/d/ Meta Thread

>>7513976
I think futa is only a problem when they start having duplicate threads, like any other fetish on /d/. We only need one Futa on Male thread, but a Futa on Male thread and Futa on Female thread seem fine to me.

Still sort of salty about them banning literally two of the threads I lurk the most. Whilst I do understand that captions are low-tier shit, there's not enough comics of my fetishes so I have to make due with written garbage, and in general pictures with no text whatsoever rarely fucking do it for me. I need a story/scenario, not just an image, and yeah, I can create one in my mind but I'm just a lazy fuck trying to jerk one out.

More on topic with the futa threads - futa is a staple of /d/. I hate it 'em but it wouldn't be /d/ without 'em.

>>7513995
/d/ is for dickgirls after all

>>7513976
pretty sure we could start grouping threads together into "genres" like fat yeah, and if people want specific gender pairings they dont need a separate thread for that

I don't think fat male or inflation should be allowed at all considering 90% of the thread content is western pictures

>>7514018
Isn't that just a case of not posting western art and reporting it when people do?

If a thread is full of western art, it'll get deleted regardless.

If you don't like caption or CYOA threads, there is a simple solution, don't click on them.

With filters, you can even hide them away.

>>7514024
Hard to click on something that doesn't exist.

>>7513995
I think the question isn't "do we need futa threads", more "do we need THIS MANY futa threads". Personally I've never seen a problem with the number of futa threads, there's only so many possible ways to depict futas after all.

I miss captions and cyoa its how that I found /d/ in the first place.

>>7513976
>Should every thread have duplicates for each combination of male/female/futa?
Have to, it's the only way to reach 150 threads nowdays.

>>7514056
Well there are theoretically unlimited things we could fetishize, we just need to find the content for it. Surely there's more than the 50 or so recurring fetishes we see.

Whatever happened to dicknipples, for example?

>>7513995
Amen, anon.

Have they moved anywhere? I know the last couple times the mods have kicked out a thread I loved they've ended up on other boards.

>>7513976
The duplicate threads don't bother me. They mostly self curate. If they get too spread out, they'll reconsolidate. If a thread gets too big it splits, like preg

>>7514023
If the mods did their jobs, sure, but they don't. Even though I disagree with that rule, it is an actual admin-made rule, so I can still shit on the mods for not even following actual rules.

>>7514067
>>Whatever happened to dicknipples, for example?
Banned.

>>7514118
Pretty sure dicknipples aren't banned anon.

>>7514122
They're banned like captions are banned - No rule against them but their threads are deleted anyway. Probably because it lead to shitting dicknipples and scat is banned. And, because the Mods are lazy, they ban the origin rather than deleting only the offending images.

>Captions are words on a picture
>Captions are banned
>Doujins are words on a picture
>Doujins aren't banned

Really gets my thinker throbbin'

>>7514136
One's writing is "low quality"
But please, don't start this again, I don't want to deal with shitposter-kun anymore than I have to

>>7514136
>>7514138
One is writing included by the original artist, and as has been pointed out a ridicilous number of times now, captions involve adding stuff to a picture to force your head canon onto it.

If it's not put there by the original artist, or translated by a translator, then you shouldn't be writing all over a picture before you post it.

>>7514136
>>7514138
>>7514141
thanks a lot guys, you summoned him

>>7514141
If I don't like it no one should like it.

>>7514141
>>7514138
>Doujins can't be low quality
>Original author isn't just adding stuff to pictures and forcing their head canon onto it
Especially since many doujins are based on existing properties, it's just as bad if not even worse.

go make caption threads on /trash/. is that so hard?

>>7514150
>>7514149
If someone posts a low quality doujin, report it.

>>7514152
Because /trash/ is shit. How hard is that to get? Nobody wants to go to that furfag shithole.

>>7514157
All doujins are low quality, since they're words on images.

>>7514159
>>7514158
>>7514157
>>7514152
>>7514150
>>7514149
>>7514147
>>7514141
>>7514138
>>7514136
Ignore these morons. The more you respond the more they think people care.

>>7514161
who are you talking to? who is they?

>>7514056
Every combination would be:
Male on Male
Male on Female
Male on Futa
Futa on Male
Futa on Female
Futa on Futa
Female on Male
Female on Female
Female on Futa

You could then start making the arguments for combinations thereof.

Even still, that means we only get to have maybe 15 fetishes on /d/.

daily reminder that this meta thread is for the discussion of /d/ related issues, and if your fetish got banned from /d/, then it's no longer /d/ related

>>7514166
Don't forget the whole shemale/futa schism

And I still don't know what a newhalf is

>>7514169
>newhalf
a pre-op mtf transsexual, e.g. poison

>>7514174
>inb4 poison doesn't have a dick

>>7514169
>>7514174
>>7514175
oh boy here we go.zip.exe

>>7514174
and the difference between that and a shemale?

>>7514180
none

>>7514181
>inb4 whats the difference between shemale and futa

>>7514168
Shitmodding is a /d/ issue, though.

>>7514190
hide this post and move on

>>7514166
>>7514169
>>7514174
>>7514175
>>7514177
>>7514180
>>7514181
>>7514182
That increases it to 16 possible combos per fetish. So like 10 fetishes total.

So should we be posting individual fetish threads and ignoring gender for purposes of topics?

>>7514205
Of course not, the mods haven't finished culling fetishes yet. We'll be down to 5 total before thye're done.

I think /d/ collectively as a whole should just band together and defy the mod crackdown on the shit they want gone.

the only people who wanted those threads gone were a whiny bitch-ass minority, and just like when they whined to get /aco/ they got the mods to cave and ban shit they don't personally like.

I say fuck them, and fuck the mods, who for years now have been fucking up this board. Up until kind of recently /d/ has been in a rut of of shit content, being little more than a futa image dump board, but then the caption threads, CYOA, shit like that, all came about and suddenly we had more to discuss, more OC to create, and it broke up the monotony. And that just got taken away for totally bullshit reasons because the mods think they know better. And they don't. How can they have the sheer fucking gall to claim they know better when they spend all day circlejerking in IRC? The state of the site should tell you well enough that mods don't spend enough time doing much of anything let alone being immersed or knowledgable about any given board except a handful of pet boards. So how can they even think to be the authority on what's best for any given board?

So honestly, we should just resist and defy until they fuck off with that shit. It's worked in the past on other boards where mods overstepped their bounds or shat on the userbase. I'm sick of this shit, and I'm sure other long time users are sick of it too. We need to send a cleat message to the mods that we're done being picked on by what seems to be one mod with a serious hateboner for this board. This retarded meddling has been going on for what feels like years now and this is probably the most hostile action towards /d/ yet by the mod(s). Enough is enough.

captions were the reason i started going to /d/ like 10 years ago

what the fuck mods?

>>7514211
>>7514224
>>7514249
cucks go home
>>>/trash/

>>7514224
I think the meta threads are helping with the defying what else should be done?
I know some of us email Hiro moot, some went on the IRC channel to have a say and some spammed.
We could do this for the long haul until they give in, but do you have any other ideas that can be done to get the mod to fuck off?

