I've noticed on some boards on 4chan, specifically /v/, that there is a trend of anti intellectualism and critical thinking going on.
Take this thread for example;
>>>/v/379280994 (I would just link it using the thread number but copying and pasting isn't working for me right now)
On this thread, the OP managed to take an article on a topic, edit it to where it made it sound like it was 5 times worse than it actually was to the point where it was ridiculous (it's still a pretty bad law, but not to the point of complete ridiculousness), and managed to get 200+ replies on it. The problem is, despite the fact this law sounds ridiculous, almost nobody looked for the source article. One of the most important things that is taught to you in high school and college is to look for sources especially on topics like politics or stuff that sounds like borderline conspiracy theories. Yet almost nobody on this board did that, if people will automatically assume this thread was fully 100% true, what's stopping these same people from believing in full conspiracy theories knowing how gullible they are? Why is this trend in anti intellectualism and lack of sourcing/fact checking growing throughout the internet?
>>2917105
I don't think you understand how threads like that work, no one even cares about the subject matter it's just an excuse to shitpost, you'll notice most of the posts are like any other "is piracy wrong" bait threads /v/ and /tv/ have every day
>telling the truth online
>expecting othersn't to do likewise
>>2917121
there's a fineline between shitposting and believing one's own shitposting. that's how /pol/ meme work; what is alleged to be ironic is repeated so many times and sources are distorted to such an extent to fit meme (read: conspiracy) narratives that people come to relate to and then believe in the memes themselves.
If Young Earth is true, then how is it that objects in the universe are 13 billion light years away?
If light is not material, then how is it distance?
>>2917052
What?
>>2917052
checkmate atheists
>put a lot of research into WW2
>analyze it using geopolitics
>realize Hitler didn't make any serious strategic mistakes, and I would have followed pretty much the same path he did
When did you realize that Hitler did literally nothing wrong? I put a lot of thought into it, and the only to actually "win" WW2 would be the have different goals and ambitions, and thus effectively give up and negotiate when you had the upper hand.
But if he did that, it wouldn't Hitler's Germany. So Hitler could have won if he wasn't Hitler, which is an inane tautology.
>I DID A LOT OF REASEARCH
>I WOULD HAVE DONE THE EXACT SAME THINGS AS HITLER
nobody gives a shit about you, ok? nobody cares how much you "researched," nobody cares what you would do in some hypothetical impossible scenario. hell, nobody cares about what you actually do in your shitty real life. do your fucking homework or whatever and stop posting.
>>2917003
Yep, I agree. Hitler was an all-around genius.
>>2917045
why so angry, anon? did your mom take away your tendies?
I know this probably belongs on /v/ but I've never been on that board (nor will I) and this question is more related to history.
Creative assembly has announced that its making 2 Total War games with one being in a historical time period never done before.
What time period would you have it set in?
What map would you have?
What features would you have in it?
What would be the main factions?
I personally would have it from 1815-1914 with the tech tree progressing from Napoleonic line infantry to the opening stages of world war one with red pantaloons and bolt actions (as you progress war gets more violent).
Game play wise a more in depth alliance/ diplomacy system would be great facilitating empires such as scramble for Africa and hopefully by the end of the game you would have two alliances like entente and central waiting for war but not wanting it (in conjunction with tech tree advancements making war more violent). Also more focus on buildings as well as manpower so you can develop colonies and ultimately deploy colonial troops in the final conflict.
It would be a world map and the main factions would be the Great powers of Europe and the USA.
DLC could include scramble for Africa, US civil war, Russo-Japanese war, and Franco-Prussian war
If you don't approve this thread please sage it like the cancer it is but I figure its a welcome break from all the recent /pol/ shit on this board.
>>2916992
>What time period would you have it set in?
3 kingdoms era
>What map would you have?
china
>What features would you have in it?
incredible historical accuracy, modelling grain production including seasons and stores, trade in salt, silk and other goods a ruler can try to have a hand in, each with their own properties, supply routes, corruption, court politics and the values you instill in your subordinates, reputation throughout the country,
>What would be the main factions?
due to the realism, events play out as they would historically without scripted events as the Han dynasty crumbles, Liu Bei, Cao Cao and Sun Quan may not rise to rule the 3 Kingdoms but due to geography 3 polities will naturallyemerge in these regions with competition over Jing province and the northern plains having an advantage
>>2917078
I don't know much about Chinese history but i love your idea about grain production and stores.
