Was there much of an administrative hand over the land that Alexander conquered? Did the land he captured respect his rule? Or were the settlements from Egypt to India left alone to do their own thing? Did they even notice the change of kings? It seems like a lot of land to manage
there was little change
alexander maintained satrap system almost everywhere
there we many rebelions during his march to the east ans missmanagements (the first satrap of egypt and Harpalus)
>>3015749
He lost india really quickly. and his empire fragmented into different kingdoms closely after his death.
>tfw eternal anglo destroyed the ottoman civilization
>>3015740
>be Turkish
>fill half a box of Turkish delight with lemon flavour when I just want to rose ones
Fucking savages, good riddance.
>>3015740
Well, at least Ataturk made a worthy nation on it's remains.
>>3015751
the lemon is good though
First time poster here, and didn't see any threads on the American Revolution so I thought I would start a new thread.
I live close to park dedicated to the battle of Saratoga.
In school we were obviously taught a lot about the battle, but when I asked about any archaeology going on in the battlefield itself, The answer was usually along the lines of "Not wanting to disturb any earthworks/fortifications that might still be there."
This doesn't make much sense to me, as I'd figure any items discovered would be much more useful or valuable than mounds of dirt.
Is this common practice for archaeology in most places of history? Being fearful of disturbing long gone fortifications?
In general, yes. It's not always related to preserving fortifications, but archaeological practices usually take preservation into account because of how destructive archaeology is. Essentially, when you excavate a site, you destroy it. Once it's dug up, its data potential is entirely gone. So researchers usually only excavate parts of a site to preserve things they don't want to destroy.
With something like the site you're talking about, it's probably a matter of what people who have looked at it think they can actually learn about the site. The battle was documented pretty well historically (especially small details through things like letters), and an excavation probably wouldn't reveal very much new information. So they decided it wasn't worth destroying part of a well-known historical site to learn things they probably already knew.
That was something I hadn't really considered, but now it seems pretty obvious; The revolution wasn't all that long ago compared to other points of history.
Thanks for the reply.
>>3016011
I feel like I should point out that when something happened doesn't necessarily have an affect on how archaeologically interesting a site will be, or how much can be learned from it. Until the past few decades, most things weren't recorded and pretty important things can be learned from most places which can be considered archaeological sites. That goes for Saratoga as well. I'm sure if an excavation was done, some pretty interesting things might be discovered (see some of the excavations on Civil War sites or the Little Bighorn for example), but that possibility has be weighed against destroying something that's seen as a key part of American history. Because as much as most people want to know about the battle was written down, it's not hard to see why that choice went the way it did.
>tfw Spaniards destroyed Mezoamerican civilization
What event/war influenced or kickstarted the blue vs red antagonism ? The hundred years war ? The cold war ? How come the red is always depicted as the evil ( Alright, England and the Soviets were in the wrong during both exemples )
>>3015653
It's the color of blood
Blue is the color of the sky
>>3015656
You didn't answer the question anon, where does this antagonism come from ?
>>3015653
How do you get into the Bard?
>>3015460
Buy him a drink first
What a nice girl
William "Dixie town? Burn it down" Sherman
Was Jesus really the good guy?
There are no good guys or bad guys in history. But he's the one that came closest to being the big good of the world
>>3015404
That nail had a family
>>3015404
Why do we pretend Jesus did nothing wrong? He blasphemed on the G-d that created the universe. He claimed to be the Messiah. Everyone knows the Mashiach isn't supposed to reveal himself.
>"He who knows doesn't tell, he who tells doesn't know."
Why on all of the eternal Anglo posts is Cecil Rhodes never posted? He's like the perfect Anglo bad guy.
Because to acknowledge him would be to acknowledge our incredible success.
Because the only people who got pwnt by him were niggers
He has a fat face and droopy nose.
Was secession from the Union originally intended and understood to be legal, or did the framers of the Constitution consider it to fall under insurrection? Was Salmon's ruling in Texas v. White legally sound?
As much as possible, I'd like to separate this from specific circumstances like the bombardment of Fort Sumter but I realize the only test case for secession is impossible to disentangle from wider issues.
>>3015123
From the language of the articles and constituion it seems that most foinding fathers saw the union as a perminent arrangment. However, thw founding fathers are unanimous and so did believe that succession was a legal right.
The wording of the constirution was not clear and the legality of succession was not decided by the supreme court, but rather by military action.
>laying in bed about to sleep
>quickly remember to do my nightly round of Africa shitposting
>make blatant shitpost threads about africa hoping for it to devolve into /pol/ tier shitposting
>wake up
>mfw 3 of them actually gained traction
>>3014971
Same, its fun desu
>I was only pretending Afrocentrists are retarded
ok bud
>>3014971
Why did only 3 of the africa threads gain traction on /his/? Did they fear the black shitposter?
What's your opinion of him, /his/? I feel like he doesn't get as much credit as he deserves.
>>3014965
Seemed all right until his massive spergout after Piendmonte-Sardinia held up its end of the Bargain to the French.
>>3014965
he took land away from the pope so fuck him
Why did he have to die?
Why do we have to die?
What's the benefit from studying history other than the "learning from past mistakes"?
>>3014875
Learning from past successes?
>>3014921
Getting a cushy job as a school teacher where you can bitch and moan about how hard you have it to your union buddies in between strikes and your months of paid holidays.
>>3014875
You learn how the world works, and why the things you see around you are.
It also becomes more difficult for people to bullshit you with lies in order to get you to vote/behave/work/worship a particular way.
Why is there Slovenia? Just what the fuck is ISIS, and how do you fight it? Why the fuck are Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio even a part of American politics? What the fuck did my neighbor mean when he said my street was lined with Sears homes?
Without studying history, you don't fucking know anything.
Tell me something about this great man, /his/
>>3014433
He was great.
Not many people are gonna recognize him from a photo though, he's to obscure for that today.
Didn't he and leader of Sudan have some form of dialogue at Khartoum where he was asked to surrender and he replied with some quote about being remembered through history or some shit.
If anyone can find and post that quote I'll be much obliged.