>>7514182
whats the term for an FtM?

>>7514255
Anon, no one wants to go there.

>>7514224
>>7514260
>band together
>defy the mods
This isn't World of Warcraft, and until you stop using this stupid language, no one is going to listen to what you have to say.

>>7514264
you dont have to go home but you cant stay here.flac

>>7514266
shoo shoo shitposter-kun

>>7514255
>>7514266
>>7514270
Just ignore them, they're looking for people to reply to them so they can think people care. The more attention you give them the more you feed into their delusion that they're in the middle of some kind of titanic political struggle.

Tthe mods have been really on point in deleting single-post begging threads the last week or so. They're usually being deleted within an hour whereas they used to take a day or more to be deleted.

>>7514270
Who are you to say this isn't home?

So I think most of /d/ would agree that BBW and SSBBW can be broadly put into the same thread, but would people agree to put Weight Gain and Inflation in there too?

>>7514224
>/d/ collectively as a whole
Not going to happen.
People are lazy they won't act until it happens to them.
People are arrogant they believe it won't happen to them and would side with the mod until it does.
The only people who are going to defy the mod are the people who actively visit those threads and people who in general hate mods.

Just ignore the shitposters until their moms call them down the carpeted stairs for tater tots.

>>7514287
this

>>7514280
Weight gain maybe, but Inflation is pretty different to BBW.

It's kind of like the difference between fake and natural tits. BBW is saggy, Inflation is perky and full. Most people who are really into one are probably not into the other, despite the outward similarities.

>>7514287
>inb4 STOP IGNORING US THIS IS SUPER IMPORTANT ASDFGSF

>>7514287
I kind of like saying, shoo shoo shitposter-kun, but you're right ignoring them will make them go away.
We should add that to the next meta thread as a reminder.

>>7514260
Defiantly start posting caption threads and whatever else is being 'disallowed', while pretending the mods don't exist whenever they delete/permasage them

People like the mods who get off on being authority can't stand being ignored, so pretending nothing is happening when they try and fail to keep caption/censor/OC threads removed will drive them nuts. We either force them to give up trying to get rid of them because it's not worth the effort to fight us, or we force them to escalate to the point where they make a huge fucking scene and then either get demodded/barred from modding this board because they seriously overstepped their bounds/sperged out.

There isn't going to be a peaceful resolution, sadly. the mods seem to think they know better than the users so they aren't going to budge. The only way to show them we aren't gonna stand for being bullied like this is to be assertive.

>>7514266
This is how 4chan has always dealt with shitmodding problems.

>>7514281
You're probably right, sadly.

>>7514293
The people wanting unbanned are the shitposters, anon. You got that, right? I'd hate to give you the wrong impression.

>>7514296
>I once read a cracked.com article about 4chan
>4chan is super radical and they start fights all the time
>this is how to get things done on 4chan
>this is how 4chan has always done things thats what some dude said
>even though I only got here last week

>>7514297
Obviously.

>>7514290
Is it really so inimical that the Bbw anons and Inflation anons couldn't stand to have their images in the same thread?

>>7514290
Glad we actually get to talk about stuff that matters.

BBW/SSBBW/Weight gain could be one thread, and Inflation another. I don't imagine they would mesh well.

>>7514299
>*BRAAAAAAAAPFFFFFFT*
Uh, thanks for sharing?

>>7514296
>spam caption threads
I'm not looking for a ban anon,
I am hoping one of the emails gets through the hiro moot so that he can come down, see that the mod is a shitter and bans him.

http://www.strawpoll.me/13312980 never 4getti moms spaghetti

>>7514309
Hiro: Why are these people upset.
Mod: We deleted 3 threads.
Hiro: Why did you delete them.
Mod: You told us to enforce the rules.
Hiro: Okay get back to work.

>>7514138
>All doujins are high quality writing
>Most doujins are high quality writing
>Something greater than "a rare few" doujins are quality writing
Pick your lie

>>7514310
>using strawpolls
I've already voted three times strawpolls are shit.

>>7514304
Anyone super into inflation who can give their two cents on the matter?

>>7514309
Well, you can try but I don't think anything will come of it. He hasn't stepped in to deal with the many, many other cases of big scale mod faggotry even when people flood his inbox and twitter about it.

>>7514312
Or you know, people who didn't like them could have HIDDEN and IGNORED the threads they don't like instead of bitching to the mods until they caved to get people to shut up so they could go back to sucking each other off in IRC

>>7514315
It was started by the Unban Us Group for Uncucking (UGUU).

>>7514318
Anon, ignore the shitposter.

>>7514319
>>7514318
>>7514315
>>7514314
>>7514312
>>7514310
>>7514309
>>7514306
Ignore these posts. Discuss /d/ related topics.

>>7514318
>capitalizing random words
hey this guy is back

>>7514321
Shitmodding is /d/ related, as it directly affects the state of the board.

get fucked apologist

>>7514320
Why reply to a shitposter to tell them to ignore shitposters?

>>7514328
ignore this post

>>7514328
Hide this post and move on.

>>7514280
Every weight thread is full of the most disgusting images i've ever seen. Ban this low-quality shit.

>>7514287
Can't ignore the mod, my man.

>>7514332
Thanks for your valuable opinion anon, I'll file that under "S" for "Super Opinion".

>>7514280
Are Chubby, BBW and SSBBW really that similar? They describe drastically different body types.

>>7514330
>>7514331
>S-SHUT UP-P!
No

>>7514334
Prove me wrong.

>>7514336
And here you have the reason why we ignore these cucks.

>>7514332
Bait.

>>7514337
I'm not here to prove anyone wrong anon, because what would that do? It wouldn't change anything. You might be here to start internet fights but I'm not. Good luck finding someone who cares.

>>7514280
Inflationfag here, inflation's barely related to WG/bbw at all. If anything, it'd fit better in the various expansion threads, but I don't know how well the breast/ass expansion would take it.

Doesn't seem inconcievable that a generic "fat" thread could work. The threads aren't so busy that people would get confused are they?

>>7514343
So you think a "fat" thread and "expansion" thread would work better?

>>7514341
>You might be here to start internet fights
I'm not a mod, so no.

File: exclamation-mark-98739_960_720.png (29KB, 817x720px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 817x720px

As much fun as it is to poke fun at the folks who got banned, especially as they're so easy to upset, it's just making these threads unbearable, and encouraging them to spam elsewhere. For everyone's sake, just ignore them. The rest of the board shouldn't have to suffer because they got banned.

>>7514343
Well we should probably rope in some folks from the expansion thread too then.

I don't quite understand why captions were banned, because it kind of opens up a lot of questions with the terminology of "low quality".

A lot of muscle threads have fucking awful, low quality art that's more muscle than it is even recognizably human. Some people get off to that. That's not my problem, I just scroll past those images when I feel like fapping to muscle, and find something with better anatomy.

As somebody who liked the censor thread and was about to start contributing my own work to the threads, the disbanding to /trash/ mostly just turned people away from the threads, so now they're dead. And it just gets more confusing when people will post captioned images in other topics without ban.

