Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 73. page

>>9146280
>cant do basic elementary school mathematics
>posts trump
classic burger trash.

>>9146237
solve by induction. You can do it in your head.

File: mathandstuff.png (3KB, 252x135px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 252x135px

Correction

>>9146243
I don't understand how many terms that sum has, could you elaborate?

It's obviously dancing.

>>9146236
Fasciculation. Random nerve short-circuits and fires all by itself.

Random fasciculations from time to time are meaningless -- persistent ones in the same place probably need to get checked out, can be early signs of several neurological issues.

>>9146318
As far as I remember, they basically don't happen with active usage of the muscle. The nerves can't misfire if they're constantly set and reset.

File: 1478041032659.jpg (1MB, 1897x2500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1897x2500px

Dude, you shouldn't ask me about this; I've never been wrong. Ask other people on /sci/ instead.

You can always be wrong with politics, finance, philosophy or religion, lifestyle, ect.

Google didn't destroy anything worth keeping around. Now barflys can have dumb arguments about the tunction of an observer in a closed system vs an argument on if a Hayabusa motorcycle accerlates faster than a McLaren.

One Google is equick to give an answer for is an argument that never should have happened anyways.

One benefit to being wrong is you can later become right. It's all about improvement. For this reason, I intentionally keep the list of things I am wrong about at least 10 items long. Recently someone proved to me that traps were gay. I crossed an item off my list. I now believe that GMOs cause cancer.

>>9146189
whores

>>9146219
I am looking for scientific explanations.

>>9146189
Im wondering this same question. Trying to get my anwser from JBP since he is always talking about issues like this, but I don't think he understands why either

Yeah it takes maybe an hour or two out of your day to get swole.

If your not a brainlet that needs yo study or a sloth it should be easy.

File: 1501190091338.png (910KB, 841x1200px) Image search: [Google]

910KB, 841x1200px

What is the most patrician mathematics and why is it geometry in 3 or fewer dimensions?

>>9146169
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurobiological_effects_of_physical_exercise

>>9146155
NASA has funded a few of my research projects, so I am familiar with the funding philosophy.
NASA should fund both of the areas you mentioned and a few more.
They already cover terrestrial studies for climate change, they already design spacecraft, and they already explore space.
In addition, they also fund terrestrial projects that support space exploration missions and science education. An example of the first case is a project that seeks out rocks similar to those on Mars so engineers can test the Mars 2020 rover before they shoot it off. Any number of projects fit under the second case, but in the long run, they want to keep future generations interested in science and engineering.

>>9146181
the USA has NOAA and other agencies that can do the earth only studies.

>>9146199
Which would be fine if the funding was transferred (plus additional overheads) but that's not what is being considered here. NOAA just took a big hit and it's probably going to get worse. This whole "focusing on space" nonsense has nothing to do with exploration, it has everything to do with Republicans defunding climate change research.

Swapping everything over makes literally zero sense, NASA is already the subcontractor for NOAA's space activities. It would just be rearranging the furniture. It's almost as if there is a hidden agenda.

>>9146132
Genius.
Son of a bitch.

>>9146124
https://9e03eee4-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/nhojwww/library/Dennett%20-%20Consciousness%20Explained.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7coEPBe8iBkALEQVOFr-PzlMvvhucJk6YI29Kt6a2AQyFTLAfy51hmSZGduLQp-KrQBhnhpWUTIbBsOjf6-_n0NGfKrlxft3agrmZjvhvwtSOKU-8P0Cg5U8TYVISzh7lfEZhuNmp8MHEYif8jeBgCjashr_PnkP1zYIw_oC136HOSsiBQqPrjR6P0FGfZkT0M1Q4VUmaTWUFfn5fHyPLGb7NYgY49lb7FCs1Mvh62X_xEeBQuCr-bh6icpvbOzbtuY67y5e&attredirects=0

>>9146124
there are none.

>>9146124
http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~karl/Consciousness,%20dreams%20and%20inference.pdf

>>9146100
Yeah there are a tremendous number of people looking up with telescopes and instruments and they can and do track shit like broken rivets from long ago orbital missions.

Probably a zero percent chance of a asteroid coming toward earth unnoticed.

Unless it was moving at relavistic speed was very small and approached perpendicular to the solar plane.

>>9146100
>How bright our vision is out of the world?
Given there are true flat-Earthers, I'd say not very bright.

>Could we see easily every object in the space which is getting close to the Earth?
You'd have to define "easily" and "close," and do you really mean *every* object?
Certainly not every object. Go out and watch a meteor shower. None of those are predicted (except the shower as a whole, and that's because the showers are periodic).

>Can a celestial object(meteor or something else) hit the Earth suprisingly?
Absolutely, yes. Remember a few years back, Chebaylnsklhdfnasf whatever?

Here's a shocker for you: Go to Ron Baalke's Space Calendar at JPL.
www2.jpl.nasa.gov/calendar
Do a Ctrl-F on "roid 2017" Those are asteroids that were *discovered* in 2017. Then take a look at closest approach. If they get closer than 0.000x AU, that's pretty close.
And there's no guarantee that we'd see an interloper coming in from having passed by the Sun.

>>9146100
If the object happens to pass by from the inner solar system (which means it approaches from the sun-side of the planet) it is very hard to see because the sunlit side of the object is facing away from us.

Objects approaching from beyond earth orbit have the sunlit side facing us so they are much easier to see, however space is still very very big and the objects are very small so they can be extremely hard to find until they get pretty close.

>>9145945
they will probably go into finance and make a lot of money
they probably tricked themselves into thinking it's not that bad not to get a tenured position in academia

File: 1491584324664.jpg (5KB, 195x179px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 195x179px

>sub 100 IQ
>at least I'm not a frogposter

Because they realize that since they're average, there is no reason to stress out over outcompeting everyone in life.

Is the the world view of the typical i fucknig love science high schooler?

>>9145906
Are you unable to participate in this discussion, Tim?

>>9145902
B
when one feels down, it is very tempting to pretend some protecting god is out there somewhere, and always will be

>>9145901
?? = 19
Polygon shapes = each node count as 1
bananas = each banana count as 1
clock = each hour count as 1

19

>>9145901
3x = 45
therefore
x = 15

2y + x = 23
Substitution
2y + 15 = 23
Therefore
y = 4


2z + y = 10
Substitution
2z + 4 = 10
Therefore
z = 3

2y + z + x = ?
Substitution
2(4) + 3 + 15 = 26
QED

Sounds like you don't do enough exercises.

You 'get' it quickly but you don't sit down and do math enough.

Very common problem among math grad students

t. 2nd year phd

>>9145897
Yeah but I'm asking because I don't actually feel like working will help me at all.
Granted I don't work much (if ever) outside of uni but I don't think that's the problem.
It's like I lack the ability to apply what I know to be true.
Is this what the HIGH VERBAL and LOW PERFORMANCE meme feels like? Or just brainletism?

but I guess it won't hurt to try

;-;

>>9145892
Measure out a gradient of 1:1.73 using the ruler and compass. Brainlet babby teir homework question OP.

File: sc.png (8KB, 281x263px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 281x263px

Straightedge and compass CHAD coming through
(seriously though it IS babby tier)