>Just no.
http://www.gunnerkrigg.com/
>>80798244
shot down quick
>>80798244
Who cares about the most boring couple in the whole comic? Go back to Annie learning her powers. Or Robot and Shadow.
>>80798244
How long until Annie tells Kat
I don't get it, what does Carol get out of her relationship with Jessica? Spiderwoman is a complete fucking failure at life and if anything, Carol seems to be enabling her self-destructive actions. I know everyone jokes that they're in a secret lesbian relationship with each other, but honestly that's the only explanation that makes sense at this point.
>>80797704
Codependency's a hell of a drug.
Out in several hours
>>80797704
I guess you don't have any friends that are fuckups?
I'm not judging, I'm just curious
Why does the "fractured fairy tale" genre do so well with women? I remember reading somewhere that Fables sells like gangbusters with female readers, and then there's things like Once Upon A Time and the entire Zenescope comic lineup.
>>80797495
because fairytales as a genre is almost exclusively marketed toward women. disney basically ensured that entire generations of young girls grow up with fairytales, especially those involving princesses. Fables and Once Upon a Time and others only build upon what Disney began in the lives of young girls.
>>80797495
>I'm not judging
You better not be. Fables was fantastic.Mostly.YOU'RE MY BOY BLUE ;_;
Jesus, I hate Fables. Not even meming. What an awful fucking mess of a comic.
The Wolf Among Us did everything it tried to do but better, so thank God it gave us that much at least.
Miss me yet?
No.
Hell no!
>>80797477
Your lucky dubs are wasted on weak b8, m8.
This YouTube series is 23 episodes into its first season. It has millions of views, with its first episode having been viewed 32,000,000 times. Despite this, it has been completely shit. I make threads for it every so often, probably because I'm nostalgic for Angela back when she had proper fur rendering.
Regardless, the fact that they released an arguably-television-production-quality series on YouTube appealed to me. I mean, it's not high production quality, but it's something I could have easily seen airing on The Hub back before it died. Here is the most recent episode.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVSlyHAzpOw
Maybe these threads would actually get a response or two if I didn't constantly point out how bad the show is. Can't blame a guy for being honest.
>>80796921
>>80797301
We have a sixth sense for shills.No, company wars don't count as shilling.
>>80797422
This isn't /v/, not that /v/'s bogeymen are real anyway. Nobody comes here to peddle their shows.
We had a good thread for this movie yesterday
Has anyone else seen it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvdp6gn-u9o
>>80796890
>a box office failure
>English dub released straight to DVD
>>80796890
I hate how french sounds
Why are there so very few villainous OTPs?
Evil people are bad at long term commitment.
Is it wrong that I want a ONS with Dr Girlfriend even tho I don't even watch Venture Bros?
Also you got plenty of that in Last Airbender people ship Azula and Sokka all the time
Also Zuko and Katara
Lex Luthor and his floor to ceiling mirror count?
How much sex do you think Batman should have?
Some people seem to think he should be a virile James Bondian shagmaster, but I dunno. He's an asocial weirdo who skulks in the shadows and spends a lot of time thinking about the most efficient ways to put muggers in the hospital. He spends all the time that he doesn't dedicate to beating up criminals either sleeping or pretending to be an idiot.
Selling Batman's effectiveness as the ultimate prepper superhero means playing up a level of OCD in the character that I think is counter to womanizing. I don't mind him having the occasional actual romance (as long as it's well written) but he's not Tony Stark. He probably shouldn't be getting a lot of loose tail on the side.
All the tail he needs is from a little birdie
>>80796242
I think that he should occasionally have a meaningless fling, it humanizes him a bit to actually enjoy his public persona sometimes.
>>80796242
Yeah... no. His detachment lends itself more to meaningless flings. People who are against being vulnerable tend to avoid having serious relationships.
I'm just gonna go ahead and leave this here.
>guaranteed_replies.jpg
WoY lasted a solid 2 seasons, that's not so bad.
>>80795954
>recess
>not god tier
>"the DC extended universe"
Who the fuck chose this shitty title for a franchise?
What was wrong with calling it the DC cinematic universe?
what an interesting question
why should they? maybe the name will be key for something on the future.
>>80795638
they already copied marvel in rushing a movie universe
they didnt want to copy the name too
Was it?
Not really
I remember the final episodes of Rugrats, ATBG, and Thornberries aired then. Otherwise it's a total blank.
>>80794837
Better than 2016and 2015and 2014and 2013;_;
ITT: 10/10 openings ONLY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWBIGd6BvKs
https://youtu.be/sO_371leHlo
>>80794756
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pACYbBhCzXc
>0:15It wasn't even a good show, what did it do to deserve that godly riff
This one will always have a special place for me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAsDL7f3veM
hokay
so here's the earth
>>80793989
That's a picture of the earth.
>>80793989
Can I fuck the earth?
but I am le tired
What would a comic about 4chan would look like?
wouldn't it just be a series of ms-paint strawman comics?
Here's to you /rs/
>>80793608
tasty
http://comicbook.com/2016/03/15/what-does-indiana-jones-5-announcement-mean-for-marvels-inhumans/
>>Disney today announced a new Indiana Jones movie, the fifth in the series. Harrison Ford is returning to star in the movie, the first since Disney purchased Lucasfilm, with Steven Spielberg returning to direct.
>>They also announced the release date: July 19, 2019. For those who keep up with movie release schedules, that's exactly one week after the previously announced date for Marvel Studios' Inhumans, a movie announced as part of their large extended slate, but rarely talked about since. Marvel Studios is also owned by Disney.
So what does the Indiana Jones 5 announcement mean for Inhumans? It means the latter movie probably isn't coming out on July 12, 2019, if at all. Since the initial announcement, Inhumans - the concept and relatively minor characters from the pages of Marvel Comics - have appeared on the TV show Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. That contributed to rumors last fall that Inhumans - the Marvel Studios film - had been removed from their movie slate. Conflicting reports said that it's still on, and will feature the Inhumans royal family - Black Bolt, Medusa, and other characters from the franchise.
>>While Disney has an incredibly busy film slate in 2019 - Captain Marvel, an Untitled Walt Disney Animation Studios Movie, Avengers: Infinity War Part II, Star Wars: Episode IX, The Incredibles 2, Indiana Jones 5, and another Live-Action Fairy-Tale remake are all on the docket - it's unthinkable for them to put out two movies in back-to-back weeks, especially two tent pole releases. Canibalizing their own business is bad business - you'll see releases coming as frequently as three weeks apart, but never less than that.
Dead film!
>>80793240
I'd rather watch inhumans tbqh
>>80793698
New franchise over keeping one on life support.