Is The Unbearable Lightness of Being actually good or is it one of those "bluhhh I'm a bland grumpy white guy women are whores life is pointless or whatever" Bukowski-spittle type things
>>7742129
Well it's not anything like what you described but that doesn't necessarily mean it's good. You set up a false dichotomy.
>>7742129
The movie has tits
Which author is better: Gaddis or Gass?
Report /v/, /a/, /co/ & /tv/ posts Edition
Recommendations:
>Fantasy
http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/4chanlit/images/a/a8/1307836551252.jpg
(For the Computer illiterate) http://i.imgur.com/igBYngL
(4 the Plebs) http://imgur.com/oPLOaVO
http://imgur.com/hasKZsT
>Sci-Fi
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/4chanlit/images/a/a6/Scifilit.jpg
(For the Computer illiterate) http://i.imgur.com/gNTrDmc
http://imgur.com/r55ODlL
http://imgur.com/A96mTQX
>What are you currently reading?
>How has the recent thread disruptions from off topic posts affected you?
>How do you deal with it?
Old thread >>7727735
>>7731613
About to start the stars my destination
i haven't been in these thread for a while, what happen?
>>7731613
> Science Fiction and Fantasy General
>>7731613
>What are you currently reading?
The Mote in God's Eye
>How has the recent thread disruptions from off topic posts affected you?
they have upset me greatly
>How do you deal with it?
i retreat into escapist genre fiction
Hey, faggots. Learning The English language for 3 years now gave me the feeling of being way too simplistic and contextual. Not only the English classic literature written in it seems to me dry altogether, but also extremely fuzzy in terms of precision. No genders, diminutives for adjectives, free word order, etc. Also it happened to have a bad spelling with no rules whatsoever( or putting another way there are too much of them depending on what is the origin of a certain word). Why don't you all start learning the only divine language on the planet Earth, which is of course The Russian one? Just in case you wanna appreciate real literature in a real language, not in this banal lousy English.
Romance languages>everything
>>7748571
Spanish is one to compete with Russian imho
>>7748562
i find it hard to listen to anyone criticize another language that can't hide from being outed as ESL in their writing.
What does /lit/ think about sigmund freud?
Fixed Marilyn Monroe right up, great therapist
He is no Jung
Sigmund Fraud
Is she worth it? Give me your hot takes.
Takes are hotter if you are able to defend her changing her name.
http://www.cosmoetica.com/B556-DES481.htm
>>7748089
"one has to call a spade a spade"
that made me laugh. shame he qualified it as being not a racial slur after.
>>7748086
>Woman
>Worth it
nigga you serious
So what's /Lit/ view on having guns in a fantasy novel? Does it ruin the premise, or does it mix it up a bit?
>>7744665
need I even say it? Need I?
dosent really matter, whatever you add just make sure its consistent.
>>7744665
Well, the second amendment to the US constitution requires that books feature a gun at least once a chapter (either brandished or fired), so I guess, yes you need them.
20th century Russian literature doesn't get talked about much. What are the worthwhile authors from around 1920-2017
блaгoдapю!
Eugene Vodolazkin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JnCO0OlhlE
>>7739802
Tatyana Tolstaya
>>7739802
Read any history of the soviet union with a section on literature and you'll find no shortage of this. Hosking's "the first socialist society" is a great intro to many prominent 20th century russian writers, presented within a history of life in the ussr which quite frankly you'll need to understand what any 20th century Russian is writing about.
Bulgakov
Platonov
Akhmatova
Zoshchenko
Bely
>Asked about novelist David Foster Wallace...Bloom says, “You know, I don’t want to be offensive. But ‘Infinite Jest’ is just awful. It seems ridiculous to have to say it. He can’t think, he can’t write. There’s no discernible talent.”
>It’s all a clear indication, Bloom notes, of the decline of literary standards. He was upset in 2003 when the National Book Award gave a special award to Stephen King. “But Stephen King is Cervantes compared with David Foster Wallace. We have no standards left. [Wallace] seems to have been a very sincere and troubled person, but that doesn’t mean I have to endure reading him. I even resented the use of the term from Shakespeare, when Hamlet calls the king’s jester Yorick, ‘a fellow of infinite jest.’
>“It’s sort of a dark time. Imaginative energy I think is very difficult to summon up when there are so many distractions. There’s a kind of Grisham’s law [in literature]; the bad drives out the good.”
>>7747983
Bloom is a big fan of Gene Wolfe, from what i've heard.
>>7748000
That's not altogether surprising. Being pretty virulently anti-canon, I've never really put much stock in Bloom's opinions anyway (unless, of course, he happens to agree with my opinion, that is). No one has to like anything, but I do object to Bloom's specific remarks - "He can't think, he can't write. There's no discernible talent." What a blowhard.
where does he stand, really?
The dead can't stand, pal.
>discussion of his politics
>discussion of his theory
>discussion of where to start with his poetry
>no discussion of his poetry
C-L-A-S-S-I-C
>>7747969
where does he stand as a poet?
i've got him top 3, best of his era
>The protagonist is a writer with writer's block
>the protagonist is a woman with a woman's cock
>>7743551
>the protagonist is an alcoholic writer
>>7743555
>the protagonist puts girl dicks inside her
Hey /lit/ i barely come here, but i need some help
my boyfriend wants me to read to him while he is in bed, but i dont know what to read to him, anything you can recommend for me to read to him?
>>7739470
2666
everyone poops
infinete jest
finnegans wake
the ego and its own
Published writer here, ask me anything
Are you relevant enough for anyone in this image board to know who the hell are you?
>>7747530
Do you prefer honey nut cheerios to the original?
>>7747530
why you such a sellout bitch?
What are some books that talk about what life was like in the 1950's to early 60's?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ND3oghPL5M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK5jyVCdXwc
The only '50s/'60s-themed books I've read have satirized/criticized the culture of the time (White Noise, American Pastoral) rather than support it or present a romanticized vision of the time (though I would definitely be equally interested in reading something similar to your pic, OP).
>>7739975
Yeah, that's what I was afraid of. It seems like that sort of thing is a reaction to the era's presentation of itself in media. So we're just left with The Andy Griffith Show vs. Madmen as our only lenses with which to look back.
the era after it wanted to do nothing more than to poison the past; so hasty were they to cover their crime, so flushed with guilt, that they burned the library of alexandria almost completely to the ground, scattered the ashes, vowed never to speak of that time again
the 50s were, by and large, a happy, fruitful, peaceful, truly enlightened time. they represented the flowering of the dream of 2000 years of European civilization
however the greater the beauty, the more transient. no more ever again will it haunt our dreams; nobody believes in it anymore, it's the modern world's whipping goat. doesn't anybody notice that this conceals a terrifying anxiety—that our best days are already behind us, and that they died by our own hands?
I'd say some UFO diaries from the 50s and 60s give a taste of that time—but honestly, I'd recommend you just to turn back.
Too much reflection on that chapter of our past will make the present almost impossible to endure.
Let's have some reviews and discuss them.
He's not wrong.
>>7746579
That's kinda true, though.
Sometimes, I understand why people ironically support totalitarianism.
Lets have one of these /lit/
I'll start with one that's great and always gets posted and talked about but no edition has.
>>7736824
that's 10/10 actually, damn
>>7736828
It is. So much that I'm genuinely curious about how much a good quality custom edition of the book with this cover could cost.
>>7736824
man. that's just fucking incredible.
i like this one, but yours is hard to beat.