Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 455. page

Cherry pie delicious nigga

>>8970816
Yo but Tau makes more sense tho?

>>8970811
Tau is superior but realistically it's not going to replace pi anytime soon if ever.

>>8970677
Yes.

An antigravity fount? There are scifi possibilities in that... any of you guys write?

>>8970681
OP here, i've just been thinking about it, i write a little. and my mind was just confused by it. if gravity is essentially intensified by this, and the force is one that "pulls", would the opposite, a gravity hill, say, repulse?

also, i had the question about dark matter come to me, the concept that it influences matter by degrees enough to ensure that present models in space hold together, galaxies or whatever, is there an opposing influence by matter on dark matter? can dark matter be manipulated theoretically by using an inverse of the same principles it uses to manipulate matter?

>>8970681
also, are there models of omnidirection? are you sure it's omnidirectional, or are there angles that it theoretically doesn't apply to?

>>8973393
There is nothing wrong with a company acting to protect it's investment for a limited period of time. Anyone that disagrees will kill any investment in progress.

t. leech

String up the bourgeoisie and the corporatists

looking for some old, open conjectures in number theory to practice coding/run computational tests on to see if there's large counterexamples

Im chillin before my cal 2 final that's in 30 minutes

fuck off anime

dont be a brainlet

File: c0f676a475de5258e2d7e4c145187dc0.png (488KB, 531x566px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 531x566px

>>8973054
But I don't want to be one, that's why I'm studying.

Lol, i'm in the same boat OP. Adderall, helped me get through this last quarter

Here is an awakening experience that occurred after Lexapro use was begun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xurrSBep8is

>>8972965
>Kundalini Awakening
>>>/x/

>>8972967
No anon, real thing. If a drug company could create an enlightenment pill, how much money would that make them? They are always trying to produce performance enhancing drugs. Lexapro is known to cause major rewiring of the brain in just THREE HOURS. you should take the time to watch this video. The same damn thing happened to me on prozac.

Before layout, think contents
Before contents, think about who your audience is.

>>8972848
Nice poster, I'm borrowing it.

>>8973715
Don't listen to them just copy and paste shit till it makes sense. Use pictures lots of pictures. Nobody's gonna read that shit

>>8972786
Is medicine/medical research a STEM field?

>>8972786
I think you mean "STEAM"

>>8972798
OP: I think so...

>>8972375
Also, this counts as science right? Wasn't sure where to put it.

>>8972375
pedo here
I'm like that without the fendom? shit.

Being a pedo is really annoying, senpai.

>>8972375
If they are attracted to children, then yes they are pedophiles.
It's not like pedophiles chose to be sexually attracted to children, like actual homosexuals didn't choose to be attractred to people of the same sex.

>>8972362
It is true if P and Q are both true.
It's also true if P is false

When you read "if P then Q" you should interpret it as "if P is true then Q must be true".

It says nothing about what happens if P is false. If P is false there is no requirement.

>>8972362
The case where P(x) is false and the statement is true is an example of vacuous truth. I like to think of it this way:
I tell you "If you give me 20 dollars, I'll give you an A in the class", if you don't give me 20 dollars and I give you a B, did I lie? In logic, the answer is no.

>>8972362
>>8972371
Also with the universal, if you want the universal to be true [math]\forall x(P(x) \rightarrow Q(x))[/math], this universal is saying "All things that hold the property P, also hold the property Q" it says nothing about things that are Q and not P, nor does it say anything about things that are not P.
[math]\forall x(P(x) \wedge Q(x))[/math]
Says that everything is both P and Q, which is a much stronger statement.

>>8972345
NCfag here-- will be driving down to the path of totality as it crosses just south of here in SC.

I have not seen a total eclipse in several decades, but it is well worth some effort to see.

Protip: Make sure to be some place you can see what happens to sunlight filtering through leaves on the trees as the moon starts to cover the sun -- but of course you need to be able to step out and have a clear view of the sun when you get close to totality.

>>8972367

I gave in and bought eclipse glasses for my gf and me.

MOfag here. I live directly in the path of the eclipse. Going to Giant City state park though with a friend to enjoy nature for the day.

By using extant energy, fucktard

>>8972101
https://youtu.be/zO2vfYNaIbk?t=50s

I don't know if you are retarded or just didn't realize this, but I hope you meant "How can the universe be expanding with a positive acceleration "
I give this a 0.75 probability of being bait

Holy shit every time I ask for help, or try to study math from foreign books, or watch videos on maths it's always retarded levels on Calc. 1, 2 & 3. It seems that you people don't do half of shit we study in my shitty third world country. How the fuck.

>>8972076
>Apparently you can just substitute (1/n,1/n) and let n->inf, then (1/n,-1/n) and let n->inf, and if the answers match you have proven the limit exists?

No fucking way. You are retarded OP, because it would be really easy to disprove this theorem.

Consider the surface [math] z = \frac{|x|}{|y|} [/math]
Now go kill yourself, brainletto.

t. Someone living and studying in a third world country, so if you couldn't even do this then I would suggest that you categorize your country as something even shittier because you are shit amongst shit.

>>8972131
I'm asking you dumb fuck, of course I don't know what is it and does it even work. I'm just saying every time I ask anything, nobody has ever heard of it.

So you're saying the shit in the pic related doesn't even exist? That my prof. pulled it out of his ass? I'm not saying it definitely does prove that the limit exist, I said that's what somebody wrote in the notebook and that it's fishy.

The point of the question, you dumb asshole, was what is it, does anyone recognize something like this being used to work on multivariable limits. Jesus.

>>8972042
>Dawkins

>>>/reddit/ is that way

>>8972042
Heisenberg's Physics and Philosophy

The universe really is just massively different than the way it appears to us

>>8972045
What does dawkins have to do with reddit?

I don't visit the site as much as you so i don't really understand the association.

>>8971616
>Interesting
Pareidolia is the opposite of interesting.

>>8971621
Thanks

really makes you think, huh