>he/she plays a videogame for the story
>>>/lit/
You don't belong here
>he/she plays a videogame for the cinematic experience
>>>/tv/
You don't belong here
>he/she plays a videogame for the romance options
>>>/r9k/
>>>/lgbt/
>>>/soc/
You don't belong here
>he/she plays a game for the anime waifus/husbandos
>>>/qa/
>>>/a/
>>>/d/
>>>/h/
>>>/y/
>>>/u/
>>>/cm/
>>>/c/
You don't belong here
>he/she plays a game for the gameplay
>>>/v/
>>>/vg/
>>>/vr/
You belong here
Mods sticky this thread.
Okay, what if I brought a game like FFX where all the previous FF gameplay mechanics were the exact same?
Would it not be reasonable to want to buy that for the story?
>>384270750
Turn-based rpgs/strategy games are not videogames, they are electronic tabletop games
>>>/tg/
>>384270951
I was just using that as an example though. I can say the same thing for hack n' slash games like God of War. Gameplay is entirely the same, story is different.
Surely nobody's gonna buy a sequel to a game just for the gameplay, even though the gameplay is entirely similar to the prequel.
>>384271326
You still play god of war for the gameplay do you not?
>over half of posts is OP
sage