Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 450. page

warding off butt-predators

>>8974648
curb overpopulation[citation needed]

>>8974648
the great question of our time OP

>>8974514
Look into the anxiety epidemic in America. You'll shit your pants.

>>8974528
Also known as the "I don't have enough money to live on" epidemic

>>8974528
Also known as the tumblr epidemic

>>8974501
Still no good way to modify genomes. CRISPR was recently found to introduce a number of mutations.

>>8974501
I think Thailand is in on the action. It's $9000 to pick the gender.

>>8974501
working on it lad, the tech is still very very new
give it a few years while we work out the kinks
would probably be bad to fuck something like this up

>>8974308
>Where do I start If I want to study a engineering?
Suck another man's cock.

>>8974308
>Currently working at a construction company

>I don't know anything but arithmetic.

>Where do I start If I want to study a engineering?

shit nigga, you are already 90% of the way there. just start community college classes and transfer to a 4 year.

>>8974308

So you want to be an engineer, answer these two questions:
>can you count past seven?
>top or bottom?

Write out a program and find out.

File: 1494213280589.gif (3MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x360px

>>8973567
only if you allow for self referential statements.
Here is a nice proof that OP is a fag

[math]\text{Let }Q\text{ be given by:}[/math]
[eqn]Q : = \left(Q \implies A\right)[/eqn][math]\text{Where }A\text{ is defined as the statement; } A := \text{OP is a fag}[/math]
[math]\text{Suppose } Q \text{ is false, then the implication given above holds.}[/math]
[math]\text{But this in turn must mean that }Q \text{ is true}[/math]
[math]\text{We resolve this contradiction by saying that }Q \text{ is not false, meaning } Q \text{ is true.} [/math]
[math]\text{But this must mean that }A \text{ is true!}[/math]
[math]\text{Therefore, OP is a fag.} \quad \blacksquare [/math]

File: ooooahh.jpg (50KB, 599x563px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 599x563px

>>8973567
Neither have EVIDENCE.

So neither are valid. If they were it would be proof by assertion and a circular argument fallacy.

And thats the last time i want to see this philosocrap on my /sci/.

>>>/pol/

Is it Thursday already?

The methodology used to date things is based on principles, axioms, "common sense", etc. I don't think the handful of people who claim to actually do the procedure and can verify this claim even bother to go through it half the time. They just put an sanctioned number on it and call it a day.

>>8973450
This guy looks like a hobo. Always cracks me up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

So according to that post humans are part of the K selection strategy, which means we focus on fewer offspring that are strong and likely to make it to adulthood if I followed that correctly.

But how does that explain wanted to have sex with someone who is not fit?

Is it that a lot of people these days are unhealthy so we familiarise with that and forget the ideal healthy mate?

Or is it just that we can get aroused by most things human so we can fuck anything and continue the human race?

On another note that same could be said for homosexuals, how is that part of Darwinism?

(Just want to stress I got nothing against homosexuality, I'm just interested on a scientific stand point)

>op is a faggot

>>8973075
Those are my favourite textbooks. They don't waste my time with trifles.

>tfw to stupid to find the trivial proof

no difference since no advances have been made in mathematics since newton

>>8973058
Not true. Standard tools today might not have been standard back then, group theory for example and perhaps contour integration.

>>8973061
But within the confines of course material for multivariable calculus, intro statistics (except for the obvious computational advancements), and intro differential equations for engineers, has there been a change?

Our eyes don't exist

cool fidget spinners

>>8972785
Bullshit, we have seen antimatter on earth. Like literally seen it:
https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/12/first-observation-of-antimatters-spectrum-looks-like-regular-matter/

It took lasers and some really sensistive photodetectors, but yeah, we can fucking see it

>>8966875
The only fair wage: what they're worth on the market.

>>8966882
this

>>8966882
Boo capitalist shitheads.

File: Untitled.png (760KB, 736x1290px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 736x1290px

I made this.

File: 1494539957114.png (780KB, 937x912px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 937x912px

>>8960759
That explanation made it way more harder to understand.

>>8961110
I will never know why this image never ceases to make me laugh

>>8978130
Whites are becoming the minority, and if everyone actually was white, we'd still find reasons to hate each other.

File: craniofacial trait distance.png (54KB, 400x398px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 400x398px

A related graphic I have saved: What we see is that morphological distance is nowhere near as great, or even consistent, as genetic distance.

That is to say, ancestry is not immediately obvious by gauging the "average" facial features. And shared morphology (appearance) does not necessitate shared ancestry, even for ethnicity-wide averages.

Intra-European diversity is extremely high, with the distance between Icelanders and Greeks being nearly as high as that between Danes and Congolese!

>Pigmentation is not hereditary
And we all came from Africa too.

>>8976481
Because they can't handle being responsible for their own lives

>>8976481
Hmmm, I would like to to blame them for more things...

>>8976481
Blaming men does nothing. Recognizing that social biases have existed and continue to exist that subtly push women away from wanting to do computer science, engineering, and physics and into life sciences or social sciences is important.
Similarly, there is a social stigma against men doing many performance arts, teaching, and child care.