>inb4 python, c fags and so on
SageMath faggot
>>8972256
>t. actual faggot
Q.E.D.
Prove it wrong.
[eqn]\forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \frac{\mathrm d \vec{p}}{\mathrm dt} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,+\, \vec{F}_{B \,\to\, A} \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,-\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,=\, \vec{0} \quad\text{then}\quad \forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \vec{p} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{p} \left( 0 \right) \,=\, \vec{0}[/eqn]
Back to 9GAG.
[math][eqn]\forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \frac{\mathrm d \vec{p}}{\mathrm dt} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,+\, \vec{F}_{B \,\to\, A} \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,-\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,=\, \vec{0} \quad\text{then}\quad \forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \vec{p} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{p} \left( 0 \right) \,=\, \vec{0}[/eqn][/math]
[math]\forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \frac{\mathrm d \vec{p}}{\mathrm dt} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,+\, \vec{F}_{B \,\to\, A} \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,-\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,=\, \vec{0} \quad\text{then}\quad \forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \vec{p} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{p} \left( 0 \right) \,=\, \vec{0}[/math]
For the record, I'm not the first poster, these latter two have been me just messing around trying to get this to display right
Test #2
/sci/ Recommend me some literature on chemical engineering
What should I read/study to broaden knowledge?
(I'm rising senior)
>Chemical Engineering
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/chemical-engineers.htm
>>8972214
How does this help me?
>>8972218
Well, it helps you to understand that your degree has shit job prospects. Maybe take your time now to try and secure a job before its too late.
>tfw disproved Einstein yet again
If you were traveling at the speed of light, from your perspective you are still, and everyone thing else around you is moving backward... at the speed of light.
Einstein says all reference frames are equally valid. And that means things with mass are traveling at light speed.
BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE
>>8971932
wrong
from the perspective of a reference frame that is moving at the speed of light every point in the universe is collocated and things observed from that reference frame appear not to be moving forward in time.
>>8971948
>jumping through mental hoops this badly to defend some dead guy like a sort of religion
I thought science was supposed to accept new evidence and not stick to archaic traditions?
Naps are miraculous.
After taking a nap I'm super refreshed, it's like I'm experiencing morning again after a good night's sleep.
Anyone has some insight and experience into this?
I'm posting here because they would be super useful during long study sessions.
>>8971311
learn to meditate. nearly the same effect, but you can go in/out of it at any time.
ive recently learned to do it with my eyes open. its great for resting your mind while looking interested.
>>8971313
Are there some good learning material availables ?
>>8971311
optimal:
1 hour exercise, .5 hour breakfast, 8 hour study classroom setting (with short lunch break), nap 2 hours, .5 hour dinner break, 4 hours of study classroom setting, relax 2 hours unstructured activity, sleep 6 hours.
no life, no life distractions. laundry and other basic maintenance accomplished in either unstructured activity or sundays.
4 years of study done in a year that way
that nap had the effect of compressing and formalizing all material learned in the first block of study so that it can be built upon with practical application in the second 4 hour study. I would dream about the study material in elaborate detail. I would unwillingly recall equations in the shower. highly effective.
>bed looks like a bed
Scientifically, what is this phenomenon called?
>>8969948
It's called OP being an idiot with a lumpy ass bed
>>8969948
no bed I ever saw looks anything like that
recognition
it can also be generalized to other objects, like when you see a car that looks like a car you can say that it was a recognition of a car
>parents dark brown haired brown eyes
>tfw blond and blue eyes
Is this possible?
>>8969489
yes
>>8969489
Blue eyes is a recessive gene, don't know about blond hair though
>>8969489
I think your dad got cucked
Science has become a commercial enterprise like so much more things on earth. When there is no financial motivation, progress slows down a lot. What can we do to counter this?
>>8969463
>What can we do to counter this?
Nothing.
The experiments that were serious business 200 years ago can be now replicated in middle school science class.
