Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 6144. page

I agree, I watched it yesterday and movie is at best bland as fuck, so fucking lowest common denominator.
I have feel they made it for people who never saw anime, and don't know what anime is.
And , I personally don't give a shit about anime for 15 years now but I would like to se some actual ecranization of some famous anime from childhood(just because) Akira, Battle Angel Galita or some such. But ,in all honesty, they should make it similar as they did Warcraft,
leave all "quasi deep" bullshit out of the door and just make visual spectacle.
I'll get shat upon for this statement but I honestly believe that Michael Bay or Guillermo Del Torro (even Wachowski sisters)would made an heck
of a better movie.

>>82329602
I don't know, I liked it. It was pretty faithful to the original movie.

when the title card "Ghost in the Shell" appeared, I thought
>hmm, actually the name itself is kind of a tough sell, I wonder if they will be able to convey the meaning to the audience during the course of the movie

First line of dialogue:
>hello mira
>we gave you a new body, a synthetic SHELL
>but your mind, your soul, your GHOST is still IN

Oh, OK.

Also Robocop (remake version, at that) > GiTS2017.

What was the moral of this story?

>>82329509
Be a woman

>>82329543
Social networks fuck your life, everyone can know what you did in your past, and make a lot harder to move on from a failed relationship.

>>82329543
women of every race creed and class are snakes and liars and you should never EVER trust one.

>>82329503
It was good, makes /tv/ mad for some reason

saged

>it's a catch a fly episode

>>82329157
it will be the first film to actually transcend kino and create a new category of its own

File: ooo.jpg (39KB, 296x296px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 296x296px

>>82329157
>discussing the biggest kino of the 2010's decade

Prometheus thread?

>>82329157
>kino of the decade
>a remake

pick one

I don't get it.
Why is that screenshot not in color?

File: a2566708491_10.jpg (68KB, 727x709px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 727x709px

>>82328828

russ meyer thread?

File: quote-i-always-had-a-tremendous-interest-in-big-tits-russ-meyer-106-91-25.jpg (47KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 850x400px

>>82328898
yes

This fat fuck, I've read fanfictions that put more thought and effort into his own universe than he has, written twice as fast too.

>>82330394
Why wasn't there an appendix about crop rotation in Hobbiton?

Do they ever actually lay out anyone's tax plan in ASOIAF? The most I remember is just general references to raising/lowering taxes.

>>82328498
'edge of tomorrow' isn't bad, worth a watch.

>>82328498
I have the strangest case of deja vu.

no catched for you

>>82328463
>love Ralph and want to be salty about Tony murdering him
>can't because of the shit with Tracee

God dammit Ralphie why

Why did Ralph treat her like shit?

SHE WAS A HOOAAA

>>82328446
>co worker tells me black mirror is genius and REALLY fucked up
>watch the first episode
>retardedly on the nose commentary about social media

Idk why I even try anymore

>>82328446
technology and humans are bad.

>>82328446
for the next thread, do a "in this thread we write the next season of Black Mirror" thing.

Get a band aid?
I don't know what this is

>>82328319
I would jerk off on dead girls grave screaming

File: 13reasonswhy-hplg.jpg (42KB, 740x506px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 740x506px

>>82328319
Listen to the tapes, Clay

Finn Wolfhard with a moustache plays Richie

>>82328260
>vin diesel vs pennywise
K I N O

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-03 at 1.59.51 AM.png (2MB, 1158x1156px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1158x1156px

>>82329138
yisssssss

>>82328243
yeah but she's kind of ugly now

>>82328243
That chick is kinda hot and these movies had some good looking ppl, but the vampire lore is shit-tier.

>>82328243
Yup. If only she had more screen time.

>>82330059
watch it and find out..

>>82330059
Kino, and many plebs were filtered.

>>82330059

What do you mean missed it? Do people seriously still watch shows as they air on television complete with five or six commercial breaks?

>>82328187
because it is.

it's the most intellectually lazy book she writes.

And despite being one of the longest books, it barely advances the plot.

who cares? it's for children you manchild

File: mac daddy rank.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

You might call this a dull franchise, but I call this a serious ground for discussion of this heavily flawed series of so-called "literature". But what else could you expect from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: sad taranchula.jpg (1005KB, 1252x1344px) Image search: [Google]

1005KB, 1252x1344px

>54 years old
>no wife
>no kids

What went wrong?

There was an old interview of Tarantino on The Tonight Show where he got fucking wasted and was completely wiggered out, but it's been scrubbed off the fucking internet. Anyone know where I can get it? All I can find is old mentions of it on forums.

https://archive.is/PSdL1

>>82328202
Are you talking about when he was filming Jackie Brown and he was trying to act like he was some kind of method writer? He was dressed like Samuel L Jackson's character from that movie and kept talking like him.