Is atheism a religion? Why not or why?
>>454061
If it isn't atheists should stop acting like it is.
>The bottom line is this: there is no such thing as a world of "phenomena," of perceptible forms, and behind it, an impenetrable, true reality: the essence. There is only one given reality, which is multidimensional; there is also a hierarchy of possible forms of human and superhuman experiences, in relation to which these various dimensions are progressively disclosed, until one is able to perceive directly the essential reality.
atheists c ucked by their left brain into believing that's all there ever is
>>454121
What makes you think only atheists think this? And how does this answer the question?
How religious were Ancient Romans? Was their devotion comparable to how devoted the Byzantines were to Christianity later on? Or was it just a background thing in the lives of Romans?
Pax deorum
>>454054
Religion for the Pagans was really a lot different than we would imagine it today.
most modern people have no appreciation what so ever for the pagan-Roman mindset or how they saw the world, they look at a few superficial things and build this asinine idea that the Romans and other pagans were somehow "less religious" when in reality it was just a whole different kind of fervor.
the Romans were incredibly superstitious, in their daily lives they prayed to all sorts of spirits, deities, and other entities for everything from the mundane to the most grand. they had a strong belief in magic and many codified magical formula (I have a copy of a Roman fortune telling manual myself) and they regularly made use of such charms, curses and spells to have their will done or for really anything.
"religion" for them was not some external other, it was intertwined with absolutely everything, even the state was a religious entity and all the trappings of legalism were bound up with mystical ideas and the gods.
if you read the 12 tables of Rome there is extensive mention of magic and witchcraft and what degree of magic is alright.
all in all it was pretty silly when you look back at stories like one farmer throwing a cow fetus at his neighbor all under the watch of magistrates to ensure the curse was legal.
Christianity represented a major shift away from superstition towards more rational thought.
Romans were obsessed with getting their rituals right and "collecting" patron deities so that the empire would be under the protection of all divinity.
What would the world be like if-
Mithraism became dominant instead of Christianity
Zoroastrianism became dominant instead of Islam
Assyrians prospered instead of Judaism
Pretty different, I think.
>>453946
>Assyrians prospered instead of Judaism
Jesus christ how horrifying
Probably pretty similar, since environmental determinism is more true than spiritual determinism
What does /his/ think of Vercingetorix?
Just one of the many people who were inferior to G.J. Caesar.
>>453942
so wait, was he french or basically irish?
wasnt all of france just what Ireland is now, but it all got pushed back?
>>453942
Fought a lost battle. He was alright.
How did a band of a hundred Spaniards singlehandedly bring a 60,000-strong empire to its knees? There is no precedent in history where such a small army conquered an empire against overwhelming, physical odds. Not even the 300 Spartans could come close to this feat.
Was it by the hand of god, as they wrote in their testimonies? What made the Conquistadors accomplish such an impossible feat?
>>452973
guns, germs, and steel :^)
Tribes outside of the Aztec empire helped out.
The natives thought that the Spaniards were angels or messengers of the Gods, so they didn't fight back too much. Also the Spaniards had much more advanced technology and their germs wiped out most of the population there.
>this was the guy the Britbongs sent to the Munich Agreement
How could they trust such an ugly man to secure "peace in our time"?
>>452969
Your mom didn't find him ugly.
>>452969
Look at his beady eyes
>>452969
The mustache and haircut is horrifying, but at the time it was probably fashionable. It's not like he has an ugly face, it's average.
How do I reconcile my desire to be a coffee drinking, physical and intellectual flaneuring sophisticate with no daily schedule, along with my STEMtard core, which requires habits and long hours to reach its potential?
AND I want to fit in 4chan, the gym, and lots of reading! And I'm only thinking about all this stuff because I recently graduated and only work for 15 hours per week in a minor job while living with my parents so I barely spend money. If I was working 9-5 then my aspiration to do anything would be CRUSHED
>>452824
Who is this semen demon?
Don't do STEM
>tfw pure humanities
>>452824
BY STOPPING YOUR FUTILE & ABSURD ATTEMPT AT IDENTIFYING YOURSELF WITH SOCIAL STEREOTYPES AND SUBSEQUENTLY ATTEMPTING TO ENACT THEM.
YOU ARE AN UNSELFAWARE AND UNSELFCONSCIOUS IDIOT.
Does anyone else feel kind of sad that they missed out on living through the 20th century? Sure most of us were born anywhere from 1980-2000, but that leaves another 80 years that hosted some of the most incredible events in human history.
