Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 615. page

>>3082482
0/10

>>3082487
t. christard with two adopted niglets

If Christianity is wrong then why would God exist?

>>3082478
Even now ainu in Japan pretend to be japanese to avoid ostracism

>>3082491

They are Japanese ethnically.

>>3082491
Japanese = Yamato
Yamato = Yoyoi + Jomon people

Why do some of them look Caucasoid anyway?

>>3082435
bump this shit if your not a carthage fag

>>3082435
Just imagine two Roman soldiers talking on the beach how they'll get to Sicily and all of a sudden the Carthaginian ship beaches itself near by.

>>3082544
they probably praised the fuck out of Neptune or Fortuna

Which historians say this?

There is no moment when one ceases to be a child and becomes an adult. It is a process which occurs over a developmental time period, like a neat curve on a graph. Of course it is necessary to assume that as soon as you reach a certain age you are an adult for legal reasons, but childhood and adulthood aren't fixed in reality. There is no definition, outside of law, of what it means to be a child or an adult.

>>3082371
Apparently childhood as a stage didn't exist until the 16th century(Aries). A few others say until the early modern period in the 18th and 19th centuries when psycology started growing.

ayo dis monarchy shit real baller yknowwamsayin ?

da reel quaaan of englund

>>3082295
My question is, is this true /his/?

Was there an African Queen of England?

>>3082172

>Where did the "mechanized and modern german war machine :DD 14/88 O/" come from?
Mostly from early war allied commanders, who could point to technical "superiority" of the Germans for a reason for their victory, as opposed to organizational reasons. The former can't really be their fault, the latter most definitely can. Plus, the Germans had very effective armored doctrine, which to a layman with limited ability of military matters, is hard to grasp. If you hear

>German tanks outperformed French tanks in Fall Gelb
most people instantly assume that the German tanks were either more numerous or superior machines, if not both, rather than the Germans finding a superior niche as an exploitation vehicle instead of an artillery support vehicle the way the French were using them, nor are they likely to believe that differences in tactics and doctrine can overcome numerical and technological deficits like that.

I would also remind you that aside from the Americans, Canadians, and New Zealanders, every major power in WW2 had most of their second echelon supply work being done by trains for rail lines and horses away from those rail lines. The Nazis might not have been the mechanized super-state that the wehraboo claims, but they weren't behind the curve either.

>They had more horses than Polacks and Ruskies in their entire army.
True for the Poles, not for the Soviets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horses_in_World_War_II#Germany

>The German Army entered World War II with 514,000 horses,[13] and over the course of the war employed, in total, 2.75 million horses and mules;[16] the average number of horses in the Army reached 1.1 million.

>In total the Red Army employed 3.5 million horses.

I don't see this view held by anyone besides those who have the most babby-tier understanding of the war.
Even Band of Brothers recognized it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_DnRn9hyFU

File: Rasputitsa-4-January-1942.jpg (455KB, 1200x1050px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 1200x1050px

>>3082172
There's also the misconception that the speed of early German successes was solely the result of mechanization rather than tactics. In reality, Auftragstaktik (mission command) meant German units could operate, adapt, and pursue objectives by themselves rather than waiting for specific orders. This is also why the attrition of NCO's and lower ranking officers so severely affected the Wehrmacht in the East.

EUTHANIZE HER.

10/10 would remove merchant and kebab and find her some gold

>>3082125
Sin Isabel, tu país siempre sería sangriento pagano matándose. Ella trajo la civilización a su "gente", si no a tu,tu frijolero estúpido

File: a34.jpg (28KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 657x527px

>>3082116
Praise Kek in hell Platonist scum!

John Greene pls

I watched the Alain de botton video about him, did I miss much?

>>3082072
Well Lichentein was so small it was basically irrelevant, luxembourg might've had some utility in widening the border with france, however it spoke its own language, had it's own customs and had essentially became distanced from the culture of Prussia, and came closer to the countries in the Benelux.

>>3082072
He feared the Swiss warrior

Unifying with Austria meant that the Habsburgs would have a very large role in the new Germany, and thus mitigate Otto Von Bismarcks own power.

File: Rebels-CAR.jpg (52KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 620x465px

>>3081994

It's actually "Monegasque."

>>3081838
One would guess they were simply waiting for the Grimaldi line to die out. France was (still is actually) set to absorb the principality in such an eventuality.
Nowadays, well there's no real reason to give a shit. Monaco is a convenient tax haven just like Andorra, Luxembourg, Lchtenstein and San Marino, people in power are more than happy to be able to spread their wealth around among them.
Also the Grimaldis are basically going out of their way to keep the line alive, I mean I'm pretty sure they died out like twice in the male line already.

>>3081838
They didn't know it existed. It's like finding an old spider web but you don't want to bother destroying it because the spider is tiny anyway

>>3081785
>not posting this in the humor thread

File: 14995694980121.jpg (18KB, 200x306px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 200x306px

>1682 AD

>>3081785
literally the face every girl makes when I drop my pants

t. Turk

File: 1498780412579.jpg (30KB, 399x386px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 399x386px

Damn that clip was kino. Gonna watch this documentary, thanks OP

File: 1484341240177.png (44KB, 658x662px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 658x662px

>Soviets lost in Afghanistan
Name a bigger modern tragedy

>>3081827
The Red Army won the Russian Civil War.

Their control of Ireland's economic policies prevented the ports from being closed, which allowed food to continue to be exported in the midst of widespread starvation.

In addition, Anglo-Irish farmers controlled all of the good land, and relied on military protection from the British to allow them to keep exporting food without the caravans being seized by starving peasants.

The Irish famine shared characteristics with Holodomor, in that in both cases the country experiencing the famine was producing enough food to feed itself, and in both cases the starvation was directly caused by foreign occupation.

It wasn't a genocide, but it was a fine example of why classical economics is dogshit.

>>3081632
>both cases the starvation was directly caused by foreign occupation
Am I forgetting something, when did Soviet Union was occupied by someone?

>>3081841
Ukraine was occupied by Ruskies.

>>3081581
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCbqVkjIZA8

>>3081581
if black people are so smart, then why did yakub invent white people?
checkmate niggy

>actual answer

1)Either increasingly conquered by the Arabs and thus the exact same history but with Arab colonials or
2)African tribes that have access to the ocean and can get trade with Europe and thus conquer the non-coastal Africans. We would view Africa the same way as south-east Asia and Europe would have primarily used them in launching proxy wars with the Ottomans as Sub-Saharan Africans would be antagonistic to Arab encroachment.