As to the other topics in OP, what's even the problem with the current moderation? Why are we even considering combining threads? Pruning topics? Was there anybody even complaining about this shit before the censor/caption thread bans started?

Sure, maybe there's a bit too much futa threads, but futa's like, the most vanilla /d/ shit you can muster, of course there's going to be far too much.

>>7514043
Agreed, it's the whole reason I come, in more ways than one.

>>7514353
>>>/trash/

>>7514358
now that's a low quality post if i've ever seen one :^)

>>7514349
The board users shouldn't have to deal with seeing Fat threads and Smell threads in the catalog while searching for other things.

>>7514224
I agree with you. We ought to keep posting CYOA threads and keep getting banned. If they get us all, well, they'll have no one posting on their site. There's no other way to clearly show our dissaproval.

>>7514363
wow are you kidding? kinkshaming on /d/?

>>7514365
>if they get us all they'll have no one posting on their site
>if it wasn't for us there wouldn't be a single person on this website
>we are literally everyone

>>7514366
>>7514367
just ignore them, they're fishing for replies because it makes them feel relevant

>>7514366
Every fat thread OP image is some gross fucking baloon with 20 folds on each side, and every time I see a fart image or a armpit image it's just a picture of someone's ass with some photoshopped green color over it.

>>7514369
Speaking of fishing for replies, here's a (You).

>>7514370

>>7514384
Mod is scared of words. It also explains why he can't read the rules.

why's it such a big fuckin deal how many futa threads there are? Just don't go to them. People obviously like them or else there wouldn't be so many. If it wasn't popular, it'd get sent to the shadow realm due to inactivity.

I come here and pick a single thread that applies to my interests, jack my wiener, then leave. Now the stuff I wanted to see isn't here anymore because it's suddenly a goddamn political scuffle over what you can and can't post. It's just porn people.

I'm not even into futa but jesus man. Does there have to be a goddamn whitelist of the dozen or so acceptable topics on this board? This is the kinda drama you see between minecraft server admins.

>>7514346
Ideally, yeah.
At the very least, boobs and butt expansion can be grouped together. Full-body and belly-centric should be easy to merge if those few mega-autismo shitposters that derail every other thread are reigned in.

>>7514388
The trouble is that there's not enough futa threads. Too many other fetishes are flooding the board and bumping futa threads off.

>>7514367
Sorry, I left something out of my original post that was more necessary than I though:
[sarcasm]
[/sarcasm]

>>7514388
It's not that big a deal. No one is saying it is. We're just discussing it. Not every discussion is LOLZOMG THE END OF THE WORLD.

If people discussing things upsets you maybe this isn't the place for you?

>>7514393
>Make an entire thread to bitch about it
>OH BUT IT'S NOT IMPORTANT LOL
Pick one.

>>7514392
sure you did, nice save

>>7514388
It's because 4chan is trying to get rid of porn boards to reduce costs. That's why /d/ gets unwanted nazimodding while /u/ and /y/ don't get the modding they constantly request.

>>7514393
>It's not a big deal, just ignore the sticky
>and the thread on front page about it which is currently stuck to front page because of the volume of posts
>and the occasional shitposters who insert themselves into threads to either whine about moderation or "fight whiny shitposting" by replying to shitposters

This is a pretty low quality discussion thread, mate. Telling off the dude who clearly wants to talk about it isn't the way to go about making a discussion thread.

Look I think every reasonable person can agree that on /d/ global rule 6 is a terrible reason to ban anything, because if it's not your fetish it's hard to judge quality. Now if I am being honest the only fetishes that don't belong on this board are /h/ content, loli (pedophilla), scat, guro, and furry. Anyone who has lurked on /d/ would know that, And if you don't here is a history lesson we were all kicked off of /h/ because we were to strange for /h/. Everyone here would have been banned in the early days when there was only /h/. Is /d/ now as cancerous as /h/? I'd like to think we as a whole are redeemable and can respect that it's not my fetish but you deserve to right use this board as much as I do. Now if you disagree then you can get the fuck off this board you are the cancer that is killing /d/.


tldr; mod needs to lurk moar. people need to stop being elitist pricks

>>7514394
What makes you think that because people made a thread about something it's important? You seem to greatly overvalue words on a website.

>>7514398
>low quality discussion thread
Oxymoron, every discussion is low quality. Too many words.

>>7514398
This thread has nothing to do with the bans, it's for /d/ related discussion. Read the OP.

>>7514400
If you didn't care you wouldn't have made a thread. Unless you were trolling, but I can give the benefit of the doubt.

>>7514402
The shitmod is still on /d/, so shitmodding is still /d/ related.

>>7514402
>more than just the bans
People are discussing more than just that, though? They're saying the idea of extrataneous modding is wholly unnecessary and that separation of topics into more generals is equally useless.

>Games threads are literally only discussion and links to other threads with a few non-pon screencaps intersperced
>Games themselves are a form of ERP, since you're playing the role of a character in an erotic situation
>Not banned
What fucking genius is running this dump? Those threads are totally against the rules.

>>7514402
>>7514401
>>7514400
>>7514399
>>7514398
>>7514397
>>7514395
>>7514394
>>7514393
>>7514392
>>7514390
Ignore this shit, discuss /d/.

>>7514407
Good idea anon. Nothing seems to piss them off more than ignoring them.

>>7514407
Post ignored.

File: 006.jpg (364KB, 1280x1840px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1280x1840px

>/d/ - Hentai/Alternative

> "Alternative" images including: futanari, bondage, tentacles, etc. are welcome. Caveats below.
> Images depicting bestiality, guro, scat, or generally seen to be "extreme" in nature are not to be uploaded.
> Western drawn/styled ("toon") pictures and fan drawn ("fanart") images are not allowed.

Here are the rules from 4chan for /d/. I guess we need to change them to include to many words. But who reads the actually fucking terms and conditions anyways.

>>7514407
You can't have a meta thread without people talking about the state of the board or replying to posts, anon.

One of those posts is literally talking about /d/.

>>7514389
So Inflation and Expansion could be combined together, BBW/SSBBW/Weight Gain could be combined together.

Should these then be seperated into genders?

>>7514411
Just take the "etc" out of the first line.
Also I don't think BDSM is even allowed anymore, so take the bondage out too.

>>7514406
Pointing out the mods double standards is only going to get those threads banned, have you not learned anything?

>>7514413
Inflation and Explansion are totally different things. Inflation inflates like a balloon, so the body mutates wildly. Expansion just expans certain parts, but the body generally still retains a human form.

>>7514416
What do you think I'm trying to do? Theyr'e the worst threads on the board.

>>7514413
I can't speak for the WG threads, but people tend to flip their shit whenever (god forbid) a /male/ inflation pic dares to stray into the current inflation thread.

>>7514411
Is this image "low quality", because it's captioned, or should it be allowed because the image was built for the caption and not the other way around?

There's no logic to the banning.

>>7514424
Logic isn't a /d/ topic, please only talk about /d/ topics.

>>7514420
You aren't wrong but some people enjoy those threads.

>>7514425
do you think the board is pronounced "dee" or "slash dee slash"

>>7514425
text isn't /d/ related, stop posting text

>>7514426
So? You can say that about every thread on the board. Doesn't mean they deserve to stay.