Total war has always been lacking in depth of food security and it would be awesome if it could be legitimately used as a means to combat and defeat an enemy without having to confront him in conventional war.
Would their only be 3 factions though? (excuse my ignorance but I just assumed from the 3 kingdoms title)
b-boopy-b-bump?
Why is it the only Christian groups that see Miscegenation as sin are retarded white supremacists? Why are are Christians so eager to preach "anti-racism" (which they conflate with miscegenation) "love is love" "there is only one race the human race" when the people who care most about it are as fruitless as sodomites? Love=cum to these people. It just seems like a rejection of Logos to me. It's woven throughout the whole bible and the evil of it can be seen in it's effects and in the hearts of its most adamant supporters. they always end up doing mental gymnastics to deny Miscegenation is sin the same way you can see some gays denying homosexual is abomination. segregation is natural and gods will. ( and not 2nd class citizen/separate bathroom segregation but national ethnic borders) do they not have faith in the doctrine that everyone is held to the same standard under God? the excessive race denial just galvanizes people to become filled with hubris about their people.
>>2916792
>segregation is God's will
>The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”
Anon, I don't know why you would think segregation is God's will. Literally no mental gymnastics are needed to point out that the entire narrative celebrates the unification of God's people. If anything you would have to bend like a pretzel in order to extract any narrative that suggests segregation is God's will when every element in the narrative points to a unification under the proper foundation which is righteousness. If the man is remotely right in heart, doesn't matter the race. I can't even begin to understand or see how you could extract otherwise.
>>2916792
That's a nice pic of a thermal bath with guys flexing muscles
>>2916827
yes God wants one big globalist state where everyone dies in each other on earth.
God wants everyone to be Christian and follow his law which includes the segregation of peoples.
My question is which European empire left their colonies in the best state and which in the worst?
For the UK Singapore and Hong Kong are gud along with their white colonies of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand but their african colonies are mixed with Rhodesia being formally ok, South Africa being meh but places like Sudan, Sierra Leone, Nigeria ect all being very poverty stricken and India/ Pakistan having huge wealth disparity.
Is there any European 19th century empire that left its colonies in an amazing state and which of them their colonies in the worst shape.
Thanks boyz, plz no /pol/ baiting "le blacks ruined colonies" memes.
>>2916676
Best colonies were the ones with the least natives or where they were slaughtered, like USA, South Africa and Singapore
>>2916676
French African colonies were decent and generally are pretty stable with a few exceptions. They all keep a close relationship with France to this day so they don't seem upset about the past. Especially Algeria, which the French tried to make an official state of France.
French colonies in Indochina fared much worse though and the French generally treated them worse.
>>2916733
>French African colonies were decent and generally are pretty stable with a few exceptions. They all keep a close relationship with France to this day so they don't seem upset about the past.
BECAUSE FRANCE KEEPS USING COUPS TO KEEP THEM PRO FRENCH GOVERNMENTS POWER
France is half the reason West Africa is so fucking shit.
People who defend their behavior make my stomach turn.
which makes Islam harder to reform or reinterpret
which makes it more violent today?
what are these structural differences?
>>2916669
It was always worse than Christianity in princeable.
Islam is hard to reform because most of the middle east is both poor and a geopolitical nightmare
You got it wrong. Islam is easier to reinterpret because it's not just the Quran, there are also Hadiths. Basically there are reports that people can choose to believe or not. Violent Islamics choose to believe in the most violent Hadiths.
It also doesn't help that the last written chapter of the Quran is the most violent. The reverse is true for the Bible, with the New Testament being way less bloodthirsty.
What is behind the locked door at The Padmanabhaswamy Temple that needs to be kept hidden so badly?
The ring of the incarnate
>>2916632
the guest bedroom
Gold.
