So /lit/ I've been in love for about 2 years and I just can't get her out of my head.
Now I'm a very logical person and seeing love being overused in all forms of art, I wonder is there is a spiritual element on romantic love or is just biological functions.
Is there a book that analyzes those two possibilities?
>>7322906
I have been in love for 4 years
There's some days I don't think about her but mostly everyday I do
>>7322906
Love does not exist--it is the result of chemical processes. However, it is unknown how exactly the chemical processes translate to the feeling of the illusion of love.
How The Mind Works
Particularly the Hotheads chapter and the stuff on rivals, etc.
Realest thing I've never had to fake...
Piece of cake...
You're different from the ones before...
I know you don't believe it's you I've waited for...
Rate the languages you know and provide in what order you learned them. Maybe how good a language seems depends on how many early experiences are tied to it.
For example I read Harry Potter in German first (I was 12), and found it amazing, then in English it seemed robotic and unrelatable.
My favorite languages:
1. Russian
2. German
3. French
4. English
The order I learned them in
1+ 2. Russian/ German
3. French
4. English
Just Portuguese (native) and English. I don't really remember when I "learned" English, I think I was about 11 or 12.
I haven't fully learned a language yet, but I've dabbled in Norwegian/Swedish and some very minor Japanese. I'm currently committing to Russian right now and I have been for a few months. So far Russian is my favorite. Would any of you guys some pretty good resources for learning Russian? All I have is pic related.
>>7322686
>favourites
1.English
2.German
3.French
4.spanish
>Order learnt in
1+2 English + french (Father's french)
3. German
4. spanish (2nd year learning)
Honestly I like english and german the most, english more so as i'm much better at it.
Thoughts? Having been forced to read this I'm really unimpressed. Is everything Wilde wrote this lame?
Just started the book yesterday and honestly cannot say that I am enjoying it so far. Maybe it gets better?
>>7322611
>forced to read
Sorry about that. Maybe come back to it when you're more mature and willing to read it.
>>7322627
Not really. You should probably finish it for, like, cultural reasons because it isn't a hard read at all, but it doesn't get very good.
Has anyone learned another language for the purpose of reading literature in its original language? Did you get any worthwhile insights over the translations? I want to learn German so that I can read all of the great philosophers in their native tongue.
I've been learning German for eight years and spent a couple months in Brandenburg. Still can't touch the philosophers. Can read Hesse without a dictionary and Kafka and Goethe pretty well though.
English translations clear a lot of stuff up for German, since Germans can make infinite sentences packed with relative clauses that make sense but are awful to read. The original is nice because it keeps article gender and of course some words are hard to translate. It's a really directional language so it's fun to start thinking in German terms about movement and space and stuff.
>>7322540
I'm doing this with Arabic.
No, but I am currently studying Ancient Greek so hopefully I will be able to read it soon enough.
Oi /lit/, lets talk some books from the last ten or so years that you think deserve some recognition.
I'm offering up Skippy Dies by Paul Murray. Great book by an Irish author. Some describe it as Hogwarts with drugs and corruption instead of magic. Related characters, very funny, beautiful prose and wide vocabulary. (Can also recommend his other two novels, An Evening Of Long Goodbyes and The Mark and the Void, which came out earlier this year.)
Close runner up would be & Sons by David Gilbert, about a reclusive Salinger-esque author on the verge of being on his death bed, set in Manhattan.
What've youse got?
i thought the luminaries by eleanor catton was pretty damn good.
I've been singing the praises of David Rakoff for years, very funny essayist who died way too soon.
I friggin love Skippy dies. And it's the first time in years I've heard of it.
>buy avant garde novel consisting of 500 blank pages
>read it
>>7322451
Order Phenomenology of Spirit, In Search of Lost Time online at premium prices.
>>7322451
>print out lengthy strings of numbers from a random number generator
>read it
I am reading infinite jest for the 10th time.
I wish I was kidding.
Get on my fucking level plebs
Hey /lit/, I've compiled a bunch of books that increased my understanding of the world and would like to share them with you, and hopefully get some recommendations as well, most are focused around Black radicalism but include anti-colonial/imperialist/oppression and non-racially focused books.