>>7514428

>>7514419
And what if you keep expanding in expansion, does it turn into inflation? Where do you draw the line?

>>7514425
/d/ is not a /d/ topic please chat somewhere else /d/ is a porn board

>>7513976
Fuck you for getting efg kicked.

what if we make a font with dicks on it and start a fetish thread for letters with penises, then we could nonchalantly place these penis covered characters over other images

this plan is fool proof

>>7514429
Just ignore them anon, they just want replies before they leave for dubschan.

>>7514429
They haven't done anything wrong, leave /dgg/ alone.

>>7514434
>fuck you for getting us kicked from the game
lol

>>7514431
The line is when the shape turns from humanoid into something more purely spherical.

>>7514438
chatting threads are against mod rules it sucks but what are you going to do?

>>7514438
see
>>7514437

>>7514402
OP can get fucked if he thinks he can decide that the bans are no longer a topic of discussion. It's a meta thread to discuss the board, and the bans are a recent event on said board.

>>7514445
Bitch about the rules

>>7514445
Nothing.

>>7514438
The haven't done anything right, either. And they have done wrong. Not only are their threads are more discussion than images, their images are rarely truly pornographic instead of just being generic game screenshots, maybe with some erotic text. They don't even discuss the porn most often, they talk about the gameplay. They could just as easily be on /vg/ like /hgg/ or /hgg2d/ and such are.

>>7514447
Pretty sure last thread you all were saying we weren't allowed to discuss things other than the bans. How does it feel when someone uses your logic against you?

>>7514445
Lament the fact that the Admin is allowing the Mods to abuse their power because he doesn't give a shit. I miss moot.

Can we get trap threads banned from /d/?
They'd fit better on /y/.

>>7514455
Has anyone even tried contacting him?

>>7514459
Yes, quite a few autistics have emailed the guy who owns the fucking website because they don't like the rules.

>>7514452
>I'm gonna pretend he's another poster so it looks like he's conflicting himself
>that'll show him!


the only thing I posted last thread was asking why a bunch of OP images got deleted in otherwise legal threads.
Nobody answered and I'm still curious too.

>>7514459
Yep. No response. Didn't respond the last couple of times this happened either, and multiple people have asked. He doesn't care about the porn boards, so naturally he won't listen to anything we have to say.

>>7514463
*they don't like that mods can arbitrarily make rules even though they're actually not allowed to

Look at what happened with nipplemod on /a/. Tried to make a rule, it got shot down and he got fired. Only works for them though because he gives a shit about them, unlike us backwater hillbilly porn board yokels.

>>7514463
Are you new or something?
People used to contact moot all the time about 4chan issues.

>>7514463
>discussion with the owner is autistic
hownew.ru

>>7514477
>>7514474
>>7514472
>>7514459
>Expecting a jap to be able to read English competently

Yep, it's autism.

>>7514261
just reverse trap i think?

>>7514479
You can't be serious.

>>7514488
Of course I am. He can probably barely communicate in English like most japs.

File: Handholding+degenerate+shitposting_659416_5857805.jpg (158KB, 850x832px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 850x832px

Can't we all just fap in peace with no kink shaming from the mods?

This is /d/ where dick nipples, monster girls and FUTA are welcome.

Where a hand holding thread are shocking.

And consensual intercourse with the lights off in missionary position for the sole purpose of reproduction needs to get the fuck out

>>7514491
Didn't seem to have a problem in /qa/ that one time

>>7514499
He probably had a translator on hand for it, he's not going to have someone translate all his emails and shit. Probably too busy to even google translate any of it.

can we just reach a consensus, please?

>>7514513
Not until we ban everyone we don't like.

>>7514508
jesus dude, maybe you're incompetent, but it's not too uncommon to be bilingual, shit, I know enough nip to read a doujin, and I'm thick as fuck, not too mention english is probably way easier to learn

>>7514513
If the mods don't like something it's going to get banned. The mods clearly should be able to dictate what content is and isn't allowed regardless of the board rules, it's already improved the board a ton and definitely made the posters happier as evidenced by these meta threads which constantly hit 1000+ posts.

>>7514519
There's knowing enough to get by, and then knowing enough to actually communicate and converse. The first one is likely, the second one is not.

>>7514523
I wish moot never left ;_;

hiroshima nagasaki was probably the worst choice...

>>7514519
You're responding to a mod or mod cocksucker, the mods could take a dump in his mouth and he'd defend their actions.

File: 53613650_p0_master1200.jpg (43KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 450x600px

>>7514522
You say that now until the mods come for your fetish next...

Then where are you going to go its not like there is unlimited porn all over the internet... wait a sec.

Reminder that not only are traps /y/ content, but often they also break the no shota rule.

>>7514536

Uhhh, Anon?

Take another look at the post, because it's quite clearly sarcasm.

>>7514536
I used to come here for the original content and discussion, if I just want images I go to pixiv or artists twitters. It's better than going in to threads which are 90% reposts.

>>7514580
Only the second half is, the first half is solid fact.

>>7514582
>Coming to an imageboard for content and discussion
You have only yourself to blame.

>>7514584
If there was no discussion or original content it would literally be a shittier version of a booru.

>>7514580

I was trying for tongue in cheek, sarcastic humor guess I missed.

If the mods actually thought discussing fetishes is bad these threads wouldn't still be around.
>>7505157
>>7445756
>>7458369
>>7475473

>>7514588
Well, hope you like shitty boorus.

Why not delete this board? It serves no purpose anymore. Originally it was a containment board, but now mods just tell people to go everywhere else. It's a board without a purpose at this point.

>>7514636
>194 posts
>26 posters
I don't think anyone cares anymore, they are just letting the mods do what they want.

>>7514649
No other option, I just find it hilarious how badly they want to delete the board yet they lack the courage to actually do it.

/d/ is a good-ass board and y'all need to quit being so negative, we've got a shitty mod throwing their e-dong around in a futile attempt to fill the gaping void in their soul, but if we continue posting good content that we know is fitting for the board we can push through it.

>>7514654
It'll just happen again in 5 months, just when things are starting to look normal again.

>>7514636

Deleting boards one by one sure is a great way to keep 4chan viable.

It's not like Hiroyuki has complained about struggling to make ends meet or that they had to make the 4chan GOLD account real to keep things above water.

>>7514661
Reduce server costs by reducing the amount of server space used, which is done by removing boards. If they run everyone off, they can just claim it's because of low usage.

>>7514671

The extra costs of adding a board are virtually nil, boards only add real server demands if they have traffic. It's why Hiroyuki has been able to roll out so many trial boards, adding a board costs basically nothing itself.

4chan already struggles to have enough traffic to make ends meet, and according to SW traffic analytics, the adult boards are the most popular and the largest revenue drivers. It would make no business sense to start by nuking them.

>>7514684
Then why are they nuking one?

File: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.png (15KB, 654x662px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 654x662px

>>7514684
>and according to SW traffic analytics, the adult boards are the most popular and the largest revenue drivers
Does this explain /aco/?

