Archived threads in /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests - 1340. page

File: jYVMSjJ.gif (2MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x400px

Also this

File: yIJL2HH.webm (238KB, 620x418px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 620x418px

Also

>>123246
This cat is Lil' Bub.

Well, Vampire: the Masquerade is an rpg franchise, there are already novels. I can't vouch for the quality, but these people can:
https://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?711176-How-good-are-the-Vampire-the-Masquerade-Novels

There was also a tv show, Kindred the embraced. Can't comment on that one either.

If you like Vampire: the Masquerade, then your first stop should be ANNE RICE. She has written an extensive alt-history of Vampires, and it is really good. It's some of the best Vampire fiction out there. Anne Rice. Interview with a Vampire is your stsrting point, it has been filmed as well.

When you're done with Anne Rice, read Dracula.

>>123253
Awesome I'll check those out

>>123253
>There was also a tv show, Kindred the embraced. Can't comment on that one either.
it was complete garbage

I think you should post this to the science board

File: Untitled.png (13KB, 907x664px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 907x664px

well, of course you can calculate everything. knowing nothing about eve or space combant... do you have exact positional data (coordinates) available and is accelleration not modelled in game? if you can switch from full stop to full speed in an instant, the calculation is trivial. if everything gradually accellerates it becomes extremely difficult to time everything.

also, i don't really understand the tactical advantage of jumping a bomb perpendicular to its trajectory (aka "sideways"). Wouldn't it make more sense (and be much easier) to jump bombs forward (ie fire them from behind the destroyer and then once they pass the destroyer jump them forward towards the enemy)? again, i no clue about eve.

anyway. let's run the numbers for conventional bombs given constant speeds and to a precision of 100ms (no clue what eve's servers can handle). at 0s the CD and the projectile meet and the jump drive engages. Instantly (still at 0s) we arrive 100km forward. At +0.1s you want the bombs to detonate. that means bombs conventional bombs are fired at -11.9s, so they must be fired at a distance of 29.75km from the meeting point (11.9*2.5).
the 6km radius in the jump drive should cover it anyway, but let's be optimal: on the CD you'd want to use the lower speed, since there is less variablity (only +/- 6m/s instead of +/- 90m/s). due to the spool up time you'd have to engage the jump drive at -5.76s. with an average speed of 466m/s that's around 2.68km from the meeting point.

should be easy to adapt for other bombs. note: you don't want to be *that* precise, since the bomb would impact the CD. use the 6km radius.

>>123278
Awesome thank you for the help! To answer your questions as far as I know there aren't coordinates. The game itself may generate or log that kind of data, but it's not something I can see as a player. Acceleration is not instant, but in the case of a ship like the command destroyer it takes a very short time to reach full speed. Maybe 1s, I suspect a little less. There's no advantage to launching the bomb perpendicularly, that's just how I drew it. If its easier to launch from behind then that's what I'll do.

As far as advantages, I'm not sure there are any other than novelty. I've never even heard of anyone trying this. Both ships can fit cloaking devices as well (though only the bomber can use a "covert ops cloak" and warp around, while still cloaked, to celestial objects or to saved points on"the grid" - i.e. a term for the area of engagement or "normal" space a player is in), so it would be possible to sneak around or lay in wait for someome. The bombs are especially effective against ships flying in tight formation, which frequently happens in sieges of structures or pitched battles between heavier classes of ships.

someone must have it

File: SUCC.png (284KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1024x1024px

>>123182

Is this enough?

>>123172
>Is it possible to watch my own downloaded videos like anime on it?
I'm a bit curious about this as well.

well, it wouldn't make your anime VR, if that's what you're asking. however, i'm sure there's a theater view application available or something that would set your view in a room and display your videos on a virtual screen.

>>123214
ah, virtual desktop! you can just play your vids from there!

File: star gold.png (1000KB, 6000x6000px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 6000x6000px

>>123098

File: screen-shot-2012-10-07-at-12-39-56-pm.png (10KB, 481x186px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 481x186px

>>123156
Thats awesome! Thanks so much.


If I could be so bold, could I also get it in these colors? Thanks :)

File: no1.png (1004KB, 6000x6000px) Image search: [Google]

1004KB, 6000x6000px

>>123363
op returns!

>>123082
How old are you seriously, you got it already.

File: 1463454972893_.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

>>123082
Feel free to send me half the gold stars your teacher will give you for this magnificent proof

>>123259
Why would you even do that?

>>122995
without you even posting the next image i can already tell you it's hue/lightness alterations

File: emma-stone-featured-image.jpg (280KB, 2000x1334px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 2000x1334px

Here's the original.

It looks like the:
-skintone is whitened
-eye color changed from green to ice blue
-lips from pink to bold purple (I can't seem to get the color right)
-neck slimmed
-hair color grey/goldened
-eyeliner added

>>122998
>skintone
hue/simple lighting adjustment. can be done in a adjustment/mask layer

>eye color
same thing

>lips
instead of painting, try to mask/overlay and lower opacity, then adjust levels to blend

>neck slimmed
i could tell pretty much immediately they used a strong smudge/liquify, the edges are really rough

>hair color
same thing as the first, that color could be a black and white on color and 10% opacity or something very simple

>eyeliner
this is probably the hardest part to not look like shit. light brush/smudging will still do it pretty easily

>>122937
not to good. it made me ejaculate bees

>>122937
I have no idea what's going on since I don't play halo. Video seems alright, might entertain the target audience, you seem to use the same sound clips and voice and text-to-speech youtubers use. It's ok, I guess. because I know most just copy from each other.

But try to find something original, something unique from yourself, to identify and easily distinguish your videos from the others. Something to make it obvious we're watching a video from pleb.exe and not from any other random youtuber, since so many are the same. You can do it

>>122937
tolerable. about par for the course for what it is.

usually firsts are worse, so I gotta say, you're doing pretty good so far.

I have no particular reason to subscribe to you, because I don't play halo and you haven't brought anything particularly unique or outstanding to the table for me to watch it just for you the creator yet. But Its certainly passable, and I could see you one day growing into something I might sub to.

IDK how i can pay you guys, from other requests and/or amateurs, dunno.

it won't be online for a while anon, wait a few weeks

keep checking https://kissanime.to/Anime/Yu-Gi-Oh-The-Dark-Side-of-Dimensions

>>122867
>https://kissanime.to/Anime/Yu-Gi-Oh-The-Dark-Side-of-Dimensions
Hey, man, thank you for the link. I'm checking nyaa.se as well, is it a good source for this kind of stuff?

>>122856
You mean like a transparent .png?

>>122874
Transparent png is fine or another background color :P

>>122877
Ya, gimme a few

pls

>>122852
You could just enlarge the image
Select the different area's, blur them so that it removes the pixalation, and put them back together.

On my phone, so can't do it

>>122873
Thinking it over, redrawing might be just as much work, it's a really simple image

Help plz respond

I'm so lost .-.

>>122835
Had a similar problem on my old laptop. Turns out the hard drive was fried. I would check that. I can't remember how to do the hardware check, but I'm sure a simple google search can fix that.