 'surface' you would weigh 114 pounds if you weighed 100 pounds on Earth.
i wonder what the long term effects would be on a human.
Its known that eyes start to change in zero gravity for example.
And not the good kind of change.
How should I study math? I'm looking to start from scratch.
>>8229347
Start with proving P=NP
that should do it
Khan academy, easy shit.
>>8229347
A lot of this threads lately. Read the wiki. If you've read then someone needs to rewrite it.
>every action has an equal opposite reaction
>punch an object with 30 N of force
>there's 30 N of force in the punch's direction
>there's 30 N of force in the opposite direction to the punch
Energy doesn't disappear when applied in opposite directions so where the hell does the energy from for the "reacting" 30 N come from? Where is conservation of energy when you need it?
>>8229282
You didn't blow anything apart. You just don't understand it.
>>8229282
>where the hell does the energy from for the "reacting" 30 N come from
from the potential energy of the object you just punched
>>8229282
There was no energy in the first place
Maths describes the universe. Math is extremely deterministic. Therefore the universe is extremely deterministic.
Probabilities is math too
Math describes the universe well only in the parts where it's deterministic.
>>8229228
Of course it is, the universe is a simulation,