I'll start.
Good - pretty entertaining if you don't get involved with the petty arguments between the so-called experts.
Bad - any episodes involving guns. Examples like Spetnaz, IRA, etc. Boring stuff.
>>560284
Bad- It existed
Good- it was cancelled
>>560284
>Spetnaz
>Boring
American Green Beret detected.
bad-it was stupid
good-it was fun/it triggered the autism of most history fags
How much of the Roman Kingdom is mythology? How much is based on actual events?
Read Herodotus.
>>560218
Some of the the kings most certainly existed, even if they were twisted to fit a literary narrative. Its not even clear all the settlements named were real.
The Romans liked to think of their culture as continuous rather than something that developed over time, so they wrote elements into the past that probably were no there
>>560218
Twin brother thing is present in half of all Indo-European mythologies so I'd take that with a grain of salt.
Is there any merit to the philosophy of progressivism? Could it be true that human society has a certain linear path which it will always advance upon? Or is it just enlightenment bullshit?
>>560126
Define "human society"
Define "certain linear path"
Define "always advance"
Human societies tend to adapt to different circumstances.
The circumstances that humans exist under today are changing at a lightning pace.
There isn't an obvious, linear evolution, but simple logic dictates that our society must be able to adapt.
Mostly just Enlightenment bullshit. It's the easy to make mistake wherein a person sees not the fundamental character of thing but only it's ornamentation. Progressivism sees the technological advancements and what not which are, fundamentally, ornaments which can improve and relax what is at the heart of humanity but does not define it. At the heart is a sort of amorphous, highly capable thing which is unending in its complexity, the greatness of it being in evil and goodness. Which is all say, there's nothing new under the sun honestly, just different forms.
Was he the hero that Europe needed, but not the one it deserved?
>>560124
No. He was an asshole.
>>560124
The laurel and the fleur-de-lis I get, but what's up with the bee?
>>560142
The working class to bee themselves.
why italy suck so much at war
>>559936
Lombard heritage. Next question.
>>559938
why they are brown ?
>>559945
They're part eggplant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM
If you could assemble a small group of people from all of history to bring together a sort of real-life avengers team to represent and fight for humanity, who would you choose?
Marx
Engels
Lenin
Trotsky
I hate humanity, btw.
Macia Nguema
Idi Amin
Cao Cao
Pol Pot
Vladimir Lenin
Saddam Hussein
Muammar Ghaddafi
Marshall Tito
Bernie Sanders
Non-descript female
Dog
>>559683
Alexander the Great
Hannibal
Julius Caesar
Subutai
Timur
Napoleon
Võ Nguyên Giáp
Admiral Yi
Rommel
Nader Shah
Bismarck and Tito as statesmen
Is the universe and all its subjects subject to mathematically perfect darwinism?
Not really. Darwinism can't be applied to the universe in the same way that it's applied to organisms. Apples to apples m8.
WTF am I reading?
>>559723
A pseudo-intellectual stoner
Stalin did nothing wrong.
I fucked your mom
>>559630
>purged his officer corps out of paranoia, thus castrating his army's ability to effectively wage war
>>559630
He was a fucking mass-murderer you illiterate bastard. I don't give a shit what you say, attacking Finland can NEVER be justified. He was a monster, and if I had lived in that time and known this, I would have certainly made an attempt on his wretched life.
All 4 of my grandparents were from Sicily, Italy. Historically, my ancestors would be considered what race?
>>559578
Thats an /int/ernational question.
All 4 of my grandparents were from Chicago, Illinois. Historically, my ancestors would be considered what race?
Normans
Has there ever been something you heard about history that you always laughed off at bullshit, only to be shocked when you find out it was actually true?
This movie for example with the evil british basically being nazis to the colonist. I always thought it was just made up shit to make the bad guy more evil for the sake of the story, but it wasnt that uncommon.
The movie is set in South Carolina, and in the southern states, the british beat back the colonial army, and then put the Loyalist in charge and then really did horrible thing. Shit like decapitate people they believed to be patriots, killing and butchering pregnant women if they found out the father was a rebel.
