Can /his/ tell me why anyone would want to be a humanist?
>>3079761
>why would a human want to adopt a philosophy that privileges humans?
because they are human?
It's a reactionary stance to theism. It takes the better and makes it look worse.
>>3079779
Humanism does no such thing. Humanism dehumanizes.
>muslims will demolish the Parthenon within your lifetime
>>3079673
The Turks won't allow it to be destroyed
>>3079673
>tfw Western Civilization will fall in your lifetime
>>3079673
They didn't do it when they controlled it
So what is the difference between a cult and a religion?
>>3079448
Popularity
>>3079448
Okay this one sold me on this meme.
>>3079448
Abuse and control of its members.
It triggers me so much when they say "Greece, the birthplace of Western Civilization" in history documentaries.
Western Civilization started during renaissance Western Europe. Fully formulated in revolutionary France.
Ancient Greeks literally had nothing to do with Western Europe. It was the Arabs that kept Greek ideas alive, not plebian medieval era Western Europeans.
>>3079402
>Western Civilization started during renaissance Western Europe
Does that mean Rome also not part of western civilisation?
>>3079402
bait
>>3079402
>Western Civilization started during renaissance Western Europe. Fully formulated in revolutionary France.
Is there realistic possible way that Hitler and Stalin could have actually have an alliance?
>>3079348
yeah if both of them were fascist
>>3079348
but they did
>>3079361
Its another OP is a complete moron thread
Are the Polish the most Pious people in the world?
in modern day europe, sure
>>3079203
Nope.
In reality Polish piety is nonexistent. Polish religious beliefs boil down to rituals and declarations. In fact Polish actual beliefs are a hodgepodge of everything that could pop into mind. Most Polish catholics don't even know what the Trinity is, and really a big number of them believes in horoscopes and other stuff.
This reflects how in fact Poland was christianised. The Polish peasants were forced by a tip of the lance to declare themselves Christians, go to the mass and observe the lent. On the other hand no one given a fuck what said peasants actually believed in.
>>3079499
This. My grandma who lived in a sleepy village was very religious because they said her memorized prayers all the time and was every day on the mass. Yet, I think she didn't know that God and Mary were separate entities. She even referred to God in feminine form "Bozia".
What caused Brazil to decline?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_Brazil
>>3079088
they didn't manifest destiny like the USA did
they also started breeding with their chimpanzees so that probably didn't really help
>>3079088
Pedro II was literally the only good thing about Brazil that was keeping things moving. He leaves for a doctors appointment and his daughter mindlessly writes a decree that ends up with a military coup which has fucked over Brazil for centuries.
>>3079088
They're actually on the rise and projected to become a superpower. Or at the very least be on par with US, China and Russia.
/ig/ Idealism General
This is a thread for the discussion of Idealism, Consciousness and Being.
QUICK RUNDOWN
>Dr. Godehard Bruentrup: What Is Idealism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDR5i6z4L8c
>In philosophy, idealism is the group of philosophies which assert that reality, or reality as we can know it, is fundamentally mental, mentally constructed, or otherwise immaterial.
ENCYCLOPEDIA ENTRIES
>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism/
>Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/idealism/v-1
ACADEMIC ARTICLES
>Eliminating the Physical
https://philpapers.org/rec/ELLETP-2
>A New Epistemic Argument for Idealism
https://philpapers.org/rec/SMIANE-2
>How To Avoid Solipsism While Remaining An Idealist
https://philpapers.org/rec/HENHTA
BOOKS
>George Berkeley-Principles of Human Knowledge
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4723/4723-h/4723-h.htm
>George Berkeley-Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4724/4724-h/4724-h.htm
>John Foster-A World For Us: The Case for Phenomenalistic Idealism
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=0DB12BBA4A197862E272211B7A059880
YOUTUBE
>The Introspective Argument:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l1lQMCOguw
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4DyfIsj8FU
>Dr. David Chalmers explains why materialism is false
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdbs-HUAxC8
>Why substance dualism is roundly rejected in contemporary philosophy of mind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVbG90kr1B0
>>3079036
what are the benefits of this ideology? before I permanently fuck up my mind
>>3079053
>implying truth is not intrinsically valuable
It's not about ideology its about truth. Follow the argument and you arrive at Idealism.
Substance Dualism is laughed at nowadays.
The idea of a ghost in the machine absurd giving the interactions of mind and brain. Destroy a part of the brain and you destroy conscious mechanisms. If the mind were like a ghost piloting the machine then the ghost should remain intact whether the machine is damaged.
However, people take this to imply materialism/physicalism: that we are nothing more than our physical makeup and our mind is either housed in our brains (almost like dualism) or is identical to our brains and/or its functions. This is a non-sequitur. This only implies that substance dualism is false.
