So /pol/ and /x/ have been sperging about pic related for a few months now. Now considering both boards are batshit crasy, I figured, I'd ask here about what this is and whether it poses any threat to Earth. It appears to be moving towards Virgo if that helps at all
I'll post more of what gets posted in the threads about it on /x/
it's a weather balloon
Another screenshot from the threads, for whatever reason it's censored on Google Sky
How do I solve this by hand?
>>9126673
I know this is the answer but my substitution is not working
>>9126676
you solve it using the residue theorem
>>9126682
Haven't lean't that in my course yet, any other ways?
How do I win the lottery /sci/?
>>9126637
>How do I win the lottery /sci/?
Track down the "honey" that just won and marry her.
>>9126637
Option 1: Buy a ticket and wait.
Option 2 (conspiracy): Be a relative of one of the jews that owns lottos so that they pick you to be the winner. Then go collect your prize. Don't forget that your pay is only 10% of the actual prize money, the rest you need to give back to your jewish relative.
Option 3: Be a born jewish. Get the trillions of dollars in your bank account and then make your own lotto. Set up the prize so that for every dollar the winner gets, you earn 2 dollars from tickets.
Option 4 (conspiracy): Be born jewish. Tell your dad who owns the federal reserve to print you 800 million dollars. Start a lotto and get the profits off ticket sales.
>>9126644
This.
Hold your nose and think of England.
Why do people pretend they're so hyped for eclipses?
That shit's pretty fucking boring.
>>9126596
it's one of those things that is exponentially more fascinating in person than when seen in a video or picture
>>9126602
Not really.
animal spirits
mob mentality
cryptomysticism
rampant brainletism
Hello, /sci/.
Due to racist faggots on /b/, /pol/ and other boards always shitting on my group of people and impersonating them in slide threads/troll threads, I have a set of questions for you.
Can a totalitarian/autocratic nihilist society without religion and "ethics" in the way utilize unmoderrated science experiments to create things like clones with superhuman traits, mutants, or cyborgs?
Can a eugenics program make a group more logistic and smarter? (Extermination of those who follow cultures that damage the collective image of the group, selective breeding, and genetic modding/editing, forced to live a certain way by their society)
In a society which a woman must have a pregnancy license in order to have a child without the child being terminated and must score well on an IQ test to receive the license, will future generations be smarter?
If teen pregnancy numbers reduced to zero over time and toxic cultures were obliterated, would kids stop getting dumber as each generation comes into existence?
Is it possible to make smarter people, wipe out a landmass of dumb people, have those remaining survivors' genes bred out of them, and effectively have the progeny and engineered people replace the original inhabitants on that landmass?
Is it possible to make industrial/military technological advances in a totalitarian society without ethical religious oversight? (Advanced gauss/coil technology, small plasma reactors, clone armies with bionic enhanced bodies, robotic limbs with integral tools, genetically modified animals, cyborg animals, bioweapons that re-write genetic code, viruses that make people live longer, etc.)
>>9126554
Literally none of these questions are science related.
At best you'll get answers based on conjectures at worst you'll get some 16 year old brainlet soapboxing his stupid, r/4chan edgy, uninformed opinion.
>>9126559
Are you serious?
I literally asked about eugenics and gene editing. That is science.
>>9126554
>If teen pregnancy numbers reduced to zero over time and toxic cultures were obliterated, would kids stop getting dumber as each generation comes into existence?
but older women are the ones with higher rates of down syndromes, eggs are best in teenage females
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo3oGXBXglE
>some scholar decides to search for evidence in scientific literature about discoveries of ancient humans
>he found dozens of discoveries made by archeologist and published in fucking peer reviewed journals but that contradicts the textbooks acepted officially by academia
>he publish a book
>scientists get butthurt
>they claim is pseudoscience but they can't do that because is based on real research published on peer reviewed world class journals
>scientists get butthurt (literally epic butthurt)
>he still gets invited to talk to the royal academy of science and other institutes
>scientists still claim is pseudoscience (even while his research is based on peer reviewed studies of the most serious journals)
>scientists can only say: oh, but this is a problem with real science, since, you know... uh, sometimes... real evidence gets discarded when it conflicts with the accepted theories, that's how science works
>they are eternally butthurt because his book proves evolution is wrong
>tfw scientists still defend their religion (evolution) and choose to ignore evidence in favour of scientific dogma
>sci will say is pseudoscience even while his research is based on peer reviewed literature
;)
when you were when science got proven is a religion and evolution got proven wrong.
>but is pseudoscience, the evidence are hoax
>REEEEEEEEE
seriously, if you care about intelectual honesty, you can't dismiss his evidence.
try to throw away evolution, boys.
>>9126501
damn dude can you at least give a tl;dr?