Includes:
>Critical Race Theory - Richard Delgado, Jean Stefancic
>Medical Apartheid - Harriet A. Washington
>The Wretched of the Earth - Frantz Fanon
>Are Prisons Obsolete - Angela Davis
>Assata, An Autobiography - Assata Shakur
>The Philosophies and Opinions of Marcus Garvey
>Racism without Racists - Eduardo Bonilla Silva
>Pedagogy of the Oppressed - Paulo Freire
>How Europe Underdeveloped Africa - Walter Rodney
>Huey P. Newton Reader
>Lies My Teacher Told Me - James W. Loewen
>The Autobiography of Malcolm X - el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz (with assistance of Alex Haley)
>The New Jim Crow - Michelle Alexander
Revolutionary Suicide - Huey P. Newton
>Negroes with Guns - Robert F. Williams
>The Black Radical Tradition - Collection of works from many black radicals.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/oo31iudyahban6t/Good_Shit_Mhm.7z
>>7322361
Nice, thanks for the books.
>>7322361
most of that is old school shit
if you are looking for more anti-colonial lit, some more contemporary authors are spivak, babha, agamben. i left the academy years ago, not sure who is highly cited of the last 20 or so years
>>7322487
No problemo
Just wanted to share
>>7322517
Yeah its definitely old school. I'll check those out for sure, thanks for the tip.
>"the academy"
spooky
How do you guys distinguish good literature from bad literature?
I can read a book, get really into it, like it or hate it, but I am so bad at actually valuing a book on its literary content/value.
I seriously thought Murakami was high lit before I came here and someone explained to me why he is not high lit. I can only recognize this shit when people cut it out for me. I want to be able to judge things myself, not be dependent on other people to see what I don't see.
What shall I do? find an introduction to literary criticism?
>>7322339
>he subscribes to the good/bad dichotomy
>>7322339
read more
1. What does this work of art try to do?
2. Did it do that?
3. Was that worth doing?
If you could make mandatory the reading of 5 philosophy books for everybody which would it be?
Mine:
1
Being and Time
The World as Will and Representation
Being and Nothingness
Cartesian Meditations
Anything by Emil Cioran from his French days
“An Essay on Time” by Norbert Elias
“Being and Time” by Martin Heidegger
“The Technological Society” by Jacques Ellul
“The Concept of Anxiety” by Soren Kierkegaard
“Matter and Memory” by Henri Bergson
The Republic
Critique of Pure Reason
The Science of Logic
Negative Dialectics
Physics
The Republic
Cartesian Meditations
Treatise on Human Nature
Critique of Pure Reason
Philosophical Investigations
So why do some people hate this man and call him the japanese coehlo?
>>7322323
Because he is. D'oh.
i thought it was japanese john green
>>7322323
He likes to meme. Because he is a meme. He writes for "intellectual" yuppies. They can feel smart reading his pseudo literature.
I was wondering if we could possibly have a thread about recommendations for Philosophy.
Personally I have quite some interest in it, but since I didn't go to school for it and never really pursued it at the time, I sometimes feel lost as to which philosophers I should look for, the order and relations they have between each other's way of thinking and, most importantly, which works I should read.
I've been on /lit/ for a while now, use the wiki a whole lot, as well as #bookz, and even though philosophy has always been discussed a lot, but no charts or images for recommendations of works or even some general guide of said works were really made. I might be mistaken, of course, and this exists, so I'd be grateful if someone could post it, should that be the case.
If it really doesn't exist, then could we maybe make it? Maybe something as simple as naming the author, his most noteworthy work or works, keeping in mind how well they can teach someone who is new to all of this, or maybe isn't really bright or intelligent like you guys.
Any quick notes on one author's works being related in any particular way to another author's would be neat, but not necessary.
I chose this image because it's brought me a lot of happiness over the last year or so. It's from the wiki
I guess this is a tough thread to push for, especially since I can't contribute to it myself. Alright, I'll bump it this one time and then let it die, if no one is interested.
I have a chance to see him in a discussion with Yanis Varoufakis.
Should I go? Has anyone here ever gone to see him talk?
I guess technically this thread is allowed here anymore, but /his/ doesn't have the same relation to Zizek as /lit/ does, if it has any. It wouldn't make sense to post it there. Sorry, Hiroyuki, but /his/ was a terrible idea.
>>7322251
Yes, then afterward ask him if he knows he's a meme
>>7322251
Totes m8, it's definitely going to be funny and possibly enlightening.
the whole /his/ is crawling with spooks
>>7322233
/lit/ - literature
>>7322239
kid, you don't want him to make you read the ego and its own so you understand the text at hand and its relevance to literature. after the first goethe quotation the prose goes way down, just don't put yourself through it.
>mfw browsing through /his/
Does /lit/ like writing chinese or chinese literature?
pic related I'm learning the HSK level A 800 pls no bully.
>>7322214
…do you even get what the grid is for?
don't waste your time just do anki and be done with it