So I read the first two chapters of this, up to the point when Hitler decides communism and jews are the root of all evil. However, I still can't understand why does he hate those two things so much.
On communism, he certainly seems concerned for the workers' rights, yet says communists are hideous. Maybe it's because they're not as fanatically nationalistic as he is?
On jews, I really haven't got a clue. He somehow concludes they're behind all the "lies and degeneracy" he can see around himself, but I don't understand how he gets to that conclusion. At least Varg Vikernes makes a point saying they're not really European, but mongrels who pollute his precious race.
Anyone can explain this to me a bit more?
>>7673367
Bump. Perhaps I'll get a better insight in the next few chapters?
He says communists are hideous because he lived among them and saw how a few bourgeois rabble-rousing cocksuckers whipped up these morons with trash pamphlets, while he was putting actual effort into reading and figuring out the ideology. Communist workers were footsoldiers for an evil cause. The people controlling them were the true evil.
The people controlling them, from what he observed, were Jews. Everywhere he looked. He even says he resisted believing his initial findings as long as possible in order to confirm them, but that ultimately he had to admit, Jews were overrepresented in everything that was eating away at the dying heart of his country.
He doesn't just theorize that Judaism is conducive to evil. That's not his interest, at least not at first. The first encounter with Jews is in Vienna, when he observes that, for whatever reason, they're the ones responsible for a lot of evil.
I just found out that the sixth book is due out end of May.
Might be good. Enjoyable, at the very least.
>>7673353
literally who?
Any other good historical fiction?
Graves' other books, especially Count Belisarius
Yourcenar's Memoirs of Hadrian
Gore Vidal's Julian, and Creation
Sienkiewicz's "Seriously, fuck Germans" series
Clavicle's Shogun
Ursula le Guin's Lavinia doesn't really fit the bill but still good
Wolfe's Latro in the Mist
Bengsston (?) The Long Ships
All of the above are generally considered good/~literary~, but Sinkiewicz is old romantic nationalism so YMMV, le Guin is a bit more obscure than the rest
>>7673318
Steven pressfields stuff is good
>other
Lets say you had a small room to build a library/study in. You only have modest budget to fill it but you have the rest of your lifetime to do it. What books and curiosities do you fill it with?
The sections of the bookself are divided as so: (note that if you hate a section you don't have to include it)
Encyclopedia set
Dictionary
Scholarly mathematical or scientific texts and journals
Psychology/Psychiatry
Economics
Nonfiction
-narrative
-memoir
-travel
Fiction
-literary
-comedic
-war/military
-historical
-romance
-new adult
-erotica
-thriller
-mystery
-horror
-sci-fi
-steam/diesel/biopunk
-high fantasy
-low fantasy
-urban fantasy
Religious
-mainstream
-small religions
-extinct religions
-neopagan, heathenry
-occult
There is also a small glass door cabinet built into one of the walls. You can either remove it to make room for more books or you can fill it with curiosities.
>>7673251
it would just be a lot of philosophy, religion (mainly abrahamic but some zoroastrian, hindu, buddhist, and maybe sikh stuff, too), and history. maybe some stuff on economics, politics, and "science." i don't really read a lot of fiction anymore unless it touches heavily on religion or war.
its called my phone which has all of that already
>>7673278
>no fun allowed
/lit/ likes Gene Wolfe, right? I've never read anything by him. Is this a good one to start on?
Book of the New Sun or Fifth Head of Cerberus tend to be the starterpacks
You could i guess, but its very different than what he's usually known for. Still excellent though
>>7673227
It was my first Wolfe and remains one of my favorite books of all time. It's absolutely brilliant, and a real treat if you're interested in Greek history.
Hey /lit/, could you guys give me your opinions on this opening excerpt?
http://www.ew.com/article/2016/02/04/michael-dimartino-rebel-genius
Fucking hell he's actually going through with it. I remember finding out about what Mike and Bryan were going to be up to on /co/.
Anyway, it reads like George R.R. Martin for kids. Mike's prose is boring and workmanlike, which I suppose isn't the worst thing in the world. We get a huge lore-dump right away, which I hate, and for some reason this fantasy setting having a person say 'Yeah, right' is extremely annoying.
It's YA, so it's not for me. But I don't like it, even so.
>>7673250
>Anyway, it reads like George R.R. Martin for kids
Remarkably dead-on
There's something that bugs me about authors using the character's name over and over instead of pronouns.
Can you guys suggest some afro-centric/afro-latino-centric novels?
>>7673204
oscar wao
>>7673205
I'm Dominican, so I respect Diaz as a person for putting us on the literary map. But fr, Drown is his only good book desu.
Are there any novels, poems, or short stories that I should read before reading Andre Breton's Nadja?
>>7673199
Some lighter surrealist works would probably be helpful.
>>7673199
Why would there be dumbass
Found some of my teen poetry, not as shit as I remembered. Teenage poetry you wrote that you're secretly not ashamed of.
A long summer in a short spring
I often feel I store myself in sunlight
Each summer beaming back to it quite as much as it to me.
And in winter I forget my cache as it rests icy, flung to airless seas
Autumn is to trundle through with footstep barley bold to break the leaves.
But in spring myself returns to me, each ray an older homesick summer.
On years leave until with bright finger tips it lays a hand on me.
And with my weight as anchor pulls back summer through the trees.