>>7514684
>Hey, our adult boards bring in the most revenue! How should we capitalize on this?
>Make it into a more heavily moderated booru, that'll put asses in seats

Hello, I'd like to represent the fetish for thin girls with round bellies and belly stuffing general. In the past I've made a few threads when I found some amount of new content for these fetishes. I would very much like it if we could keep BBW and SSBBW threads separate from belly stuffing and similar threads. I personally just like thin girls with round bellies, it can be frustrating when very fat images overtake. That being said, I am only one man, so it's only an opinion.

>>7514196
Man, look at all those high quality images and /d/-specific fetishes! I'm glad the mods came through and cleaned it up instead of pruning it outright. Hell of a job!

>>7513976
I want to know what the fuck happened to the /d/ Voice threads. I saw that a new thread got started last Sunday, which then got moved to fucking /Trash/, which made absolutely no fucking sense. I've been away from my computer ever since, so I don't know what's happened. Since there isn't a current thread on either board, I'm guessing the new Mod is going batshit crazy with power or something?

>>7514224
>I'm sick of this shit, and I'm sure other long time users are sick of it too.
10+ year /d/eviant here. I could not fucking agree more. /d/ was nearly completely killed when /aco/ was created and barely anyone posted for months. A thread could go DAYS without a post and still not be on page 10. It was horrible. It took a long time, but we were finally getting back into our groove of being creative with our fetishes and trying new things. The Voice thread is a perfect example. It reminds me of when the /d/raw thread was new. Actual OC was being posted. It was fun and exciting. /d/ is my home away from home. It has been since I was a kid. It really bothers me when shit like this happens.

>>7514281
>People are lazy they won't act until it happens to them.
Where have I heard this story before...
>First, they came for the "Insert some fetish you don't like here" threads, and I did not speak out, because I did not like those threads...
>Then, they came for the Caption threads, and I did not speak out, because I did not care for the Caption threads, either...
>Then, they came for the Voice threads, and there was no one left to speak for them...

>>7514366

>unironically using the term "kinkshaming"
You are part of the problem

>>7514781
what's your fetishes so I can make fun of them?

>>7514782
it's women telling me how much they love me

unfortunately only voice threads and caption threads could fulfill this rare fetish

>>7514782

Tile patterns

>>7514778
You found the problem. OC makes this much less booru-like. That's a no-no for the current mod team.

>>7514782

missionary sex with the intent of procreation

>>7514027
amen to that
also /d is for dickgirls right?

>>7513976
Hold on, and just let me boil one thing down as a simple fact before you all get back to this thread:

/d/ today is not moderated by deviants. /d/ today is being moderated by some weird moral fags who browse /y/ and /e/ in their off time. They clearly don't understand our community. They clearly don't understand of over lapping with /tg/. Simply put, it's not that the mods are autistic, it's just that the mods assigned to mod /d/ are the wrong people for the job. /d/ is mostly a self moderating board that just needs general community rules for people to follow and one or two janitors to make sure no asshat is posting cp or other bullshit. Until this is understood, expressed to the global mods, and codified for all future purposes...well just expect more rash decision by board mods that make no sense.

I thought we had a good thing going with the Futa Quest but it was banned from here too and died soon after being moved into /trash/. What a kick in the dick.

>>7514083
Got kicked to /aco/, now to trash.
It's a shame, since I really liked the few /aco/ write threads that have come and gone.

>>7514043
I only liked the caption and voice threads, what happened to the voice threads?

FYI the person running the CYOA Futaquest or whatever it was called also got banned from /d/.

So there is that.

>>7514849
This, completely. There isn't a mod on the team who actively browses this board. At most, they'll do like many others where they'll jump in, fap, then leave. They have this idea that this board can only be an image dump board, and any attempt to expand beyond that is met with extreme prejudice because it doesn't mesh with their vision.

Instead of letting the board become what it could be, they keep it as what it isn't. They actively push negative regulations on no real authority in order to prevent the board from reaching it's actual potential.

The worst thing is that there's nobody actively calling for any of this action to be taken, it's just the mod either power-tripping or outright sabotaging the board. And when people do ask for things, they get ignored at best. I don't even mean on this current situation, I mean when there's things people generally agree should stop happening.

People are generally good enough at following thread-specific rules, so that is rarely a problem. When it is, all it takes is a janitor to remove some dickgirls in a thread requesting no futa, it's not really that tough.

>>7514859
I wish the current mod team would get banned from being alive.

Even if an argument could be made to ban the CYOA and caption threads (not one I necessarily agree with, but a reasoned argument nonetheless), banning the writefag thread is a step too far. It was a good, regular thread producing average to high quality OC on a regular basis.

>>7514889
Words aren't allowed on Boorus, anon.

>>7514864
1000% this.

So now that the mods are determined to kill /d/ because they don't like certain types of threads, where else do you guys go for /d/-tier content?

>>7514168
The fact that a fetish that isn't illegal in some way got banned from /d/ pretty much proves that the mods here have no idea what /d/ is supposed to be and are just trying to turn it into their own personal fetish board. And that is a /d/ related problem.

>>7513997
No, it's not. /d/ was much better before you futafags fucked it up.

>>7513976
Make a containment board for futafags and /d/'s quality will drastically improve. Also kick out and ban sissy shit and /lgbt/ trolls, I'm tired of those fuckers ruining good tg threads with their boner killing cancer.

>>7513976
I've played on fucking Minecraft servers that had better and more professional moderators than this board.

>>7514927
Sad Panda and Pixiv. Use a handful of other places but the quality is way too scattershot.

>>7514260
Does anyone actually USE the IRC? Dead silent any time I visit it and I never see any mods.

>>7514935
Sorry to say this, but this IS the futa containment board.

If threads that foster discussions aren't allowed, why are there TWO Globalized fetish threads? Most of the posts are just explanations of how they envision things going, with some of them occasionally posting an image. It's pretty much JUST a discussion with visual aids. I'm fine with those and any other kinds of threads existing (along with everything else under the sun, even if the threads aren't my personal fetish), but how can the mods justify this? If they're claiming they're just trying to enforce the rules, why are there several threads containing bestiality? They're talking about poor quality content but I can find garbage edits in pretty much every thread.

I'm really confused as to how the mod is justifying this, because there doesn't seem to be any valid way to justify it.

>>7514970

Because there is not a valid justification, it's just a mod's autistic screeching and banning anything he doesn't like.

Imagine being a mod on a Mongolian underwater basket weaving board, and getting this upset at people creating original content.

I don't like captions, and I think the censoring fetish is pretty dumb, but the idea that these threads should be removed is absolute insanity. Especially when there are so many incredibly weak threads that are all just slightly different flavors of futa that could easily be condensed.

I don't mind removing ERP threads, but that's a slippery slope because there are plenty of low content threads that occasionally get filled up with faggots who just want to blog and share their gay little fantasies. I'd rather see the offending posts get banned rather than the whole thread, unless it is just a glorified excuse to blog like /gfd/ and global fetish crap.

>>7514366
they could be making a point about the "I don't like it so it's low quality" moderation

>>7514970
The mod doesn't justify himself at all, he makes his own fake rules and doesn't follow them.
He probably loves browsing the Globalized fetish threads because if he didn't than they would be gone.

