Nietzsche's philosophy is more than a bit fashy.
Why do people say it isn't?
>>8828289
it's not fascist, it's antiquarian
the parts of it that seem fascist are the parts that the fascists copied from the greeks and romans
never forget that socrates advocated genocide and dictatorship and aristotle was a racist
>>8828295
why is it whenever i post something that i think is interesting the thread dies
am i too stupid to know i'm stupid?
>>8828346
No this thread is...Es preddy gud
What's your favorite dialogue by the boy?
>Phaedo
>The Republic
>Euthyphro
>Crito
Still haven't read The Symposium which seems to be a common favorite.
>>8828222
>Protagoras
>Symposium
>certain parts of The Republic
As far as being entertaining to read, I most enjoy Symposium.
For profundity of ideas, Phaedo is by far the best, in my opinion
>>8828222
The Symposium is honestly really funny. I think the Phaedo is my favorite as well.
What are some books that will be remembered for the next 100 years guys?
The Qu'ran.
That is all.
>>8828131
Recent books or any kind of books?
Every book that will be over 100 years old and still remembered.
>be me
>Never read Carl Jung
>Know who dat is, but that's it
>Suddenly people all around me start talking about him
>'Bout how great he is
So where should I start, which book should I read first ?
>>8828050
Read Four Archetypes, his ideas about the collective unconscious are super important.
I've also noticed what feels like a Jungian revival, feels good lads.
>>8828050
Portable Jung
>inb4 everyone gives a different recommendation
all his books are so interesting its hard to say, maybe "memories, dreams and reflections" because its sort of a background that explains how he came to believe things
any good?
Yeah it's quite fun.
>>8828022
i like your taste in books. what else is fun? looking for less serious stuff like this - fuck hard with flashman.
it's as much good as bad and there's a lot of it
if you've got a penchant for esoterica and a sense of humor you will probably enjoy it some.
>>8828059
pynchon, if that even needs to be said. gravity's rainbow is basically a well written illuminatus
Will it be problematic if I start with Critique of Judgement?
>>8827973
>Will it be problematic if I start with Critique of Judgement?
Autists will say yes because he references his first critique here and there but otherwise nah
>>8827973
Start with Prolegomena. It makes it easier to approach the 3 big Critiques IMO.
Of course you can do whatever.
His work will not be remembered. It's shallow, unimaginative and speaks only to a small window of commercial trends in the 80s.
He'll be remembered until some other popular slob takes his place.
Is he still hiding after running away when Trump won?
>>8827964
Be careful not to cut yourself.
Anyone recommend a good place to start, if I'm interested in the works of Julius Evola? I tried asking on /pol/ but they basically just called him a homo.
Yeah, thanks, lads
Read the book that your picture is obviously referencing, you total faggot
>>8828711
I was wondering if Ride the Tiger is the best book to start with, or whether an earlier work would be better
Why the hell are all the bestsellers written by women/have women protagonists? And if they aren't,they are the 32nd sequel of a gritty detective story.
It's a fad, so what?
You can look up the best-sellers from the 20's and 30's and most of them you've never even heard of.
Selling a lot doesn't mean it's worth reading. It just means a lot of turds tossed a buck its way.
>>8827869
>Why the hell are all the bestsellers written by women/have women protagonists?
Because being a woman and/or writing a female protagonist gets you published easier.
Post your epic stacks, gentlemen.
Here's mine. Rate please.
>>8827856
Cancer/10
>>8827953
you're right, it is cancer. but since you didn't show yours it automatically means that your stacks are even worse. cancerpost/10
>>8827856
Fuck off.
Christmas is coming around; what will you be reading anon?
/Shakespeare/ here
>>8827824
Oblomov and The Magic Mountain.
>>8827824
Tolkien and the Elder Edda.
Just finished reading Hamlet. Then I will move on to Macbeth.
Making these is kinda fun desu
>>8827888
Shit, that's pretty accurate. I was disappointed in that book desu
Am I the only one who did not enjoy reading this?
Some of it was funny sure but mostly it was a chore to read and I hated the non-linearity of the storytelling.
but the non-linearity is genius with how it all comes together by the end
>>8827830
It wasn't worth it for me.
Always found it weird how polarising this book is. I'm the biggest pleb going, I find 90% of the books I read either too boring or too confusing, so on paper I should have hated Catch-22. Yet it's probably my favourite book.
I think if the book doesn't click by the time you reach Clevinger's trial then you're probably not going to enjoy it at all.
Why does lit hate this guy so much? I thought East of Eden was a great book.
>>8827798
>I thought East of Eden was a great book.
Then we must hate you too.
>>8827798
Because they're cynical and hip, and genuine human warmth isn't.
>>8827798
/lit/ doesn't hate Steinbeck.
After finishing Eden and finding out that most of the main characters based on Gnostic mythology, I really got interested in it. What's the best way to get into it and is it hard? I have almost no /lit/ knowledge and can read in English and German. Thanks.
Plato: Phaedo, Republic, Timaeus (of course you can read all of his works...)
New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha
Nag Hammadi Scriptures by Meyer
The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity
Plotinus: Enneads
Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius
>>8827876
That one book by Harold Bloom
John Lash is interesting
youtu.be/nSBcEkIwpSk
John Lamb Lash is a self-educated free-lance scholar and author who combines studies and experimental mysticism to teach directive mythology. He is a leading exponent of the power of myth to direct individual experience and drive historical events over the long term. On metahistory.org, he presents a radical revision of Gnosticism, with original commentaries on the Nag Hammadi codices
youtu.be/_fYJSEaei04