Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 212. page

Frontent webdev though it's not really computer science.

>>9101809
Thanks bud.

>>9101800
Machine learning. Ridiculous pay for a bit of lingebra and stat. Demand for employees ever increasing with no end in sight. If that's not for you, bioinformatics is about to get pretty huge too.

>>9101735
>gene editing
you mean reproducing them and filtering the ones you don't like ?

You could crush a bug with your cock. Imagine that. Extinguishing the life of a being using your cock. All that power. Just a thought.

File: c.png (117KB, 1280x1036px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1280x1036px

>>9101740
No, I mean gene editing.

Is it easy to do?

>>9101443
>If I was frozen for 100 years and dethawed/rejuvenated by modern science
it's just like pressing the pause button in a videogame, but for reals. OK really there isn't enough data to answer this question because you haven't said shit about what the dethawing process, this thread is thus pointless.

\thread

>>9101443
Assume the body is a complex machine.
Without electrical signals your "soul" and all higher cognitive functions are frozen. This would mean you are exactly the same person once an electric shock and thaw has been applied because you are just pouring petrol (heat and energy) into a car that has been left in a garage...

What a sad day it is when a man can so quickly be encapsulated by a mathematical function...but such is the way of progress.

>>9101451
>OK really there isn't enough data to answer this question because you haven't said shit about what the dethawing process
All you need to know is you would be exactly like you would be before you were frozen(and whatever caused you to die in the first place would be cured)
Possibly through some highly advanced nanotech robots.

No magnetosphere, no atmosphere.

>>9101018
My dream :( it's- Dead....

>>9101020
>no magnetic field
cant we just build a couple of electromagnets orsomething on mars?

File: IMG_3531.jpg (46KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 630x630px

Work on conditioning your brain. Literally, you have to brainwash yourself into it; there's no other way. You choose how you do it. Meditation works for focus and will improve your reading/studying stamina. Become a brain athlete. Take Ritalin for a boost here and there.

>>9100827

You can't because your poor genes and low IQ prevent you from doing so. Sorry.

File: IMG_2866.jpg (245KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 960x1280px

>>9100827

Try masturbating after doing something productive, your brain will associate completing work with pleasure. After a while you'll receive the same stimulus (although much lesser) without the need for masturbation.

I reward myself with burgers.

>>9100809
Tsunamis, apparently

>>9100809
I know most of this board is indian, why not venture a guess?

File: 1498507358964.png (708KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

708KB, 640x640px

Does ppm stand for poos per meter?

>>9100103
you offset your earning power by a good 6-10 years or so (including having to pay back 200-300k in loans).
high demand for those cushy high paying positions
cutthroat environment of medical school
scheduling your life around your work instead of vice-versa
having essentially a pretty monotonous job, with little actual science involved
having to interact with normies

>>9100103
The downside is that nothing you listed is entirely true, most of it is far more complex and laden with catches than you think, and some is outright not a thing.

The first two issues:
>specialize in radiology
>have a private practice
No. Not unless you're independently wealthy, and in a very specific sort of area. You need referrals for patients insurance to cover it (which means being in some network, with many smaller primary care facilities around. Hospitals generally have their own radiology), you need to actually buy and maintain the equipment, you need to pay staff to do all the paperwork, arguing with insurance companies, interacting with patients, etc. Yet another expense. Many private practices find it financially infeasible for that reason alone, you can't do it all yourself, and staff is expensive.

>save lives
That's not a thing with radiology. You're usually just the one telling them how they're fucked up or unremarkable.

>make 500k a year
Nah. Not if you're on salary, and not if you practice privately. And all the loans. Again, leading back to being independently wealthy. At which point, who cares about your salary? You don't need it. You might not be just playing and filling your time, but you certainly don't need it. Do you know the cost of a minimal CT scanner alone?

By the jimminy geez anon, I don't know where people get this stuff. It's mechanically impossible, a thing of dreams, illusion, and fantasy.

>>9100103
>One of the highest suicide rates when broken down by profession (twice as likely to kill yourself when compared to the general population)
>High dependence on political lobbying, which means that technically your profession has no inherent value to it. Doctors keep high wages because of artificial market control and political lobbying, should anything go wrong you will end up earning as much as a Cuban doctor: 20 bucks a month.
>You attract gold diggers and other despicable people who want to use you. Very few professions have this quality, even "businessman" lacks it because a businessman could just be some guy about to declare bankruptcy, but everyone knows that (at least for now) doctors are always rich so gold diggers rush to be with you then cheat on you/kill you and then collect child support/life insurance.
>Stupid people have your number and can call you all the time.
>You have pharmaceutic companies on your back pressuring to illegally promote their new drugs despite their lack of research. If you decline to cooperate with their market plan then they will literally use their industry connections to destroy your career, so you are forced to be a bad person to be a doctor.
>malpractice lawsuits

>>9099985
What else is at right angles to the other three dimensions?