Noise bombs throw down newspaper stands
The mayor he throws up gets it on his hands
Infants run screaming down train station hallways
We'll never get home cause we can't work the subways
What's in my water and why can't I taste it
What's stuck in my throat that won't let me say this
Piss drenched sneakers and bedazzled adolescence
Couch rugs and bulking throws no that doesn't make sense
My eyes they are magnets facing the south side
Turn them toward northwards and fears will subside
Lounged out lakeside I lay on my side
Grass green and bright white dandelion
Smells like summer sounds like bees buzzing
Wake up in Lysol to just about nothing
Plastic benches shared between strangers and friends
Shoot the shit wait for this ride to end
With numb guts and tight throats we speak of past lovers
But for me there's no plural I've never loved another
Infectious infatuations define my situation
Rainy soft smiles bring bitter elation
Grainy indie romance only in my dreams
Then not even,
when my dreams, they all snap at the seams
my dreams all snap at the seams
>>7673184
nah it's awful aha
Among books flung--
I reviled in her mouth naked
A mother long brown eyed
On the little beaches in july
With nothing to do
So I've been writing for about a year but only taking it seriously, 3-4 hours a day everyday. For the past few months. I feel like I've finally written, or will have after the edit, a really decent short story. But it is a MASSIVE rip off of raymond Carver's style with a pinch of lyricism. How much of an issue do we think this is?
>>7673129
Post it
Not one.
I don't know how to google docs and it's not edited. Here's the first scene.
On the drive up the fug of skunk smoke made talking difficult. It gummed up minds and made Paul cough into the silence.
âThis isnât the best driving conditionsâ he said.
Someone laughed but the road ate up all his attention and he couldnât work out who.
He wound down the window.
âOh my Godâ Pete said.
âShut up, itâs niceâ Pam said.
âYeah I know itâs just a bit of a culture shockâ.
âWere not in a cultureâ Tom said.
People laughed, they said a few more things about being in a culture: petri dishes; road trip movies, not many people caught on to each other, but everything got a little better.
Paul eyed the road.
Before all the noise his mind had been somewhere else, long didactic mixed media experiences.
Through the open window little strains of seagull calls got blown in with the wind.
âWere nearly there,â Paul said.
âAre we there yetâ Pam said.
Pete laughed.
âWeâll be there in about 5 minutesâ Paul said, he couldnât think of anything else to say.
The wind rushing in pushed the silence outside.
âIâm gonna make a Zoot for when we get there thenâ Tom said.
âOh my Godâ Pete said.
Is Bulfinch's Mythology a superior text to Edith Hamilton's Mythology? Or is there one that is better than either of them.
>>7673175
why tho
tfw thread ignored
Bulfinch's is much bigger, at least plus it covers Norse mythology and more "recent" material like King Arthur and Charlemagne. I think that Hamilton does a better job with the Greeks though. Get them both and compare.
Quick you must post your top 5 favourite books and reasons why.
Measure your dicks with the other posters of this thread.
Middlemarch
My Ăntonia
The Age of Innocence
Anthem
Gravity's Rainbow
Middlemarch, The Age of Innocence, and My Ăntonia are all beautifully written, with wonderful characters.
Anthem motivated me to stop relying on others for happiness.
Gravity's Rainbow is complex and just plain fun. I don't think any other book has made me laugh half as much as GR.
>Don Quixote
Dank adventure with some extremely memorable scenes, like Sancho's governing of the island.
>The Idiot
Dank characters, all of them. Good philosophical discussion. Ippolit made me sad and Myshkin's story of Marie made me cry.
>Brothers Karamazov
Great characters, best philosophical discussion, very good story.
>Crime and Punishment
Epilogue made me cry, interesting ideas of what a great man should be allowed to do, compelling plot
>Fathers and Sons
Ending in the graveyard made me cry. Very good scenes peppered throughout, Pavel's interactions with Bazarov are great
>>7673060
Is Anthem drily written like Rand's major works are reputed to be?
>>7673060
>The Cannibal
The imagery and overall sensibility of the book was very unique.
>Gravity's Rainbow
Really fun and packed with interesting bits of obscure information that it effectively uses to great effect.
>V.
Same as Gravity's Rainbow.
>A Confederacy of Dunces
Ignatius is practically me.
>The New York Trilogy
The way it deals with writing as a theme is unique and substantiative without being obnoxious or pretentious.
I pay a lot of attention to politics and one thing that bothers me is that when the subject shifts to economy I don't know what I'm talking about.
I'm scared of buying a random book (like pic related) and getting a really biased view.
Anyone got a good recommendation to get me started on economy literature?
>I'm scared of buying a random book (like pic related) and getting a really biased view.
any book you read will be biased. either read them all to sort out the bias, or accept the bias. btw manifesto will tell you literally nothing about marxian economics.
any intro macro econ is good
>I will teach you to be rich
>thinking fast and slow
The only two I needed.
I was looking to get an english audiobook copy of Timur Vermes' Look Who's Back from audiobook.com, but it turns out they don't have it.
So I have one free audiobook download from audiobook.com.
Anybody got a copy of Vermes' audiobook? I'll download whatever you need from audiobook.com
>paying for digital files
McFuckin kill yourself
>>7673004
I signed up for the free trial to get a free audiobook and will discontinue the membership before 30 days are up.
I once had a philo teacher who said books are we have the closest to necromancy, because we can talk with the dead and exist after our physical departure. Do you agree with this metaphor ?
>>7672994
Talking with the dead assumes it's a dialogue, reading is not.
>>7673001
It's a dialogue if you react to it.
That's essentially what Leibniz did with Locke in New Essays much after Locke died
>>7672994
Its a curse, desu.