Today's serious business needs millions, sometimes hundreds of millions in funding.
So you better woo those investors or you can rope yourself.
>>8969463
>What can we do to counter this?
crowdfunding
>>8969471
t. Mars One
How will the future soldier be? Expose your theories, please
>>8967883
Invisible.
Robotic
>>8967883
The same as they are now and have been since warfare began.
>Expose your theories, please
Well established historical data.
So /sci/ how do I become an intellectual? Assume time for reading
1.) Study philosophy and logical reasoning.
2.) Find topics you are interested in
3.) Connect that topic to a major or study
4.) Master the major or study
5.) Branch out to other topics
>>8967642
Bravo, what sort of philosophy or is generally all of it
>>8967638
1) take an online IQ test
2) post results on /sci/
Ever thought of the colors that we can't see, it's like a color blindness, that we can't comprehend what it could look like.
>>8965773
Colors are a phenomenon produced within the brain, in response (usually) to the wavelengths of light detected on the retina. There's no such thing as a color we "can't" see, unless you're color blind.
>>8966007
I am! :D
>>8966015
Well, there you go.
Is criminal behaviour nature or nurture?
>>8965304
Both. Everything is both.
/thread
>>8965304
What is criminal behavoir?
Only way I could see anti-social behavoir being "nature" is being born with some kind of birth defect or immune disorder that causes the brain to not be able to function typically
>>8965304
nigger genes are genetic
Should the west be concerned about China's enthusiasm for further research in Eugenics and genetic engineering?
http://english.cctv.com/2016/09/22/VIDEDXOB363TdeM7MIPZqIAB160922.shtml
it doesn't matter how much engineering they do, they'll never be able to give asians any sort of humanity/sympathy/empathy
>>8965275
Fukn auto-correct
Stephen Hawking--
"Unless there is a totalitarian world order, someone, somewhere, will build an improved human."
Are there anons here who don't think we will colonize space? Honestly I can't imagine us not doing it within the next 200 years. The technology to make moon bases and rotating space habitats exist today and we are going to need a place to put our growing population. Also there is pretty much no known way for humans to make ourselves go fully extinct so it is going to happen eventually.
>>8964499
>Are there anons here who don't think we will colonize space?
Right here. I won't happen for several reasons:
>Incredibly hard to ship resources to and from
>Incredibly expensive to ship resources to and from
>High investment, with no return
No one is going to seriously fund something that's nothing but a big hole. The money will run out eventually.
>>8964503
>being this uneducated
Resources exist in space, everything found on earth can be found in space
anything organic can be grown
the returns would be the exact same as the returns colonies did in ages past, Space has lots of easy to access precious metals and rare earth elements, the nations building those mining colonies will love to have both
http://www.asterank.com/
there's a decent enough map of what can be grabbed here and now
and while you might bark that space gold would crash the market, Remember that you can send a small bit at a time to maintain value, like the good ole diamond cartel does
>>8964529
>Resources exist in space,
>He fell for the space mining meme
Nice anon, nice. FYI real life isn't sci-fi.
>anything organic can be grown
Yeah with fertilizer and water. Where are you going to get those from?
>the returns would be the exact same as the returns colonies did in ages past
No they wouldn't. For starters there are no current space mining operations (some billionaires are putting together to try and make one, but the technology isn't there). Further, you wouldn't be competitive. You would have to sell any resources you mined in spaces for more than the equivalent mass of the same resources mined on earth.
http://inference-review.com/article/fukugen
Anyone has some insight into this? I remember when it made a fuss the first time it came out in 2012, but it looks like people still can't understand it well enough to verify it?
>>8962526
>Anyone has some insight into this?
it's still not understood enough to be peer reviewed, so the abc conjecture is for all intensive purposes still unproven
>>8962533
>For all intensive purposes
For all intents and purposes.
>>8962526
>he still can't grasp IUT