Can you disprove the Mandela effect, /sci/? Supposedly people remember things differently to how history actually happened. How many of these trigger you?
>Nelson Mandela did not die in prison in 1980, he died in 2013
>Bernstein Bears, now Bernstain Bears
>"Tank Man" who stood up to tanks in 1989 on Tiananmen Square was not run over by a tank
>Forrest Gump "Life is like a box of chocolate", now "Life was like a box of chocolate"
>Interview with A Vampire, now Interview with The Vampire
>Snow White cartoon, "Mirror, mirror on the wall", now "Magic mirror on the wall"
>Star Wars "Luke, I am your father", now "No, I am your father"
>Mr. Roger's opening song "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood" now "It's a beautiful day in this neighborhood"
>Jaws "We're going to need a bigger boat" now "You're going to need a bigger boat"
>Looney Toons, now Looney Tunes
>Australia was south-east in the middle of the sea, now right next to Indonesia
>Japan was much further away from Koreas
>New Zealand was to the north-east of Australia, now south-east
>South America was below North America, now shifted to the east
>>8038835
Except for Berenstain Bears, none of these are a fucking thing, and Berenstain Bears is only a thing because "-stein" is a common name ending.
>>8038835
What the fuck are you even saying
I'm serious what the fuck
>>8038835
>people are stupid
>"ZOMG THE WORLD IS GLITCHED PARALLEL UNIVERSE"
I saw a video from GradeAunderA. He said he discovered this formula
>pic related.
What do you think ? Is he right ?
he is but it's seems to be a useless fucking formula
>>8035938
What the fuck does this formula do
>>8035938
>1 + 1 = 2/2 * 3 - 2 + 1 -1 +x -x
Why does the integral operation give the area under the curve of a function? For example, [math]f(x)=2x[/math] over the domain a to b is equal to [math]F(x)=x^2[/math] evaluated at [math]F(b) − F(a)[/math]. Why does the operation [math]\frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}[/math] give the area under the curve of a given function? This is not intuitive at all. If I take the sum of all the infinitesimally small rectangles underneath the curve of a function over the domain a to b, that is the same as performing the operation [math]\frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}[/math] on the function and evaluating the function at a and b and subtracting the former from the latter. Not one of my calculus professors have been able to explain this phenomenon without muh fundamental theorem of calculus but all that does is relate the derivative to the integral by saying the integral is defined as the antiderivative. It doesn't explain why it gives the area under the curve of a given function.
>>8034629
>all functions are polynomials
>>8034629
>hurr durr I can't into babby's first measure theory
PHYSICS FAGS BTFO
>>8035010
If I had to pick one webcomic to erase from existence XKCD would be it.
pennis and also dicke and bals
We gonna be immortal anons:
http://www.neuroscientistnews.com/research-news/first-gene-therapy-successful-against-human-aging
pic. related is the woman who injected herself with the gene therapy and extended her life by 20 years
it's real anons
are you happy that you'll be still alive in 2100 ?
All the billions that died..
>>8027313
Enjoy your cancer
I'm a high-school fag who loves calculus. I made a group on fb for only my specific class and I post vids there intuitively explaining the things we learn in class. My problem is they don't engage or care, and I want their grades to go up and appreciate the math. How can I make it more enjoyable and engaging? What keeps you guys in the mood when studying or in class?
I'd usually say find a project they actually want themself see accomplish. With your very standard topic, it might be hard to do much new.
>>8032394
ehe
fellow hs calcfag. I don't do shit in that class and I'm set to get a 3 on the BC AP next week.
Math is cool and all, but I'd rather be browsing the chans.
>>8032397
I made a general goal of scoring the highest class average on the final. I started a rivalry with another class to add fuel for them and an additional influence for them to care. When they see each other as a community, it helps, but the extent is only in class. On facebook, they give no fucks.
Favourite/recommended sci fi novel?
>>8009531
The book of the new Sun. The patricians at leet approve of it.
The Three-Body Problem by Liu Cixin
Dune
What is the
>most challenging major
>most respected major
in /sci/'s opinion?
Everything will be tallied to reach a final decision.
Computer Science
Computer Science
>>8035172
Physics
Physics
>>8035172
Pure/Theoretical Engineering
Pure/Theoretical Engineering
So what does /sci/ think of Subdermal magnet implants? I'm considering getting one in my finger but I'm not sure yet.
>>8032639
Well for one it allows you to feel/sense magnetic/electric fields.
>>8032609
Some guy who had this done to all his fingers recorded his experience in a blog. About a month and a half in his flesh had begun to reject the magnets and he had to have sizable chunks of his fingers removed because of infection.
This is so fucking cool. Technology is truly amazing. Definitely a thing people in the future will take for granted though. Littke shits.
Anyway, who even needs artists anymore now? We're getting to the point where we'll let AI create art.
https://deepart.io/
>>8018365
The intersection of the set of all art and the set of all AI-created stuff is [math]\emptyset[/math].
>>8018373
The Op image was created by an AI
Just like how calculators and computers replaced mathematicians, right?
How do you think Space Mining is going to start? I somehow doubt big businesses involvement because wouldnt the excavation of an asteroid made up entirely of precious metals going to devalue the ones we have back at home?
Using earths resources and dumping primitive energy sources like fossil fuel is 1000 times more efficient than going to outerspace and trying to drill the chickenshit resources out of floating rocks. which costs a ton more than its income
>>8024775
It will coincide with the start of the post-scarcity era
When we get to that level of automation and resource abundance, prices won't matter. It will be a socialist utopia
>>8024782
There are NEOs with trillions of dollars worth of precious metals
If there is a /sci/entific way to build a house, all of them would look the same.
>>8011789
>I don't know what skyscrapers are: The post
Why would you cover your lawn
>>8011789
hobbit holes
Is nuclear energy the most cost effective energy source?
>>8029497
Yes
Until we finally invent cold fusion, yes.
No, it's pretty expensive.
Compare to burning coal: either way, you use heat to boil water, and you use the steam to spin a turbine to crank a generator.
But with coal, you just feed a fire, and with nuclear, you need a complicated reactor.
With nuclear, you get a big up-front cost, and a big clean-up cost, then you go on taking care of the waste effectively forever. When people claim that nuclear's cost effective, usually they're looking at the operating costs, after the set-up cost has been obfuscated by subsidies and forgotten, and when everybody's pretending that the clean-up and waste management issues are just never going to have to be dealt with.
What's the best way to colonize Mars?
Are you also daydreaming the entire day of just building a world all for yourself on Mars?
Create a massive solar sheet in space next to Mars and use it to power a series of stations on the surface that convert the current atmosphere to Earth-like atmosphere.
redirect the orbit of an icy dwarf planet and collide it with mars and wait 2 million years
boom mini Earth
>>8021030
>wait 2 million years
Come on we're the masters of creating greenhouse gasses. How hard can it be to heat up the planet in a couple of hundreds or thousand years?
From newton's time, does the order of "greatest living mathematicians in the world" go
Newton
then Euler
then Gauss
then Riemann
Then who after that?
Ian Malcolm.
there is no order. each of them are necessary. this is like putting the order of vitality to the heart, lung, liver, kidney, marrow and brain. you need all of them or they all die.
>>8033436
I think he's asking for a chronology of mathematicians who were considered greatest at the time of their living.
That being said, if you honestly think Gauss was not the greatest who's ever lived, you're a stupid undergrad.