Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3977. page

What we call "Jews" are actually Khazars who migrated to Eastern Europe.
The true descendents of the Israelites reside in North Africa.

former idf soldier here, ama

>>670321

The Jews who are descended from the Khazars are also all descended from the people who once lived in what is now Israel.

The ones you speak of in North Africa follow the religion of the people of Judea before the diaspora, while most modern Jews follow the Rabbinical tradition, which started a few hundred years after the diaspora, so it's a little younger than Christianity.

>>670247
I'll let another country post first but for anyone interested in Irish mythology I'll just let you know

Fiannaíocht>all other cycles

>>670247
>America

>John Henry
Black guy is really good at swinging a hammer. He does it so much that he dies from overexertion.

>Johnny Appleseed
There's a guy who plants apple trees all over the fucking place. He literally cannot stop planting apple trees.

>Paul Bunyan
Guy in Minnesota is really tall and has a pet blue cow. Eats a lot of pancakes.

File: saddam hussein aesthetic.jpg (37KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 590x350px

>>670247
>USA
>Zimmerman Letter
>D-Day was the deciding factor of WW2
>Iraq War was justified
>Gadaffi was a dictator

>>670009
Your abilities individually will count for more than that degree.

McDonalds

Court Jester

I saw a trailer for that new movie Risen a day or two ago. I was actually kind of interested at first, because it seemed like a novel idea.

Then I watched the trailer where Joseph Fienne's main character Tribune guy does a voiceover;

>I have served the Roman Empire
>I have fought wars against those that did not believe in our gods

Dropped.

>>669848
Wait, he called it the roman empire at 33 CE? I'd dropped the movie aswell.

Literally any WW2 documentary
>"the Polish airforce was effectively eliminated in the first day of the war"
>tfw the Poles had aces flying during the second and third weeks of the war
>"by the time England and France declared war on September 3rd, it was already too late for Poland"
>no mentions about heroic Polish last stands like Wizna, Hel Peninsula, and Danzig

>Never mention Lithuania or the Baltic Campaign
>Never mention Polish/Lithuanian/Latvian/Estonia/Yugo Partisans, swear that the French partisans actually did anything on the scale of aforementioned movements

Dont even get me started on the French Campaign in 1940
>"durr france had no tanks lol blitzkrieg"

A vision in the sky

I always like to imagine how fucking surprised the soldiers who nailed Jesus to the cross would be to see the entire Roman Empire worshipping this dude 400 years later.

It was gaining popularity fast, their persecution gained even more sympathizers, and Constantine was a cuck.

File: 2.jpg (167KB, 420x545px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 420x545px

>>669362

2. The Law, why is it no longer in affect? Well (and even Orthodox Judaism agrees here) Jewish Law is NOT for the whole world to follow, it is a specific covenant with the Jewish people, it is like Nazarite or monastic vows. The Jews are a priestly people meant to lead the gentiles to salvation (Isaiah 49:6). All that, Orthodox Judaism concurs with, the only difference is they think that will come with the end times, but gentiles are never seen as required to follow Jewish Law, just the Noahide Law (Orthodox Christian cannot eat blood, either, just as the Noahide Law says). Christians think it came with Christ, and the new covenant was established then, which means the Jews fulfilled their function as leading the Gentiles to salvation, they were now supposed to be a role model for them within the new global covenant. So the idea that the Jewish law is superseded by a brand new global covenant makes sense here, or at least it's not out of the question.