>>7514849

I have a feeling the mod is deliberately fucking with the userbase, shitposting in these threads and giggling about the drama.

either way, problem would be fixed if we had some means of removing shitty mods but, welp

Ban fart threads. They are literally stealth scat threads.

>>7515233
No that's stupid, unless there's actual scat in the threads just remove the scat and leave the rest, no need to ban the entire thread.

>>7514859
This goes well beyond enforcing their 'rules'. this is just them being autistic cunts.

You know what's the worst and I mean the WORST thing about all of this?
The mod didn't even put a high quality /d. image in his sticky!

>>7514705
Probably to replace it with a new one.

>>7515365
Big surprise mods not following their own rules.

File: rlymakesyathink.png (150KB, 1900x536px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1900x536px

Sounds like there really is some IRC influence at work. The mods got tricked, as usual.

>>7515416
100~ votes is nothing to try and gauge a community's opinion. Other meta threads got more than 71 posters as well. And hardly everybody posts in a meta thread.
In short, it means nothing.

>>7514224
Amen. Fuck aspie scum mods.

>>7514224
>the only people who wanted those threads gone were a whiny bitch-ass minority
>3 meta threads filled with tears later

File: uhh.png (335KB, 1600x720px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1600x720px

>>7515421
What was the deal with that person who always said "you guys", anyway? As if everyone in the banned threads were buddies. It was so weird to hear that on 4chan of all places.

>>7515437
It's easier to discuss things if you group people together sometimes. And because everybody's anonymous, and you not having enough time to learn who you're really talking to, it's not a leap to assume the people you're talking to are the people that agree with the OP in general.
There are basically two groups, right? The one that think the bans are wrong, and the one that think the bans are right?

Not him by the way. I try to not assume things, but I can see why somebody would do it.

>>7515445
Yeah, it is easier to discuss things if you just make up stuff that isn't true. /d/ threads have minimal cross-pollination compared to other boards because they're fetish-based. I personally had nothing to do with writethreads or CYOA or /bdsmg/, so why are those posters being lumped with me? Why am I being lumped with them? Because we agree on some things and disagree on others? It's just a poisonous "us vs. them" mentality that hurts the board. We are individuals first and foremost.

Mods can you please ban drawthreads? They're 99% non-pornographic reference images and the threads persistently have low quality images.

Can you please double down and ban those threads too to save face?

>>7515503
I generally agree with you, but my points still stand. In a perfect world you'd consider everybody as an individual, that is however impossible in a lot of situations, this possibly being one of them.

Why is /d/ so awful? Why is /d/'s moderation consistently the worst on the site?

At this point /d/ is just a shitty ghetto version of /aco/.

>>7514855
It was too gay even for here. Good riddance, I say,

File: perhaps.jpg (233KB, 760x296px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 760x296px

>>7514434
>efg
I miss it, too.

I've got the discord, Literotica and other places to hang, but I will still miss it. No point crying over milk that someone else spilled maliciously.

>>7515581
kys

File: 927c09749c70688cdddb69678f51205b.jpg (7KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 150x150px

>>7515581
>too gay even for here
Nothing is too gay for /d/ you cannot have enough dicks.

>>7515628
An analysis of this thread:
Loli, Shotacon, Mommydom fetish, the same images which have been posted over and over again for years. Zero originality. Shit thread. Typical of CYOAs for the last few years.

Why are you surprised you got banned for this?

File: cavalcade of insults.png (578KB, 2000x1400px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 2000x1400px

>>7515437
anyone can do this anon

its really easy to make the banned communities look bad too

Oh hey, look what's still up?
>>7514196
Look at all that high quality, weird fetish porn. It's definately not just random anime girls in outfits, no sir!

File: 1416866447800.gif (927KB, 250x230px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 250x230px

>>7515741
>inb4 colossal butthurt

>>7513976
>inflation
Are there any oldfags left in /d/? We can barely get along with each other.
>>7514317
My two cents is we can't get along with each other. male vs. female, full body or sphere vs. belly or breasts, fiction vs. real. The poor quality of the majority of content doesn't help it at all.

>>7515740
>>>/d/
An analysis of the current state of this board:
25% redundant futa threads, a bunch of trap threads which are just shotacon threads, the same images which have been posted over and over again for years because OC generation is frowned upon. Less than zero originality.

Sounds like it fits right in to me.

>>7515741
oh wow, they really did say all that shit...

>>7515742
>people posting anime porn on an anime board

what a surprise...? what are we supposed to be seeing here anon?

>>7515755
Since when does anyone on 4chan give a shit about outside communities?

we ban twitch links and shit for a reason you summer fag, it's why 八chan is filtered

plenty of people in the banned threads had communities outside of 4chan but no one in them tries to organize raids against 4chan or anything like those IRC guys did

>>7515437
lol btfo
>>7515741

>>7515741
>"You insulted all of dubschan"
Oh no, what a terrible fucking thing to do, the poor feelings of the people on redditchan.

>Every deleted board deserves to be brought back
Yeah, bring back /i/nvasion, /g/uro, and /l/oli! That's a smart fucking idea!

>You can't fill a board with 2-3 topics worth of people
Well, going by your logic, you just insulted every user of /qst/. Good job.

>/d/ offshoot discords are the actual /d/ board
It's -really- fucking easy to invite non /d/ users into a fetish discord, and there's no real reason not to unless you're trying to be a hardass. So no, a discord server does not accurately represent the board users. Dipshit.

>>7515766
>I DONT CARE ABOUT LITERALLY ANYONE ELSE EVEN THOUGH MOST COMMUNITIES ON /d/ HAVE EXTERNAL COMMUNITIES

Glad to see that wasn't just cherrypicking and this is actually how you reprobates think. >>>/trash/

>>7515765
What porn? There's 2 /d/ related images, the rest could go on blue board or, at worst, /h/. You need 5 board+topic related images to start a thread with, or else it's considered a request thread. That right there is a violation.

Besides that, There's little to no porn. They're posting fully clothed images in not-sexy situations. Shit, I don't know if /fa/ allows anime images, but if they do you could delete 3 pots and move it there just fine.

>>7515770
What about the part where you insult ~80% of the fucking planet?

>>7515766
>>7515770
>damage control this hard

>>7515772
>outside communities represent /d/

Let's go ask /vp/ what they think about caption threads then. Throw up a poll on /out/ to see if our mod is doing their job.

>>7515775
Then report it and stop bitching. No one here bitched about the shitty edit threads, we just reported them.

>>7515776
Oh no, I'm sure Austrailia gives a shit what some random twat thinks of them. Shit, they'd probably throw a better insult back, so don't act like everyone else is made of glass just because you are.

File: C9JUQW-XUAABjRW.jpg (59KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1200x675px

>>7515772
Go ask your friends on r*ddit how they feel, idiot

>>7515781
Already did. Just reminding everyone that the mod not only can't follow their own rules, but they can't even follow the actual posted rules. Hell, the sticky itself says the board is for alternative hentai, and there's little of that in that thread, so he can't even remember what he said a day ago.

