Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1154. page

File: 1476504035944.png (147KB, 457x457px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 457x457px

>>8507592
>multiplicative identity
>1

>>8507617
>what is the symmetric group

File: castro.jpg (344KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 2000x1333px

>>8507592
>definite integral
>area under a curve

Do all the proofs to every single notion you cover in class and you'll end up competent in math's methods. You can read whatever you care about the most on the side

Sounds a bit too much, or am I missing somehting? anyways, this semester Im going to finish all the maths unless i'll take more, but I think I can progress faster myself...

>>8507567
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Mathematics

>>8507450
Same thing that happens to all TV programmes:
>Got repetitive
>Started running out of ideas
>Got old
>Leading to declining viewer base
>Leading to getting it's funding cut
>Leading to it having to scale back
>Causing it's viewer base to shrink even more....

>>8507450
I think Mythbusters had a good run. It got kind of stupid near the very end but there's nothing wrong with popsci in and of itself.

>>8507450

>two jews that hate each other: the show

>now with a side of tits and a weird asian guy and that other one

>>8507431
>Engineering on top

lmao please be joking about this. Even fucking comp sci is higher than eng fags

>>8507431
>Ranking majors
Signs of crippling inferiority complex

>>8507431

I just want to say that anyone who makes these charts or puts ANY credence on them is a fucking moron and is a net drain on human society.

peace.

Devide numerator and denominator by n

>>8507285
I don't know if this is what you are looking for but think about it logically

as N approaches infinity, 3n^2 becomes fuck huge and n is far smaller. Thus it will become a smaller and smaller fraction and approach 0

>>8507285
[eqn]\frac{n}{3n^2+2} = \frac{1}{3n+\frac{2}{n}}[/eqn]

You know have to prove that [math]3n+\frac{2}{n}[/math] is infinite.

It's easy.

File: 1b0.jpg (56KB, 499x485px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 499x485px

>>8507009
>Are women able to prevent a pregnancy after being raped in the state of nature (wilderness)?
Get outta here Todd Akin

How effective would pouring water down the vagina be, and how long until it is of no use?
Would be as useful as teaching a bunch of inner city nigger gang bangers the basics of Shakespeare.

>>8507009
I think the male mate would just beat her until the pregnacy was terminated

There are herbs that can be taken before or after sex to prevent pregnancy.
Silphium (now extinct,) willow, date palm, pomegranate, pennyroyal, artemisia, myrrh, rue, or daucus carota are a few.

I think you can answer this yourself.

Self-esteem and social skills are very rarely genetic (unless you have an actual symptom).

File: 1480293856751.jpg (6KB, 487x423px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 487x423px

>>8506916
>stereotypical alpha male in total exclusion and let him live on his own until 18
he would be insane, is this bait?

File: prince.jpg (74KB, 760x507px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 760x507px

>>8506922

can you back those claims?

>>8506830
I'm pretty sure it would need a fuckton less mass in order to have 0 g at the equator, so no solution

>>8506830
Probably somewhere between an hour and an hour and a half.
Do the math yourself.

>>8506830
>How long would an Earth's day have to be if we wanted to have a Zero-G state (weightlessness) on the equator?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centripetal_force

Force = (Mass*(Speed^2))/Radius

Mass = 100kg (testing)
Radius = 6,371,000 meters

To reach 980 newtons of force (the amount nessecary for 9.8m/s accel on a 100kg body), a speed of 7,940 meters per second is required, or:

17,761 miles per hour

Earths current rotational speed is approx 1,000 miles per hour.

Currently, You weigh about 1/100th less on the equator than you do at the poles due to centrifugal force.

At a angular speed of 17,761 miles per hour, one complete revolution would take approx 1.4 hours (84 minutes.)

>>8506557
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=c4+gene+chromosome+6&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C6&as_sdtp=

You're welcome.

One word

LSD

>>8506557
>Not knowing basic nomenclature
>Asking /sci/ for something you could fucking Google
Troll detected

>>8506482
No evidence or reason to think GMOs are harmful.

>>8506520
No evidence or reason to think GMOs are safe.

>>8506544
Except for every single scientific study finding they are safe and you nutjobs failing to come up with a single coherent hypothesis for how they could cause harm.

>>8506425
I usually stay in bed with my ipad while proving theorems and stuff, really comfy

>>8506425
u overestimate the human mind which can only think one thing at a time. it does poorly with complex things like equations. for instance, divide 282 by 13 and answer both quotient and remainder, a fairly easy thing to do with maths on paper. youll see my point. we re weak..thats why we use language so much because how incredibly stupid we are. infact so stupid most of us dont even realize our stupidity. thank god for computers.

>>8506586
>u overestimate the human [...]
282/13 is fairly easy.
28/13=2R[2]
[2]2/13=1R9.
21R9 is the answer.
What If I develop a mental blackboard?
Source: The mind's eye. Sacks.

>>8506199
Bump

perception itself, t b h

memes

File: CyYjCLKW8AEIHYh.jpg (36KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1200x675px

>>8505709

>>8505709
I dont understand.

Youre asking why it's better to view something travelling across your field of vision as opposed to having it directly collide with your eyes.

Think about it like this, is it easy to watch the water fall from your shower or a hose when it's spraying your face? Same principal applies.

>>8505709
Light sources are bright.
Its much easier to see the light refracted off of things.
For instance you dont actually see light at an angle, rather fine particles in the air that catch it and outline the light, showing the path it takes.

>Assumes radians

First, tell us why this isn't trivial.

File: output.png (262KB, 1024x2140px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1024x2140px

>>8504834
Please pick out this equation from a list of trig identites.
>it isnt there
New trig identity

>How would you do the calculus at distances below the Planck Length?
Give me one example where you would need to

>>8504165

it's equally valid to argue that you would or you wouldn't need to, but i'm just wondering if it's theoretically possible. been bugging me for a while.

i'm leaning towards yes, it is possible, but i have no evidence.

File: Андре́й Андре́евич Ма́рков.jpg (10KB, 307x400px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 307x400px

>>8504173
>i'm leaning towards yes, it is possible, but i have no evidence.

or anyone, apart from the denizens of this place to discuss it with for that matter