>a perpetual machine is impossible due to the first law of thermodynamics
Dude, how retarded is that?
The first law is simply "You can't", and people who defend that idea say it as if God himself that wrote that down.
I'm not saying that a perpetual machine already exists or that it's going to good enough to be worth the space it uses while generating energy(and it will eventually need maintenance too), but denying the possibility of a perpetual machine ever existing because of that is just dumb to me.
>>9092462
>>a perpetual machine is impossible due to the first law of thermodynamics
>Dude, how retarded is that?
>The first law is simply "You can't", and people who defend that idea say it as if God himself that wrote that down.
>I'm not saying that a perpetual machine already exists or that it's going to good enough to be worth the space it uses while generating energy(and it will eventually need maintenance too), but denying the possibility of a perpetual machine ever existing because of that is just dumb to me.
t. someone who's taken at most high school level physics
please read a book before posting again
Could you actually explain why you think it's dumb rather than just saying it is dumb because it's dumb?
>>9092520
Because I don't see the sense in people who deny the possibility by saying "the first thermodynamics law say it's impossible, therefore it is", when we don't even really know how gravity even exists.
It's pretty much guaranteed that we're in a simulation. It's quite obvious that when you die, you'll wake up in the real world as your real life self (which is probably bound to be better than your current life considering you're browsing 4chan). So why haven't you killed yourself yet?
bro, i dont know whrere you heard that but its totally false
>we're in a simulation
true, but there is no real life for you to wake up into. We exist only within the simulation
>>9097113
>It's pretty much guaranteed that we're in a simulation
Based on what?
I believe that all scientifically minded individuals should believe in extraterrestrial life. But if you ever come into contact with one then you should know how to establish a foundation for communication and peaceful conduct.
How would you go about doing this.
Point to myself and say my name.
Point to myself and another person and say "human".
>>9096440
Point to OP and say "faggot"
>>9096342
Take out my shittiest camera and take one or two unfocused images then tell no one about it until a few years.
So is everyone on this board an INTP autist?
>>9096338
Whats the difference between whats described in that picture and INTJs?
>>9096338
Depresion, inability to make simple thing over search high level answers, long reflexive moments, poor social skills.
Looks like INTP
>>9096346
INTJ get things done.
Makes profit avoid research
Is a math degree really a waste of time?
I just want to make lots of money at a comfy desk job
Desk jobs are for dumb normies.
>>9095700
Major in something for pre-law or accounting
What exactly is the point of Complex Analysis?
I've got to take it for my MS and I just don't see the fucking point. I'm already doing Reals and I want to study Statistics/Probability
Can somebody redpill me on Complex?
>>9094419
I haven't studied it in depth but if you're an engineer you might use it all the time. Wave mechanics is absolutely full of it, and by extension so is quantum mechanics if that's your thing. Pretty sure anything that involves any kind of signal (electronics, sound processing, vibrations) makes use of complex functions.
>>9094419
complex numbers do not behave as nicely as real numbers so there is a lot and I mean A LOT of crazy shit going on around the complex plane.
You should learn it simply as a hobby. What justification do you need to learn complex analysis man?
>>9094419
Walter Rudin: real and complex analysis is the book you mi=ust read.
The point of complex analysis is to realize that contrary to what happens with real defined functions, when a map form comple numbers to complex numbers has a derivative (same definition as in the real case), then it has also a lot of surprising yet extremely interesting properties: Cauchy Formula, identity theorem, Rouché theorem about the localisation of its roots etc etc.
Complex analysis is a rigid but magical world.
John Banzhaf, a well-known activist professor of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, says experts disagree on the consequences of allowing people to engage in mock acts of rape with humanoid dolls, and lawmakers should vet this issue as soon as possible.
Saying there’s evidence rape sexbots may significantly increase the chance of rape to real women, the law should “no longer stand by and blindly ignore a major potential problem by doing nothing,” he said in an email to The College Fix.
Sexbots, especially those which can be programmed to act as if they are being raped, and those which act and appear to be young children, are already here and in use, Banzhaf said.
“The obvious first step would be to have hearings and do studies to determine just how serious the threat is, whether there are any real benefits to having sexbots programmed to simulate being raped, and then what if any new laws, regulations, etc. might be appropriate,” he said.
Banzhaf is no stranger to successfully pushing for government regulation. He “helped drive cigarette commercials off the air” and was one of the masterminds behind lawsuits against the tobacco industry, his faculty bio states. More recently he used similar techniques to target the obesity epidemic. His legal activism course is also known as “Sue the Bastards,” according to one report.
Now he’s turned his critical legal eye to sexbots.
He said in a recent news release that the consequences of permitting the sale, distribution and use of sexbots to “perverts” and convicted or potential rapists should be reviewed.
>>9093895
>Saying there’s evidence rape sexbots may significantly increase the chance of rape to real women, the law should “no longer stand by and blindly ignore a major potential problem by doing nothing,” he said in an email to The College Fix.
yea because violent video games produce tons of murderers? He's blowing this out his ass for publicity
>>9093903
it has nothing to do with rape. realistic sexbots mean fewer kids, which goes against state interests.