>>7515779
You're the guys who made the poll, remember? But all of a sudden polls don't matter when they go against you.

>>7514389
>few
have you ever been in one? their numbers aren't "few". we can be happy if one thread isn't 50% derailed by internal shitflinging.
>>7514301
yes. except for a tiny minority of co-fetishists. yes, it is.

>>7515787
I didn't make shit, and I'm not even from that thread. I was just laughing about the dipshit running around like a chicken with his head cut off because people insulted his reddit buddies and threw out grade-school insults.

>hey guys if we turn this thread into an echo chamber we can convince ourselves of anything
>OH NO PEOPLE DISAGREE WITH US DEFEND THE HUGBOX DEFEND THE SAFE SPACE

Wow you guys are pathetic.

>>7514389
>if those few mega-autismo shitposters that derail every other thread are reigned in.
Too much work for the mods and jannys, easier to just ban the whole thread.

>>7515796
stop raping me!
police, help!

>>7515796
>Let's talk about community issues
>HEY GUYS DID YOU HEAR WHAT NEOGAF THINKS?

You're a fucking moron.

>>7515744
yep you were right
>>7515770
>>7515766

>>7515801
What does neogaf have to do with anything? All I'm saying is you guys are trying to drive away any objecting opinions by being aggressive as fuck because since you got banned the hugbox is all you have left.

>>7514419
Define expansion as "flesh increasing in volume" and inflation as "filling up without physiological consequences like weight gain of food poisoning" and we're good.
>>7514125
A damn shame.

>>7515805
Because your idea of not driving away other opinions is bringing in people who don't matter to the conversation at hand.

>>7515810
What the actual fuck are you talking about anon? All I said is you guys are being aggressive as fuck, but now seemingly you're trying a new tactic, just talking random gibberish in the hopes that people who disagree with you will just leave you alone out of pity?

File: 1473205823402.png (24KB, 291x293px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 291x293px

>>7515802
>(You) in charge of identifying the difference between butthurt and being made fun of

>>7515437
>>7515741
get absolutely fucked cucked threads

>>7515812
Read the diatribe you posted in that image again (>>7515741). Every argument is "BUT WHAT ABOUT DUBSCHAN? WHAT ABOUT REDDIT? WHAT ABOUT DISCORD?". Those are things that don't fucking matter because they are not part of the community, and this is a community discussion.

It's also entirely possible now that I think about it that I'm replying to someone who is not that guy, in which case ignore me I'm dumb.

>>7515437
Nice caption pic faggot

>>7515822
I didn't post that image, you dumb fuck. Not everyone who disagrees with you is the same person, but thanks for being a shining example of what a hugbox usually does, tries to convince themselves that everyone being drawn to make fun of them is "Just one nasty troll" so they can compartmentalize and forget the idea that they have made a colossal mistake and ignore their problems for as long as possible before the inevitable meltdown.

>>7515830

There's a difference between hugboxing and this.

In this case it's one samefag going out of his way to drag in people from outside 4chan as his personal army.

File: 1495412475499.jpg (29KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 320x320px

>>7515812
if it's any solace that's how we flationfags are in our generals when we're saying "stop liking what I like".

having this kink is hell.

>>7515830
Nice persecution complex fag. "THEY DIDN'T LISTEN TO ME SO THEY'RE ALL JUST GOING TO JERK THEMSELVES AROUND WAAAAH". And someone mistakes you for someone else they're arguing with on an anonymous imageboard, that definitely is a huge conspiracy. Nice logic, ace.

>>7515830
You do know that, unlike Reddit, people don't have user IDs here so it's really easy to confuse different people, right? Take a chill pill.

>>7515776
the remaining ~20% is faggots

there we go

everybody's insulted

look what you made me do

I hope you're satisfied with this state of affairs

>>7515845
Really? Doesn't seem much different to me from the last ten times I've seen it on /d/. The sooner you guys leave the better.

>>7515854
At least you're admitting to your attempt at gentrification.

>>7515766
How new are you?

Anybody noticed how this thread was fine until the banned communities showed up?

It was a civil conversation, no autism, no screeching, no insults.

Kind of proves their point for them.

>>7515766
>pretty much the majority of /d/

Yeah who gives a shit about 4/5 people on here, right?

>>7515862
Yeah, they showed up and made points, then everyone else started sperging out. Really makes you think, huh?

>>7515861

I bet you got here after gook moot...

>>7515865

why are you guys getting so butthurt that no one cares about your little faggy irc chatrooms?

>>7515859
Wow, the liberalist college campus protestor is strong with this one.

>>7515866
There were plenty of retards without legitimate points from the "banned side".

>>7515865
>Outside communities make up /d/
Then should we move this thread to /f/? Or maybe to /r/fetish? Maybe we should go make an AOL chat to properly poll the TRUE /d/ community.

>>7515868
I bet you got her after /b/ was good.

>>7515866
Let's take a look at when they first showed up anon.
>>7514118
>>7514138
>>7514125

Seems like they pretty much immediately started shitposting without anyone even responding to them anon.

>>7515874
I bet you got here after /l/

>>7515877
I bet you got here after /z/.

>>7515872
>people using outside websites means we should just abandon /d/ altogether

God forbid people want to socialize in a way that doesn't require you to take a 60 second break between sentences anon.

>>7515881
I bet you got here after snacks

>>7515884
I bet you got here after 2.0

>>7515882
There's nothing wrong with outside communities

there is however something wrong with bragging in a thread that you're getting a bunch of your friends in an outside community to come and shitpost in a thread on 4chan

>>7515869
>Hey, if you original posters left, we could make this into /r/kink fina- er I mean it would be a better place!
>get called out
>L-LIBURAL! SJW! SKUM! REEEEEEEEE

Go back to Kekistan, """"""""/pol/""""""""lack

>>7515871
There's plenty of retards without legit points from every side. What's your point?

>>7515888
buddy, let me tell you something, I was there when little moot came into this world, I was standing there outside the hospital window watching his mother push his pink little body out her straining hole, her throes of anguish and the small tinges of pleasure, you see, a raven visited me that day, he whispered to me in Sumerian, I can't recall exactly what he said, but I knew, that on that day, a great evil had entered our mortal realm, I had attempted to break through the window but my efforts were stopped by a passerby who placed me under citizens arrest for masturbating in public while looking into a hospital, I spent the next 15 years of my life hunting for that demon child until I had to eventually give up due to my paint supply show not doing so great and expenditures getting a little out of hand, now I roam these boards as an old man, and I watch the evil it inflicts upon people, if only I had the strength to break that glass...

>>7515882
>Communities represent other communities
It doesn't matter if they spun off from /d/ and everyone there is a /d/eviant, once they're formed as an outside community they can't be considered as a reliable reflection of the actual board's community. That'd be like if you took a group of Chicagoans that now live in Houston and included their data in a survey about the opinions of people from Chicago. They're from there, yes, but they're no longer part of the community. If they move back and reintegrate themselves, sure, but at the moment it's a no.

>>7515876
>All of those posts have responses
(You)

>>7515902
>What's your point?
That his argument of the "banned side" only showing up and making legit points is wrong.