I even heard that they had whipped the mother of a rebel and when the guy found out, he basically crucified the guy in revenge. The southern theater of the American Revolution was fucking brutal. But to be fair, even the British were disgusted with what the loyalist did .
It's something in the water desu
>WEZ NOT SLAVES
I facepalm every time I see that part of the movie.
This is probably the worst, least historically accurate movies to ever try to pass itself off.
Yes, British rule could be cruel. Both sides officially frowned on acts of brutality. But there were incidents anyway, on both sides, though probably not nearly as prevalent as in other wars of that era.
Ceasar is the single most competent individual to have ever appeared in recorded (and almost certainly unrecorded history as well) history, and even if he was born as part of capite censi he'd probably still have ended up dictator or at least consul. Discuss.
What made him such a genius above geniuses, was it genetics? Nurture? Radioactive spiders?
Pic unrelated, just some idiot
Pompey was better
>>559417
Pic related is the real reason the roman republic fell and became yet another shitty empire, albeit a large one.
They should change the beginning of the common era to when Augustus became emperor t.bh
>>559399
This desu. Even if you call it the common era it's still based on christianity
>>559399
>They should change the beginning of the common era to when Augustus became emperor t.bh
Congrats, an even less globally irrelevant factor .
Keep the fucking BC/AD. I'm an Atheist and it keeps shit tidy. Change it when we start settling in Space in Earnest Tbh.
>>559455
>beginning of Roman empire
>irrelevant
Gtfo retard
What role did people on the autistic spectrum, both low & high functioning, have in general history?
If you could pick one low functioning and one high functioning example of historical autists, who would they be?
As justification for exorcists to exorcise demons out of "possessed" children
read Madness and Civilization
>>559380
I DO NOT THINK THAT GENERALLY, LOW FUNCTIONING AUTISTIC PERSONS HAVE HAD HISTORICAL RELEVANCE, OR A REMARKABLE INFLUENCE UPON HISTORICAL EVENTS, SINCE LOW FUNCTIONING AUTISM IS, UNLIKE HIGH FUNCTIONING AUTISM, MENTAL IMPAIRMENT, BUT IT IS CERTAIN THAT HIGH FUNCTIONING AUTISTIC PERSONS HAVE PLAYED A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CIVILIZATION, AND HAVE GENERALLY HAD GREAT HISTORICAL RELEVANCE.
SOME RENOWN PERSONS THROUGHOUT HISTORY THAT ARE SUSPECTED, OR CONFIRMED, TO HAVE BEEN/TO BE HIGHLY FUNCTIONING AUTISTIC:
— AKHNATON.
— ADOLF HITLER.
— STEVE JOBS.
— NIKOLA TESLA.
— AYN RAND.
— LENI RIEFENSTAHL.
— SAVITRI DEVI.
— RUDOLF HESS.
— LEWIS CARROLL.
— EMILY DICKINSON.
— HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN.
— STANLEY KUBRICK.
— JAMES JOYCE.
— ANGELA MERKEL.
— VLADIMIR PUTIN.
— SIDDHARTHA GAUTAMA.
Did Lincoln free the slaves out of a sense of moral obligation or was it merely a political move?
>>559374
Both.
>>559374
Politics imo
>>559379
Agreed
Greetings from /sci/,
I would like to ask what's the point of History if nobody learns from past mistakes.
>Hitler's attack in Russia
> Despite Napoleon doing the same shit and fucking over again
>>559271
Well, Hitler was not the genious mastermind that some people seems to think.
>>559271
Hitler, while a great orator and figurehead, was no strategos.
Contrary to as some portray, Hitler made a number of major strategic blunders throughout the 2nd WW.
Also, history, despite being the greatest repository of ideas, never truly gives exact formulas as to how one should act. Just showing what exact way didn't work.
>>559271
The Nazis came damn close to winning in the USSR in '41 and '42. If Hitler hadn't insisted on telling his generals what to do they might well have won.