More to come on materialism/physicalism (from here on known as physicalism)
>use the same encryption code for more than two decades
>can't defeat malnourished chinese peasants fighting each other
>base their entire strategy on the idea one battle can win a whole war
>fail to deliver a declaration of war before an attack that had been scheduled years in advance
>start off trying to sink ships in a fucking shallow-water harbor
>an aircraft carrier gets through all of their lines of defense and raids the capital city without any causalities
>plan to "lure" enemy carriers into midway despite knowing these same carriers have fucking radars
>their secret codename for Midway Island was literally "M.I."
>know after midway defeat is inevitable but keep fighting anyway
>built the world's largest battleship but too scared to send it into battle
>send their few remaining pilots into suicide missions
>nuked twice
>unconditional surrender
>lets foreign power write a fucking constitution
>still proud of it all because muh honurrrr
And people make fun of Italy...
>>3078965
Like many of the old generals said "The young will feed off the old's success until they fall on the road and not know how to get back up."
>>3078965
>Declare war on Germany in order to defend Poland
>Don't actually defend Poland
>Claim you'll help defend France who also said they'd help Poland and wouldn't
>Act like you'll help France but actually don't
>Hide on your Island getting bombed until America shows up
>Follow America around
>Bomb innocent women and children
>Make some Operation plans that go fucking awful
>America needs to take charge
>America and Russians win the war
>America makes you no longer a global power some years later
>Claim you did everything because you "fought" the longest
>Let's launch an offensive across a river into a mountain range, it worked the previous 11 times
>>3078965
Eh, the theory of decisive battle hadn't really been disproven at that point, and the Japanese experience at Tsushima backed it up.
Stoicism is baby's first philosophy and not even a good one at that
>>3078959
its the only philosophy that I try subscribe to , its got to be one of the hardest
it's /pol/-tier, whether that's a good thing is up to you
Why didn't the Irish conquer Ulster?
Did they fear the British warrior?
Britain has nukes, is a member of nato, and has a military budget literally 50 times larger than Ireland's.
>>3078937
if the Irish used civil disobedience instead of force then all of the British woman would have supported its independence
but no they had to form the IRA and started using car bombs
Did the Spartan hoplites exist during the Roman conquest of Greece? Did they fight against Roman legions? How did they fare?
>>3078933
they had more trouble with the homoerotic Corinthian's than they did the Spartans , the Spartans didn't have any numbers
>>3078933
Sparta got BTFO by Thebes and their Sacred Band (an elite unit of 600 gays), and became a second tier power overnight.
By the times the Romans conquered Greece, Sparta was a small city. However, the city was rejuvenated by Romans who were interested in the history and mythos of old Sparta, and the natives basically wewuzzed themselves into something resembling prosperity by catering to the Romans.
>>3078933
no, the Spartan military system had already been destroyed by the time Rome took over Greece. It was only possible to have a class of full time warriors because they were supported by their helot slaves. But when Thebes defeated Sparta they forced them to free the helots which made their way of life no longer possible. Their numbers had also been so badly reduced that Sparta was little more than a village.
As the other anon said when Rome took over they had a huge interest in Sparta because of its history so paid for it to be rebuilt as something of a tourist site with Spartans making a living as what we might now consider to be historical reenactors. Later on they were even fully subsidized by Rome to rebuild their ancient traditions of the Spartan military system in return for fighting in the roman army. Caracalla even raised a unit solely of soldiers from Sparta and armed them with the traditional weapons and armor of Spartan Hoplites and put them in his vanguard against the Parthians. That might be the only time in history when military reenactors actually fought in war.
>"Holy"
>"Roman"
>"Empire"
>>3078929
Why did Germany develop into a huge amount of tiny fiefdoms before unification? France, UK, never had anything like this.
>>3078982
>France, UK, never had anything like this
>>3079030
This.
Flanders had a lot of wars with the French king and was basically independent from the start.
Was Stalin the only dictator of the USSR?
To what degree was the Soviet government democratic before 1927 and after 1953?
How did Lenin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, etc share their power?
Stalin wasn't a dictator. Read J Arch Getty. He's a liberal historian from Louisiana, hardly sympathetic to Communism or Stalinism. Yet after thoroughly reading archival documents, he was forced to admit Stalin was not a dictator. In his analysis, the purges were a result of competing local officials turning on each other, and the central government being too weak to prevent them.
>>3078889
Stalin and Lenin (towards the end) had popular support but were dictators, everyone after had below ~50% approval but was technically put in in place through a democratic process except Khrushchev who is just hated all around
>>3078914
Interesting. You got any excerpts?
>tfw America destroyed Soviet civilization
>>3078887
Know your place, Ivan.
>>3078887
>tfw America destroyed civilization
>>3078887
and America will turn Bolshevik , how ironic