>>9099988
are you saying time is?

>>9099985
because you look at relativity with time as the 4th dimension

that is to say 3 spatial dimensions with time being your 4th

if you know about inner products then the minkowski metric is what you use for a lot of inner products in physics

>When your mom is such a slut they make a documentary about her pussy

>>9099092
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>9099130
okay I laughed

File: plato-and-mathematics-9-638.jpg (88KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 638x479px

>>9098998
>http://the-american-catholic.com/2012/08/16/lincoln-and-euclid/
>Lincoln wrote
>>In the course of my law reading I constantly came upon the word “demonstrate”. I thought at first that I understood its meaning, but soon became satisfied that I did not. I said to myself, What do I do when I demonstrate more than when I reason or prove? How does demonstration differ from any other proof? I consulted Webster’s Dictionary. They told of ‘certain proof,’ ‘proof beyond the possibility of doubt’; but I could form no idea of what sort of proof that was. I thought a great many things were proved beyond the possibility of doubt, without recourse to any such extraordinary process of reasoning as I understood demonstration to be. I consulted all the dictionaries and books of reference I could find, but with no better results. You might as well have defined blue to a blind man.
>>At last I said,- Lincoln, you never can make a lawyer if you do not understand what demonstrate means; and I left my situation in Springfield, went home to my father’s house, and stayed there till I could give any proposition in the six books of Euclid at sight. I then found out what demonstrate means, and went back to my law studies.

>Lincoln law partner Billy Herndon relates how Lincoln studied Euclid’s Elements:
>>He studied and nearly mastered the Six-books of Euclid (geometry) since he was a member of Congress. He began a course of rigid mental discipline with the intent to improve his faculties, especially his powers of logic and language. Hence his fondness for Euclid, which he carried with him on the circuit till he could demonstrate with ease all the propositions in the six books; often studying far into the night, with a candle near his pillow, while his fellow-lawyers, half a dozen in a room, filled the air with interminable snoring.

>>9098998
read the fucking wikipedia page on informal logic, you obviously want rhetoric not higher logic.

>>9098998
>1000% retard picture
learn formal logic and then kill yourself for being a rhetoric fag

>>9098310
yep.
>tert-butyl-hydroperoxide
https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4135/is-there-any-substance-thats-a-4-4-4-on-the-nfpa-diamond

>>9098313
>tert-butyl-hydroperoxide
actually on doing more research just now, seems like there is some dispute over it, but there is at least one site that lists it as a 4-4-4. There are a couple of 4-3-4s and 4-3-3s though.

although any 4 is scary

https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/2692

>>9098313
>tert-butyl-hydroperoxide
>2.7 Mj/mol

Daaaaaaayum son.

>Climate Change
back to >>>/x/ please

>>9097732
>conspiracy theorist tells someone else to go to /x/

What's so special about 2C? Why is everyone so fired up about that number?
This is why:
https://youtu.be/Mc_4Z1oiXhY?t=17m45s

>>9097480
Commutative
>the (left) coset is...

>>9097480
This statement is correct and well known

Nonabelian obvsly

>>9097242
still gay, but not illegal

I would do butt stuff with juicy cocks anywhere in the universe i dont give a shit

how does he plan on drinking that

>>9096505

Moreover, the apparent centrifugal force (imagine a can on a rotating string with a marble inside it, the marble stays on the end of the can not tied to the string) acts by itself, without a centripetal force.

>>9096505
centripetal force is the force in an inertial coordinate system that causes an object to turn (ie the component of force orthogonal to motion).

centrifugal force is a fictitious force introduced by doing your physics in an non-inertial (read accelerating) reference frame. it is not a "reaction force", or whatever.

centripetal is the easier to understand of the two.

>>9096513
>centrifugal force is a fictitious force introduced by doing your physics in an non-inertial (read accelerating) reference frame. it is not a "reaction force", or whatever.

Why not? Centripetal points inward, and is a real force. There's a reaction for every force. So the fugal force is real.

I don't see how reference frame matters. Petal will always point inward. Fugal will always point outward. This is true even if I'm watching from an inertial reference frame.

Fugal is easier to understand, because physically unbound objects experience the fugal force.