Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 3442. page

File: 1470600131981.gif (507KB, 250x216px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 250x216px

Shameless bump

>>30972200
>what particular qualities did the best of them and the worst of them have

Theyre all arrogantly incompetent.

>>30972523
you will salute me and call me sir

> t. butterbar

File: veryspecialforces.jpg (436KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 800x600px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQFxmAdyKcg

Hurry up bongman

File: 20160807_152608.jpg (631KB, 1132x1504px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 1132x1504px

>>30972011

>>30971161
A Mosin will eat any kind of x54R ammo you feed it.

>>30971161
She is not a picky eater, unlike PSL. Feed her and care for her.

>>30971182
Thanks, I have to wait 10 cuck days to pick it up but I'll post pics when I get it.

It looked like its been weathered a bit but it looked alright overall.

I cant wait, I'm fucking stoked

excuse me my Slavic friend, but you seem to have forgotten how submarines work. It doesn't matter if you hit the US if our subs send you back to the Stone Age.

>>30970586
Have you ever considered that the US and other militaries doesn't post the actual missile defense ratings in order to keep a level of top secrecy?

Why the fuck would you want your enemies to know you have weaknesses?

>>30970586
>A-235
Only something scribbled on a napkin by drunken russians to make themselves better over the massive utter failure that was the A-135.

Tell me when vatnikstan has something even remotely as capable as the AEGIS.

File: 1471109235583[1].jpg (75KB, 988x693px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 988x693px

also why the us sucks at shooting?

they're air rifles that are intended for the sole purpose of competition shoots. That is why they look so weird .

>>30970577
Because the olympics don't allow airstrikes or artillery bombardments.

Also, airguns are for fags. Unless you're removing tree niggers.

>>30970414
I don't own one

>>30970423
this

File: is4.jpg (780KB, 1920x1442px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 1920x1442px

litteraly perfect

File: Option.png (108KB, 880x693px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 880x693px

>>30969678
This was my first impression, maybe some of you can see better though. Gets pretty fucking sketchy near the laundry

>>30969678
Thats a nice layout, your route seems nice but I'd sweep down the hall first while keeping an eye on the living room and kitchen.


Like go left, cut 45degrees to the hallways and clear from left to right, back to walls the entire time.

File: Screenshot_2016-08-13-11-41-23.png (213KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1080x1920px

>>30970054
Something like this.

Ghettos would become Fallujah/Mosul tier problems, so any city with a significant ghetto should be avoided.

Texan cities (besides Austin) are well armed.

The NYPD is essentially a military force

>>30969458

New York isn't in a defensible position, cold war doctrine was that New York was not to be defended and was to be retaken by the 10th Mountain at a later date.

Honolulu

because its a shit idea

/thread end

Contrary to popular belief, there are usually weapons on board as well as trained personnel.

Also, there tend to be some security checks in place, though that depends of where the ship is coming from and where it is going.

>>30969363

I don't think so?

The only challenge is getting weapons aboard and I'm pretty sure the operation is so big and staff complacent enough you could manage it.

Power
Abundance of antitank weapons

>>30969219
Because we have vehicles that do it better.

>>30969240
Speaking of antitank weapons though; a metal object moving at high speed through a magnetic field will experience great force.
Couldn't one survive it with enough Teslas?
Of course, then it becomes a question of power unless it's a magnetic field that is only generated when something fast moves into it...

>>30968882
I think people overestimate your military capabilities and your actual power projection

>>30968907
I think so too but I dont think we're push overs either. Yes we sucked in ww2 but Id think we did alright in the korean war

>>30968882
Well, I'll be honest, Ding Dong, I wouldn't fuck with you guys just for your sheer numbers. You have, IIRC, the single largest population on Earth, and every adult member of that population is a trained soldier, and you have the weapons to arm them. You also seem to have plenty of farms and water and apparently the Three Gorges Dam produces quite a lot of power and I'm assuming you have others. You're damn near self-sufficient if the government rations things properly, so resource superiority doesn't look so great either. The only real chance any of us have at beating you is to either drown you in superior equipment or go full Korea and just hold the line until you run out of people.

>>30968824
>SA80
>piece of shit
>the M4 is somehow better than the bong rifle

okay summer.

Going to bite and actually answer your question with a logical answer; they won't until NATO adopts a new caliber from 5.56.

sage

>>30968853

op is a fag but the fact that their SAS opts for M4s over SA80s proves its shit.

I've fired both and the SA80 is unbelievably rear-heavy

I know they'll scrap the machinery if they haven't already but imagine if they did what the Portuguese did with their G3 stuff and sold it to Americans

File: 3731595.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

I don't care about the "STAWPIN POWAH" memes, or the capacity issues, 1911's are the sexiest pistols on the planet.

File: James J. Hill.jpg (40KB, 201x300px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 201x300px

>>30968497
>How come we have AR,AK and battle rifle generals, but never generals for handgun?

Why don't you stop being a fucking faggot and encouraging more board-ruining "general" threads that are literally nothing other than tripfag shitposting that usually isn't even related to the alleged subject.

>>30968520
How are generals board ruining? I think the clean up the place a little bit from shit threads constantly being posted asking for advice on this or that

Google it you fucking pleb.

>>30968410
It's one thing to know what firearms existed back then and another thing to know what was available you fag

File: 20160813_083659.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>30968408
Well lookeehere fag got its your lucky saturday. Straight from the 60s

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x1401px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1401px

Anyone ever take a course? I'm like 30 min from James Yaeger. I've thought about taking his course before. There's also a SWAT guy that does courses in Jackson for like $140

>>30968398
Maybe it's a sign that /k/ needs a break from /arg/ cancer.

>>30968420
>James Yaeger
Don't do it, you'll get the tires of your truck shot out