How accurate is this?
>>3026316
Only if you're reading the OT. There's less war destruction in the NT but it's the core of the Christian faith unless you're a radical of some type.
That's old testament stuff
New is the expected part
>>3026416
>>3026538
Its all the same God and honestly I didn't find the NT very hopeful either. It seemed like salvation was incredibly more difficult than what most Christians believe and it seemed like James and Paul couldn't get the doctrine straightened out. Meanwhile I read things like how the beast of the earth would cause "All" (followed by extensive list of categories of people) to receive the Mark and then how that category (containing practically everyone) would be cast into hell. Not to mention even apart from that there is the Lukewarm Church that Jesus spits into hell. Its like at that point who is going to be saved? Meanwhile I'd been thinking about how a vast majority of anyone who ever lived lacked specific revelation and was therefore basically predamned. And then I went to the OT for the possible answers and it was about a bunch of Jews raping and pillaging and ethnically cleansing their way through the desert and everyone getting BTFO by God on the regular. So ultimately I went in true fedora fashion and systematically destroyed this world view for myself. The 6 months I spent engaged with Christianity was overall a horrifying experience.
If I got to hell, is that really remarkable? I was probably going anyway, everyone else is going and of course lets not forget the last should be the first.
>>3026316
OT was metal as fuck.