>>9093913
no one who buys and uses a sex bot was going to have kids to begin with. It's also not the responsibility of the state to limit something based on a subjective "what if" statement
When I think depressive thoughts I feel a freezing sensation in my chest.
It's this spike of pain that I feel, ando I'm not getting any direct results when I Google it.
Heartbreak/loneliness thoughts
Stop being a faggot
>>9093579
Bump
>>9093579
Release of stress hormones I wager
MARS IS BACK ON EVERYBODY
>MARS IS BACK ON EVERYBODY
>>9088124
Well, good for him. Maybe he learned his lesson about why gold diggers are a bad idea but then again, odds are in a week he'll be with Tila Tequila or some shit.
>>9088124
>paypal billionaire
wut
>>9088154
>Lead on a gold digger at the prime of her sexual inclination towards him
>Get a refund when the goods get used
I think a guy as smart as that had it all laid out from the start
Just how bad is porn for the brain?
It's lethal
2 bad
>>9093806
Bad enough for you to mistake the extreme sadness you receive after getting so much dopamine, for depression
>Watch stupid leftie film Wall Street II (2010)
>About the 2008 crash and Bear Sterns
>Movie was actually trying very hard to be accurate
>See so many lectures on how great "alternative" energy is and how ebil oil is
>The main shill point was Laser Fusion technology
>Main character convinces chinks it's a great investment because they care about the next 100 years unlike the ebil Murifats
>Type it in wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_Inertial_Fusion_Energy
>"With the problem of ignition unsolved, the LIFE project was canceled in 2013."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
When will you green shills ever learn?
Only this can stop the Jews.
I think it's sad that you're so emotionally invested in politics that you legitimately dislike people who prefer to use a different energy source you want to
>>9092844
This was when oil was over $100 a barrel. Today it's half that, coal and natural gas are also record lows.
Hi /sci/, let's talk about iQ?
You guys seem really obsessed with IQ. It's really a powerful number, full of predictive power and I'm not here to challenge this notion. I'm here to challenge the notions that you guys have about high and low IQ and how to deal with the God damn number.
I see a lot of claims in this board about people with 140+ IQs or even people in the 160+ IQ, and I generally laugh. When I see those numbers used I know for a fact that I'm talking with:
1) Someone who does not know how much of a statistical anomaly those numbers are.
2) Someone who is narcissistic enough to not be able to see his(her) own limitations and actually(falsely) believes to be the next Einstein.
I'm not claiming that genius do not exist, I'm just saying that today it's much more likely to find a stupid person blind to his own limitations than to find an actual genius. The other point, about people in this board not understanding how high is 140 IQ will be illustrated below:
Most IQ classifications divide people into categories like "average" or "low average" or "gifted", they associate each category with an IQ range like (90 - 110). The fun fact is that most classifications don't even bother to create any category above 130+, since in the real world anything above 130 is very rare. It's crazy how so much people here think that they need to lie about having 180 IQ when in real life 130 already a really big number.
>>9096343
1/2 of a person out of 100 people have an 140+ iq
That isn't a statistical anatomy
>>9096343
Above 130 things start to fall apart. It's really fucky for kids since their brains can process concepts they can't emotionally process at the time, and they can be a bit obsessive over things. A lot of 130+ people end up being underachievers if they don't have the proper support for it. IQ also means jackshit after a point since if you are smart enough you can game them, since the questions follow a pattern, and they lack any sort of internal consistency due to different standards by different tests.
What's the big deal with this guy?
Can you explain it to a layman why he's so important?
Was he really that wicked smart?
He discovered the theory of relativity which states that the faster you go, the less time it takes to get places. time slips away at the speed of light. The speed of light is sort of the speed limit of the universe.
So the short answer is yes
>>9096207
Some people say it was more of his imagination at play opposed to smarts. It's debatable really.
Well uni is about to start so I wanted to make a thread to share study skills for STEM majors. One thing I'm definitely going to do different this semester is make a to do list. A friend told me it made him procrastinate a lot less.
I'm also interested. I'll be starting my master's after the summer break, and I truly do plan to not procrastinate, do my coursework in time, and start studying on time. But I've had those plans many times before and never kept them.
One thing that helps obviously is to not visit 4chan and other useless websites. I have to very consciously suppress the impulse to just type ctrl-T 4chan but I'm getting there.
I would respond to your question but I'm having an autistic fit over that image.
>>9095642
>not considering the orthogonal projections of a cylinder before talking
fucking pig.
[math]\int _{-\infty} ^{+\infty} e^{a x^2} dx=sqrt{\pi / a}
>>9093538
it's dangerous to go alone, take this
[/math]
>>9093576
[\math]\int e^{a x^2} dx
>>9093576
cant get it right :( [/math]\int e^x dx