Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1518. page

File: giphy.gif (639KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 500x281px

>>8222407
He tells me it tests if R-squared is statistically significant from 0. Is this true?
>>8222418
Sure

>>8222460
LEWD

>>8222407
>>8222418
>>8222425
>>8222446
>>8222460
>>8222462
What do any of these posts have to do with science, degenerate weeaboos?

Just take your pedophile cartoons back to >>>/a/, retarded pedophiles. You're not welcomed here.

>>8222315
>>>/biz/

>>8222315
I can recommend not letting a dictator tank your economy down the shitter.

>>8222315
>I'm student-economist from Russia

I am a student-mathematician.

The reason Russia lags behind is because of their communist shit. Your system sucks. Do you people even vote?

No, I think that's more societal influence that makes them think their life sucks.

>>8222304
Well in my case at least it's a self fulfilling profesy. I feel like shit so Indont go anywhere so I just sit around all day and feel like shit.

One word: Multifactorial.

Mathematical proofs are always correct by definition.
the real world, however, is not continuous and so it has limitations.

>>8222254
What are you even asking?

>>8222288
why is this paradox not rejected as stupid and not - creative

Sample size = 2?

>>8222208

Yes, sorry.

What I'm asking is:

If a study with a sample size of 2 has a positive result and the population the sample is drawn from is 7 billion, is there anyway to calculate the probability of the positive result being insignificant?

Or calculate how likely/unlikely it is to be accurate?

The engine had an anomaly shut down in flight, and the rocket fell into the sea. The rocket is actually relatively intact, so they're working on recovery.

>>8222191
>Copenhagen suborbitals
>suborbital
>sub
>orbital
>as in not reaching orbit

>>8221985
We're already immortal. The ego is the only thing that isn't.

>>8221985
Why make a copy when you could slowly replace your brain with cybernetics until there's no organic brain left? You know, the Brain of Theseus and all that?

Using that logic

When I go to sleep, and then wake up, am I not technically a clone?

What is quantum language?

File: barrage.jpg (39KB, 626x622px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 626x622px

>>8221926

>>8221926

Because we don't fully understand how it works.

>>8221827

by not being a jealous faggot

>>8221827
Here is a scientific paper that will satisfy your profound needs.
http://scigen.csail.mit.edu/scicache/73/scimakelatex.7291.none.html

Bump i'm really interested too

>>8221768
>The most adequate studying methods to study math and anything.
Stop making these stupid threads, get off 4chins, and just do it.

>>8221768
There's no miracle cure for being retarded.

File: oh boy.png (9KB, 195x259px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 195x259px

>>8221816

Lol what. Are you saying we shouldn't
use the scientific method to find the best ways for humans to study different subjects?

If you want to throw away your social life for studies, it's okay, but there are people who get better results than you + have a social life,
because we want to find better solutions.

That is not stupid. Stupidity is to study tired e.g.

>>8221683
since you're from /b/, i guess you found it under your foreskin

since you're from /b/ I guess it's a piece of hardened semen from your collection

>>8221688
>>8221727
I can see you had those jokes loaded and ready to fire, but no i am not "from" /b/ i am just asking asshat.

>>8221564
>I have too many stamps to collect
>how can people collect so many? they're so smart

>biologists

but will they take the bait?

File: 38651193.jpg (193KB, 970x1454px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 970x1454px

>>8221577
Enjoy staring at a computer screen and kissing your bosses' ass while I'm saving lives kiddo

>>8221562
Partially. Physics is also an experimental science. And every 'axiom' has to be empirically verified.

>>8221562
In physics you try to reverse engineer a set of axioms that describe the real world (with limited success).

In math you start with sets of axioms and work out what sorts of things they describe.

>>8221562
Mathematics is immune to misinterpretation, and it is the language of the universe which is why it is used in physics.

I've smoked a fair bit of weed in my day but no matter how much good shit you smoke it doesn't compare to real psychedelics.

"greening out" is just where you get sick, or you can even pass out. once when I smoked a bunch while on a few adderall I had excessive ear ringing, everything went brown (blurry, darkened vision) and I couldn't think at all, went away after a few minutes.

all in all I'm convinced cannabis in excess is bad for your heart, teeth, gums, vitamins/nutrients and cognitive ability.

>>8221568
Trust me when you have zero tolerance after months without and take a large, large dose of oil, it's psychedelic and psychedelic like for sure, there is no doubt, literally I'm having open eye visuals right now

You can trip pretty hard on cannabis. This is coming from somebody who's done DMT, taken a legendary amount of shrooms in his lifetime, and generally tripped the fuck out a lot on a lot of things.

If your tolerance is low enough and the weed is strong enough, you can have full-on hallucinations with your eyes closed. This is true whether you're fried already or not. Once you've been far out enough on psychedelics, or if you've done them recently, weed can call forth some of that psych's effects. If you're permanently fried enough, tripping a little can just become part of smoking weed.

Personally, one of the strongest and strangest trips I've ever had was entirely cannabis-induced, and it took place before I had ever done normal psychedelics. Anybody who says you can't trip on weed hasn't tried hard enough.

Somebody studies philosophy.

The reason I do science and Engineering is because I personally find it fun and interesting. Plenty of people talk about how science is for the "advancement of humanity" but me and my colleagues agree that the only reason we have the careers that we do is because it's just something that we find interesting. Humans are hard wired to like finding out new things.

>>8221454
This is what Descartes was trying to establish when he said "I think there for I am." The only thing we can be certain of is that we exist, everything else is mere speculation. With that being said, I think Descartes was trying to weed-out all the bullshit, and establish a line of reasoning behind philosophy and mathematics, establish the basis of our knowledge, which we then built on

>>8221529
Then Nietzsche came and Descartes reasoning was completely BTFO with epistemological refute.