cont

>>669364
Now, let see which Christian narrative we talking about: the primary ones are the pagan Christian narrative (Gnostic), the Pharisaic Christian narrative (Gospel of the Hebrews), and the Essenic Christian narrative (Orthodox). So of course we'll be discussing the last narrative. First thing first, the Essenic Jews considered telling the truth to be a matter of extreme importance, morally, they saw it as better to die than to lie (contrast this with someone like Odysseus). In evidence of this, let's look as Josephus first off, who says they forbade oaths, believing that it was indicting yourself if your regular yes or no were no considered trustworthy, but that if you did need to take an oath, that was it, nothing whatsoever could come between you and that oath; an example is when you were initiated into the Essenes, you had to eat only with them; and if you did something grievous, people would get kicked out, but according to Josephus, they'd often have to live on grass because they said they'd only eat with other Essenes (this of course would eventually kill them, but they were frequently taken back in after many days of privation). This scrupulousness in regard to the truth as highly important, from a moral perspective, was maintained in early Essenic Christianity. In support of this, you only have to see how denying Christ, even on pain of death, was considered absolutely wrong--no other religion is that strict, as far as I know, where you cannot pretend and say you are not be a part of it if threatened with death. Another support for the immense concern for truth is that Christians had to actively confess their sins to each other--in fact, early Christian account record that confession had to be to the whole congregation.
cont

ITT: I've never heard of the problem of induction

>>669360
GAME OVER

>>669360
>Greek Romans
>spend centuries selling Coptic christians to muslims as slaves for shekels and to put off the invasion
>treat Latins as shit, start rolling around some proto-Chick tracts around criticizing their practices
>Dont want to engage Latin theology, consider it "mistaken" even though they havent read it
>imprision their fellow monks that have read it, and naturally, push for reunion after they realized they were on the wrong side of the schism
>reject Rome's attempts to establish reunion, knowing well their modern counterparts will cry that it wasnt "motivated by Christ" because some angry monk said so, and that it was a "forced reunion" even though they could (and did) leave at any minute
>somehow they turn out to be the good guys
hooray for orthodoxy...

>deciding to be heroic at the very last minute

They could've tried being heroic when they still had the resources to win.

File: just dont it.jpg (7KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 480x270px

>>669138

>>669138
Would it be right to kill someone so you can donate their organs and save 5 lives?

Flag the trolley down.
Electric traction allows for quick acceleration/deceleration.
If you've ever watched old footage taken from a streetcar, you'll notice that people and cars get right out in front of them constantly, because they can more-or-less stop on a dime.

>>669073
>used as a weapon
What does that even mean?

>>669073
Given that it was a war, and that's what conquering armies tend to do then yes it's most likely true.

>>669073
Probably not since Knights followed the Chivalric code.

They saw it as natural selection.

Noone gave a shit. Noone gives a shit.

>thread about the brutality of the IRA gets lots of reply with information about irish barbarianism
>suddenly some butthurt paddy makes a thread about "oi me four trillion poor starvingh oirish"
Guess next thread will be a Cromwell one you fucking potato eater

File: smugdane9.jpg (71KB, 403x403px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 403x403px

>>668915
Nice Saxon falseflag.

>>668915

>muh warrior heritage

kek

go back to slurping on that BBC, little Danish boi

The single most obvious bait I've even seen

DELET THIS

> Byzantines were failures.
Their empire existed thousand years after Rome was kill.

>>668836
and it also got rekt thousand times more

>Is Varg right?

I don't think so.

>I thought the theory was universally accepted.

Things in science never really are. I think that it has the most evidence pointed towards it, but I don't think I'd put much weight in it.

>What does /his/ think about Varg?

He's a sociopath and murderer, ruined one of the greatest Black Metal bands in history, and has resorted to racial theories to try and feel superior now that he's amounted to nothing in his life.

>>668678
I think Varg is pretty based. I am not too sure about the 'out of Africa' theory considering they have recently found a human ancestor which predated the oldest found 'human' in Africa.

File: 1387223260579.jpg (46KB, 435x397px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 435x397px

>>668678
are you actually for real?
Varg is completly retarded and his theories are based /pol/ tier science.

He makes good music and is really interesting tho.

File: Avg CK Poster.png (121KB, 764x696px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 764x696px

>>668663
Yes and it was vastly superior to anything Christianity ever accomplished. Haven't you ever heard of the DARK ages???

t. Liberal cuckold

Yeah.

Nah.

What are you gonna do, stab me?

>Raise high the black flags, my children. No prisoners. No pity. I will shoot any man I see with pity in him.

File: 5.jpg (14KB, 222x311px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 222x311px

>There are periods in history when change is necessary, and other periods when it is better to keep everything for the time as it is. The art of life is to be in the rhythm of your age.