>Glorious nippon steel can cut through anything.
>>1037393
That gif is fake. Here, have the real one.
>>1037393
If you go around smashing /any/ swords against something firmly mounted, you'll end up with a broken sword.
Slashing using a part of your edge that is intended for slicing certainly won't help matters.
Turkic? Mongolic? Uralic?
We know so little about the Huns.
>>1037389
Ugly
>>1037422
Proofs?
Seriously now, anything we have that could enlighten us on their origins?
So what are some good materials to read up on the French Revolution (of 1789)? I want to know everything from their wars, to the governments, to the common people's society and the ideas brought forward by each faction.
>>1037363
Bump for interest
>>1037363
>Viva la Revolution
wew
Also the royalists did NOTHING wrong and Rosbespierre was a cunt.
ITT: everyone read the wikipedia article and doesn't know any books
Were the Knights Templar innocent?
>>1037330
Yes.
>>1037334
then who is the baphomet that is consistently referenced in writings by crusaders
>>1037330
No.
Lets play a game /his/
1. Pick a historic figure
2. Give him three pieces of advice
3. Fix history
>Lay-off the Heretics
>Fuck Germany
>Don't stop cumming in Mary, never stop cumming in Mary, any free minute you have should be spent cumming in Mary. Repeat after me "Cum. In. Mary."
A Hapsburg block around France will keep them in check.
>>1037301
Napoleon.
>dont invade russia
>invade britain
>dont invade russia
>post guards by your tent
>don't alienate Máel Sechnaill
>seriously post guards by your tent
>>1037301
>Don't invade Poland
>Make better relations with anti-USSR Britain
>Don't invade Poland
I. Jesus
II. Marcus Aurelius
III. Diocletian?
IV. Constantine
V. Attila
VI. Beowulf?
VII. Muhammad
VIII. Charlemagne
IX. ?
X. ?
XI. Leif Erikson
XII. ?
XIII. Genghis Khan
XIV. ?
XV. Christopher Columbus
XVI. Shakespeare
XVII. Isaac Newton
XVIII. George Washington
XIX. Napoleon
XX. Adolf Hitler
>>1037244
>muhammad
>recognizable
haram
>>1037244
Only us Canadians know about Leif Eriksson
>>1037244
>XVI
>Not Luther
IX might be Alfred the Great, though I'm not sure. That's a bit too western.
VI. Is either Theoderic, Justinian, or Boethius
X. Will be Otto the Great
XI. Is William the Conqueror you dumb idiot
XII. Would probably be Henry II or Barbarossa
XIV. I'd give it to Chaucer for later influence or maybe Edward III
XVII. Is easily Louis XIV
XVIII. George Washington? That's only like the last bit. I'm not sure who to answer myself, maybe another French King, but I don't know.
Historic keks thread.
What moments or events in history make you laugh the most?
a few weeks
>>1037238
The thousand flowers campaign in China
>yeah it's cool intellectuals you can critiscise the CCP
>jks lol now we know who doesn't like us we can just purge you all enjoy self denunciation
why isnt the book of apocrypha in the bible?
I am sorry OP, but this is something that's so really easy to google, why can't you just do that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_apocrypha
>>1037083
Because its apocrypha.
That's like asking why the color Red isn't Blue?
>>1037090
Because the matter that the light is reflected at attracts all wave-lengths that isn't red.
It's a rather complicated question, really.
Best US presidents
I like Ike
Overrated but still good:
Kennedy
Reagan
Lincoln
FDR
>>1037097
>Still good
>Reagan
Well this thread didn't last long.
Did he exist? Is he myth? Is he the Christ? So far in my studies im leaning towards he didn't exist at all. If he did exist his original vision has been warped by church teaching. In Matthew he tells us he did not come to abolish the old law, the church would have you believe otherwise.
He says he came to fulfill the Law, not to abolish it, and he did. The Resurrection is the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets.
Incidentally this makes Judaism something of a religious dead end. Sort of an obsolete faith.
>>1036951
>17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19 Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
He was probably a real man who was mixed in with a lot of myth to form the symbol needed for earlier Christianity to the extent it really doesn't matter if he was real or not.
I have no doubt if Jesus was a real human being he wouldn't approve of at least half of the shit that's directly attributed to his teachings.
>How much did the weather REALLY fuck them at Stalingrad?
The winter wasnt as bad as the winter of 41-42.
It was less the weather than the million Red Army soldiers surrounding them that fucked up Paulus's 6th Army.
>>1036883
Very little. Hell, according to Chuikov, the one time he thought they were really in danger in the city was when you had a partial freeze of the Volga, when the ice was too thin to send sleds across, but it still interrupted barge traffic, and thus made it hard to resupply.
Wasn't really the weather, just the fact troops weren't prepared if I recall
Also, fuck the italians
The Emperor is the rightful leader of these lands.
The Shogun must be overthrown.
Triples over ride singles.
Under the authority of these digits I order your execution under the 3rd article of the code of the warrior.
the only based emperor there ever was tbqh
sucessfully uncucked the imperial throne and made Japan great again
>>1036898
The Meiji Emperor was just a figurhead utilized by anti-Tokugawa warlords.
The last uncucked Emperor was really Go-Daigo back in the Kemmu Restoration of the 1300's.
Uhhh it says here your studies specialize in the; I'm sorry I hope I don't mispronounce this *clears throat* "Holy Roman Empire"... Care to explain?
AAAAAAA STOP IT
It seems there has been a misunderstanding, since in actuality, I studied the Roman Empire in its medieval phase when its capital was based in Constantinople, and certainly not the "Holy Roman Empire".
Out of all the dumb Crash Course-tier "jokes" circulating around /his/, this one's the worst.
Do you think the lone viking from the Stamford Bridge battle was real? Both Norse and Saxon sources talk about him but that '' climbed into a big barrel and floated under the bridge with a long spear and stabbed the viking up through the wooden slats'' part seems weird. Is it even possible to fucking float in a barrel? Where did he get that barrel from? Also ''shrugging off arrows'' is suspicious to say the least.
>>1036573
Why that? It's certainly within the realm of possibility and I know of at least a few occasions where folks shot with arrows just ripped them out and continued fighting.
Sort of related
>At the Battle of Garigliano he single-handedly defended the bridge of the Garigliano against 200 Spaniards, an exploit that brought him such renown that Pope Julius II tried unsuccessfully to entice him into his service.
>Shrugging off arrows
I call bullshit. It would be easier to shrug off getting stabbed than getting shot with an arrow.
>>1036596
Remember how Henry V was shot in the fucking face with a longbow and was more or less okay or how the Swiss ripped crossbow bolts from their body to continue fighting?
Can someone teach me a little bit about Roman placenames?
Mainly, what determined for the Romans calling something -ia vs. -ium? Obviously the words themselves are two different genders, but why is it Italia and Britannia and not Italium and Britannium? Why Antium and not Antia?
Anything else you can tell me about Roman toponymy?
I'm pretty sure -ia is the plural and -ium is the singular.
Regions/countries seem to predominantly have -ia attached to the end while cities seem to be a mixture of -ia and -ium.
>>1036534
somebody asked pretty much exactly this question in my Latin class a while ago, and I think the professor basically said that there was no rhyme or reason to which ending the name used. I think a lot of the names came from whatever the locals called the place anyways, or in some cases the Romans either used the Greek name or just pulled something out of their asses
>>1036537
you're thinking of the neuter gender, which I don't think was used in any placenames, but I honestly have no clue what the justification for it was.