Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 681. page

Google it yourself.

who invented the paper aeroplane? did he not see the potential?

If only they allowed him the tail...

Do kids these days have cartoons that can come even close in terms of creativity of the old 90s stuff? Genuinely curious. Animaniacs were great too.

>>3026751
Not that I know of.

>>3026498
Probably by allying with Qin and backstabing them latter, but it's quite a risky move.

>>3026427
you fucking inbred monkey you must be a 6 year old autist to think that they were even remotely similar both economically or politically.

Kill yourself.

I'VE BEEN LOOKIN' FOR FREEDOM

>>3026813
>Not instantly getting the reference
There's only one 6 year old in this thread, and it's not OP.

>>3026349

Not enough of a European power base. When push comes to shove, the Portugese didn't have the muscle. Didn't help that they fell under Spainish rule for a while.

They also fucked themselves by signing the treaty of Tordesillas without knowing how much shit was west of that line. Their other colonies didn't have a heavy portugese presence themselves, and the Dutch out-competed them.

The Dutch in return were supplanted by the British, who implemented much more direct involvement and had more european settlers.

>>3026380
do you tink tordesillas was a bad deal? they got brazil from it, which is more than they were probably even expecting. Would trump not approve?

>>3026403

Tordesillas is an exceptionally bad deal, just look at which parts of the Americas speak spainish and which parts speak Portugese.

Furthermore, the Spainish used Tordesillas to justify a conflict in Indonesia. Since they were "west" of the tordesillas line.

>>3026316
Only if you're reading the OT. There's less war destruction in the NT but it's the core of the Christian faith unless you're a radical of some type.

That's old testament stuff

New is the expected part

>>3026416
>>3026538
Its all the same God and honestly I didn't find the NT very hopeful either. It seemed like salvation was incredibly more difficult than what most Christians believe and it seemed like James and Paul couldn't get the doctrine straightened out. Meanwhile I read things like how the beast of the earth would cause "All" (followed by extensive list of categories of people) to receive the Mark and then how that category (containing practically everyone) would be cast into hell. Not to mention even apart from that there is the Lukewarm Church that Jesus spits into hell. Its like at that point who is going to be saved? Meanwhile I'd been thinking about how a vast majority of anyone who ever lived lacked specific revelation and was therefore basically predamned. And then I went to the OT for the possible answers and it was about a bunch of Jews raping and pillaging and ethnically cleansing their way through the desert and everyone getting BTFO by God on the regular. So ultimately I went in true fedora fashion and systematically destroyed this world view for myself. The 6 months I spent engaged with Christianity was overall a horrifying experience.

If I got to hell, is that really remarkable? I was probably going anyway, everyone else is going and of course lets not forget the last should be the first.

>>3026210
They didn't think of them

File: princelies.webm (2MB, 640x358px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x358px

>>3026210
>What did the Nazis think of him? I've been wondering this for a solid while now - did the Christian Nazis view (presumably) Ramses II as a villain like the bible paints him? Or as a hero, for enslaving the Jews and opposing their strive at every turn?

The National Socialists knew the Hebrew Bible was nonsense and their brand of Christianity (called "positive Christianity") didn't include it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf5lxaVrUgA

Ramses II was likely not the pharaoh of exodus. also the narrative of exodus is euphemistic and to take it literally you have to be a brain damaged to take everything so literally.

but honestly they probably didn't think of him, or mention it in the case it might inspire some sense of morality towards jews or something. or invoked "the pharaoh" in some sense of rally, who the fuck knows but they may have just skipped over the trouble it brought.

>>3025650

How common is lactose tolerance among the Slav race? That should answer your question

>>3025657
What? Do you think lactose tolerance is an exclusively germanic trait?

>>3025593
Please kill yourself.

>>3025593
Fucking lel

>>3025568
At least if my law school was any indication, they'll all get mentioned, but they won't all get even treatment. That being said, it's more to do with your individual professor for an individual course than anything to do with the school itself. Back when I was 1L, I had back to back professors, a torts guy who would rant about how when people say "tort reform", they really mean gutting the rights of victims of personal injury cases, and then after him a contract professor, who would talk about how the tort system is ridiculously generous with compensation in comparison to the more "reasonable" contract penalty system, and that tort reform is a necessity.

Bear in mind, by the way, that if you're limiting your judicial philosophies to constitutional law, you won't get all that much traction; while it grabs headlines, it's not actually a huge part in the usual law program. You will get it, probably in your second semester in your first year, but unless you start taking specific courses in more specialized conlaw fields, that's probably the only time you'll really run into it.