>>9126501
______________ TROLL LINE ESTABLISHED __________________
>>9126505
>spherical concretion discs found in the ground
>quacks claim they are manmade
>geologists prove them wrong
>quacks ignore it because muh religion
I had an exam today about discrete fourier transforms and stuff but I didn't understand a question
I've been asked to give a function x[n] that is imaginary and odd and draw a graph of it
Would x[n] = i*sin(nT) be a correct answer?
And then simply draw a sine function like I would have if it was simply x[n] = sin(nT) ?
It can't be that simple can it?
>>9126463
x[n]=x[n]
You can express your gratitude here: 1DnAHwz6MsYT7ux4iRyQud21XnMJb5bRpP
>>9126463
>I had an exam today about discrete fourier transforms
OP tell me what is the inverse Fourier transform of the constant function [math]\mathbf{1}[/math] on the frequency domain [math]\{0,1,2, \dots, N\}[/math]?
>>9126472
delta[n]
Is it possible, to create a biological/chemical weapon which only targets women ? How would one go about it ? Should the person in question focus on estrogen levels in homo sapiens to specifically target females ? Also, wouldn't that also target females of other species ?
>>9126453
"Shoe sale 80% off" sign above a trap door that leads to their death.
>>9126453 none that would spread efficiently.
Also if it was a bio weapon, cross species death would likely be minimal.
>>9126453
Chemicals in Water Supply are turning the 4 Chan Pepe Frogs G A Y !!!
Source: Alex Jones.
is reality real?
>>9126439
Reality is subjective and a conscious observer is required to collapse the wavefunction
>>9126439
Welcome to glorious VR waifu age
>>9126451
this is the future
How do hurricanes work?
>>9126432
How do magnets work?
>>9126432
hurricanes are the spirits of the angry africans whose children were sold into slavery. During hurricane katrina some people prayed to let them know that we are free and they can stop now.
>>9126432
1: Sun heats ocean.
2: Warm ocean heats air above it, while adding water vapor.
3: Warm moist air rises.
4: Warm moist air reaches as high as it can then flows to the side as more warm air rises beneath it.
5: Warm moist air at altitude expands, as pressure is less up there, and as a consequence it cools down.
4: Cooler air hods less water vapor, clouds form.
5: Rain happens.
6: Because Earth is spinning, Coriolis Effect makes the air spreading out (see 4:) spin in a huge vortex.
7: ?????
8: HURRICANE!
Are most of the biggest theories all incorrect? They just satisfy our seeking mind, how the heck can a 120-200 IQ human being with a "degree" in certain fields understand things beyond human comprehension?
>>9126423
The notion that all of nature is just so incomprehensible to humans is the biggest fucking meme. We can understand some things ffs
>>9126436
You're likely wrong judging by the temper
Your entire post is a joke, calling something a meme is more "frustrated mans philosophy", proving my point.
>>9126436
>>9126447
You not talking without bias is what bothers me. Most people can't, even when they do they still get it wrong.
Let me explain why you're proving my point... It just makes me lose interest in you but I do want answers, even if none show up.
Start by explaining your initial hostility to my Op. Like did I oppose one of your dogmas? So you felt like "killing" me for it? That's a typical primitive reaction to "different" opinions.
Or if you don't answer those questions, give me some notion/philosophy of yours to argue my notions, idk, anything you feel certain of. Even if you're sure of it, even if your mind is very analytical and "tight"-thinking, it's all facile and likely wrong.
My argument is "I don't know" and I'm very, very analytical.
WE KNOW
>>9126427
ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUST ELON MUSK
>>9126372
I don't care so much about the fact it's Elon Musk, but I do hope his efforts invigorate public interest in space again
What did/sci think would happen If, enriched liquid uranium was rapidly exposed to great magnetic pressure like 8 times our atmosphere mainly the LHC that magneticly confines small partials
In a spherical way wouldn't it be akin to explosive implosion.
>pic related
>>9126312
Has anyone ever been so far as to...?
>>9126321
Maybe the u.s? Sounds like super waifu nuke to me.
>>9126312
I'm unsure of how much pressure it takes to trigger a nuclear explosion but 8 atm's is probably not enough.
Instructions okay:
1. Find a simple coincidence in the physical space
2. In your head, empty the memories out of the picture so your left with the essence of the coincidence, and the essence of what it is coincidence with (so both parts) and keep it together
3. put the first part of the shape or whatever (should consist of the two parts) on the word know, and the other part will find
4. it may be instant, it may happen in a few hours to a few days
>>9126069
So crazy it might just work.
>>9126069
>>9126069
>empty the memories
That's not how memory works
What is the science behind this?
>>9126039
>science behind this
Aeronautics
Pretty simple really
tl;dr
it pushes air down to stay up, but once the air has been propelled down it is more difficult to push down, hence why it keeps moving forward to get to "still air" to push down
>>9126039
it's called the acme effect, discovered by walt disney.