>Napoleon couldn't conquer Russia
>Hitler too
>Lenin could
>Yeltsin could
Is the only way to beat a big ass country is bt undermining it from within? Would it be the same with America (has it already happened in history)?
Rurik, Ogedei, and Ludendorff all conquered Russia so it's obviously possible to beat them from the outside
>>2916461
When the fuck is this "Le Russia is invincible" meme die?
>>2916461
russia is a shithole, why are people obsessed with conquering that stupid freezer?
If Hitler had invaded Russia in a two pronged attack, one around the North and one around the South with the aim of seizing their industrial production in the Ural Mountains would this have worked better?
I heard he originally planned to do this but due to an illness lost influence as this decision was made.
Was it a better strategy?
>>2916429
How about actually collaborating with Japan and launching a nine-pronged attack, including the Arctic seas?
He fucked up by not having the grand mufti convince the Turkics to revolt against the Soviets and join the fight in exchange for their independence. If they were attacked on all sides they would've stood no chance
>>2916429
Germany could never had defeated the USSR
Tfw now that country is in NATO, all the media uncritically tow the NATO line almost like a mirror image of what communist news reporting and censorship was described to be.
If it werent for the internet you wouldn't even know that Saudi Arabia has Invaded Yemen and is massacring it's people
I never asked for this.
Tfw now that country is in NATO, all the media uncritically tow the NATO line almost like a mirror image of what communist news reporting and censorship was described to be.
If it werent for the internet you wouldn't even know that Saudi Arabia has Invaded Yemen and is massacring it's people
I never asked for this.
Black Mountain?
Poland here. West propaganda started in the 80s when USA sponsored Solidarność. I think the same thing is happening right now in Venezuela.
In Poland "left" and "right" media both present Putin as Satan. We now have 3,5 thousand US troops and more coming. Politicians accuse each other of connections to Kreml in the meantime Boeing is storming our public contracts without auctions.
Should have created Central European Commonwealth when USSR collapsed. But they played us right - from one Imperial hands to another.
>>2916516
>In Poland "left" and "right" media both present Putin as Satan.
It's not because Poland is a member of NATO, but because Russia has done a lot of harm to Poland in the recent past, so it is natural that most Poles view Russia negatively
Who made the best aircraft of WW2, and why is it Hawker?
Also best anti-tank cannons
>>2916145
please, if you don't have a jet, you simply don't have the best plane of WW2.
It's sad how Brits desperately tried to make a single good looking single seat fighter, and yet never did
Aside from the griffon spits maybe
>tfw judaism isn't expansionistic so the world is stuck with religions like islam and protestantism
it's not fair!
>noahidism doesnt have a thriving community.
Why live?
>>2916086
I don't see a problem here, a race based religion can't be good.
>>2916124
People want to feel special and important, not like a bunch of 2nd rate cucks.
Mari was a powerful city state in today Eastern Syria, dating around the 3rd millenium bc/early 2nd, these people were no joke, they were rich, renown, and apparently...
Black.
I was astonished where I found this beautiful painting of theirs, they look exactly like black people / African Americans
Pic related looks exactly like Lando from Star wars
>>2916045
They look arabic/indian.
>>2916045
So do afrocentrists think brown people don't exist or is it just Black and White to them?
>>2916045
UHM ACKTUALLY THE SUMERIANS WERE BLACK
THE AKKADIANS WERE BLACK
THE CHINESE WERE BLACK
THE BLACK WERE BLACK
THE CELTS WERE BLACK
THE UYGHUR WERE BLACK
THE GREEKS WERE BLACK
THE CRETANS WERE BLACK
>tfw you realize America is literally a G*rman colony.
Explains why they love warmongering and Imperialism so much. Even the Cheeto Benito that rules over them is a G*rman immigrant.
>Cheeto Benito
fluck brumpfy
>self reported
>>2915851
Hardly anyone lives in those majority-German counties, and you can be basically file anyone reporting "American" ethnicity under British. Still though, they are the second most common ancestry group in the country after the Brits.
1. British/"American"
2. German
3. African-American
4. "Irish"
5. Mexican