>>7515878
Anon you should have more in life than looking for a nemesis one internet. I really mean that. you should have more than that in life. I know your response to this is going to be defensive because you feel under attack, because let's face it, you are, but if this is really the only thing in your life you have to dedicate yourself to then you need to understand that isn't healthy. I am really, honestly concerned for your mental health. I think the mods should look into unbanning the threads for a few days while they try to contact you, because I really am worried about what losing them means to you if you are this invested.

When I read these threads, and at the risk of echoing sentiments used by others, I think I'm starting to recognize a person behind the anonymity.

You should have more to do with your life than this anon, and there is so much more in life than the internet. I hope you know that.

I know you're going to want to see this as an attack, construe this as somehow feeding into whats going on, but I hope you can see the human message behind this anonymity. I am seriously worried about you as a fellow human being. If insulting me and replying to this post because you're worried about losing face now people are paying attention to you and that's something new for you and you don't want to lose that then go for it if it helps you. I just hope some part of you hears what I'm trying to say, and I hope you don't do anything stupid.

You have aright to be here, and you have a right to say what you're saying, but you seem unhealthily involved and invested. Please think about what I had to say the same way I'm trying to understand what's going on with you. I hope you know this board is more than just images and porn it's a community, and if you have ever believed that, even on just a base level, then I hope you'll listen.

>>7515905
9/10 it's okay pasta.

>>7515911
You implied in
>>7515866
that it was the responses that made those people post the way they did, but their posts were aggressive before anyone responded to them.

>>7515919
I really tried, anon. If you can't see past this imagined nemesis of yours then please just try to stay in control. Don't do anything stupid.

>>7515916
>but their posts were aggressive before anyone responded to them.
Where's the aggression?

>>7515927
>If the mods did their jobs, sure, but they don't. Even though I disagree with that rule, it is an actual admin-made rule, so I can still shit on the mods for not even following actual rules.
>Mods don't do their job
>shit on the mods

>I don't want to deal with shitposter-kun anymore than I have to
>already being extremely argumentative, begging for aggressive replies

>And, because the Mods are lazy, they ban the origin rather than deleting only the offending images.
>Mods are lazy.

They showed up already having made their minds up that all mods are bad, which suggests a very defensive attitude and lack of any willingness to broach opposing viewpoints.

The very idea that all the mods are bad, when the collective view of the banned communities seems to be that it's one mod on a power trip, is just insulting to the mods as a whole.

>>7515944
When you feel attacked, naturally you're not going to have a high opinion on the one who "attacked" you. If anything, the complaint about doing their job feels like one that would be changed if the mod would be more consistent in his modding (at least, the second sentence gives me that idea).

The shitposter-kun thing is referring to a person from the previous thread who was also highly argumentative, though that is a bit defensive too.

The last guy is using an example of why the mods are lazy to say that they are, while he's probably more stuck in it's still a little more constructive than someone yelling out MODS R LZEE without anything else said.

I guess I see where you see aggression now, but I don't fully agree that it's just pointless and mindless.

>>7515964
Doesn't change the fact they came into a perfectly calm and peaceful thread and caused a shitstorm, which they started. That's the entire point. Things were fine until they showed up, and predictably, pretty much everyone who was discussing something else has been driven away since then.

That's all I was trying to get across. The fact that they've been banned is no excuse to ruin other threads.

>>7515944

All mods are fucking bad you retard, where have you been the past 13 years on 4chan?

Outside of that one mod who fucking made /a/ his personal fief because he actually likes the board, they're all garbage. It's a good day on 4chan the mods are simply objective and do the minimum work.

And have you ever considered that those posters are talking about, oh, I dunno, the previous two threads that did, in fat, have shitposter-kun? Or that the mods have repeatedly shown how garbage they are in this case, since instead of telling their autistic colleague to shut the fuck up and hide the thread, they go to the fucking hilt for him.

But nope, it's gotta be all the banned communities fault and they have no valid points at all! Guess we found the fucking newfag who's only here for (you)s and to shit up threads.

>>7515968
See? This is the aggression I mean. You guys are driving away everyone else from this thread the way people are saying you drove people away from your own threads. You just seem to be proving them right.

>>7515919
>>7515878
Heh, I was being called that last thread. A bit stupid to assume you're talking to one person then mate.
>>7515968
Same for you.

>>7515967
They in no way ruined the thread, though. I don't know what shitstorm you're seeing, but if you think this is one then you don't really know anything about shitstorms. It sounds more like you're upset that they're talking about something you don't want to talk about and you're having a problem dealing wit hthat.

>>7515975
>Only one person can be a shitposter at a time
Cool story, bros.

>>7515977
That's the implication by using a name. Or at least the implication that you bring forth by using a name.

>>7515974
>the way people are saying you drove people away from your own threads.
Driving away people from redditchan isn't a bad thing my man.

>>7515979
>Only one person can have any given name
Stories keep getting cooler.

File: FQ11-1.png (350KB, 640x582px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 640x582px

Are there any previous Futa Quest thread regulars here? We've moved on to Discord server. I know not everyone will be happy with the decision but it's better than /trash/.

>>7515981
That's not what I said, all I said is that you imply the person is a certain person by giving him a specific name like that.

>>7515976
>de nile

>>7515983
Yeah, why the fuck are primarily image based, OC driven CYOA threads being banned?

>>7515983
Might want to provide a link?

File: napster.jpg (75KB, 235x555px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 235x555px

>>7515983
>This is lower quality art than Shadman according to the mod
My fucking sides

>>7515983
I thought all discords were circle jerks anon?

>>7515988

Because even though the OP is drawing each image specifically for the thread, 15-20 brand new images per thread isn't enough for the autistic mod, and thus it was banned.

Even though, y'know, it's /d/ as fuck.

>>7515984
The only thing you imply is that the person is a shitposter, not "the" shitposter.

>>7515983
fuck you guys, you call us all circle jerkers then go and make your own?

i would love to have a link to your little community

>>7515991
No, you don't understand, CYOAs are BAD

>>7515987
>can't provide proofs

>>7515983
>this is the kind of quality content we're missing

And nothing of value was lost.

>>7515992
Mod's making /d/ into his own personal circlejerk, so there's really no difference at this point.

File: 1421622967698.gif (2MB, 180x135px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 180x135px

>>7515983
>ALL EXTERNAL /d/ COMMUNITIES ARE SHIT AND NONE OF THEM MATTER
>p-please come join our discord

>>7515994
No, that would be the implication if you just called him a shitposter, which is common lingo on 4chan. By appending kun, which isn't common in English or 4chan, you create a specific name. There's also the fact in how you use it, as a singular person instead of using it as a group identifier (shitposter-kun vs. shitposters).
If you wanted to identify him as just a shitposter, you should just call him that instead of inventing something new.

>>7516000
I'm glad we get rid of that, we get more room like real /d/eviant porn like >>7515403 or >>7515366

>>7515983
Link please? I promise no one will destroy it. We just want to say hello to the latest circle jerk community!

>>7516008
>inventing something new.
If you've never heard faggot-kun or shitposter-kun before then you may be newer than you realize. Please lurk more.