>ywn witness the very end of the industrial revolution at the turn of the 19th century
>ywn attend Queen Victoria's funeral
>ywn fight in the Boer War
>ywn never invade China to put down the Boxer Rebellion
>ywn be a Russian infantryman at Port Arthur while your trench is smashed to pieces by Japanese artillery
>ywn be a passenger on the Titanic
>ywn witness Archduke Ferdinand's assassination
>ywn storm the cliffs of Gallipoli
>ywn die in a futile charge to take a German communications trench at the Somme
>ywn kill the Tsar and his family in the basement of his imperial residence
>ywn survive a dogfight against Jasta 11 and Baron von Ritchthofen
>ywn be a delegate at the Treaty of Versailles
>ywn attend Lenin's funeral and notice a mysterious mustached Georgian standing in the shadows behind his coffin
>ywn stroll down the Wilhelmstrasse at the height of the Weimar Republic's cultural hegemony
>ywn witness Lindbergh's historic landing in Paris after his record-breaking transatlantic flight
>ywn get into a streetfight with communists and NSDAP brownshirts
>ywn kill yourself after you lose it all in the stock market crash of 1929
>ywn travel across the United States during the height of the great depression
>ywn be a victim of Stalin's purges
>ywn attend the '36 Olympics in Berlin
>ywn be the first German soldier across the Polish border
>ywn be a French brigadier-general who kills himself after realising a Panzer corps has advanced 80 kilometres in the past 24 hours
>ywn defend Britain from waves of Bf109s and Stukas
>ywn be a midshipman aboard the USS Arizona as a squadron of Zero fighters make a bombing run over your station
>ywn advance across North Africa to your target in Alexandria after routing the Commonwealth forces
I ran out of character space and that was only 1942
I just want to go back lads
Kind of yes.
There's literally nothing of importance happening in this millennium beside the rise of terrorism.
1900s were absolute shit no matter how you look at it.
>collapse of the old world order
>emergence of the USSR
>emergence of Nazi Germany
>two bloodiest conflicts in human history
>generally, tons and tons of genocides and wars everywhere
>feminism, marxism going mainstream
>Middle East fucked beyond recognition
>Eastern Europe fucked beyond recognition
Sure, we made technological progress and now have internet, airplanes and dick pills, but is the rest of it any good?
Reminder that Robespierre did nothing wrong
Danton was a mistake.
Also he cared too much about countering atheism. The main issue of the revolution was not the virtues and lack thereof of the people, or the english and counterrevolutionnary plots, but the generalized corruption of the new and not so new elites.
>>451691
>dfw people save your OC
Chinese literally forces Chinese to cut thier hair just to show how superior the Manchu way was. They opresses the Chinese in the most horrible ways.
Why do modern Chinese still identify with Manchu culture?
>>450096
>Manchu
why shouldn't they, americans still identify with the british culture and the english language, bulgarians still identify with the bulgarian turkic people that enslaved them, hungarians aswell. the mentioned do not even stem from the same people or nation. chinese identifying with chinese dynasties is even more plausible.
>>450134
>enslaved
Since when is assimilation an enslavement? People throw away horseshit buzzwords like this around without thinking.
>>450134
>americans still identify with the british culture
but they don't
FUCKING NORMANS GET OUT OF MY KINGDOM
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
funny
>>449840
Meme thread?
We didn't have one in a while...
>>449875
-more liberal
-homosexual (if and when they are homosexual)
-monogamous (but prone to cheating; intelligent females are less monogamous)
-late sleepers (night owls)
-atheists
-classical music listeners
-prone to drinking and smoking
-losers
to which I want to ask /his/
are most scientists/mathematicians/philosophers/musicians throughout history like this?
>>447245
Fugg I forgot to add "according to this, intelligent people are more:" book at the beginning and thanks to Emperor Hirohito I can't delete this thread.
>>447245
No I would say that half are early rising, slightly ascetic, most maintain their sceptical impulse that drew them to heavy thinking and only a few believers of worth.
I guess they have to be "losers" because to shake off all the political influences of the time in order to see the value in the "western canon" is a task that can only be done in isolation with any type of pleasure, since it is so difficult to get on with people who oppose us.
>>447245
no
newton was a hardcore christian
he was also a loser tho so this might have truth to it
desu this is feel-good bullshit
Do humans have the right to create artificial life?
>have the right
Says who?
rights are taken, not granted
>>439698
I plan on doing so for graduate work if they allow me. I think I could create actual life that could interact within society. They will have their own rights.
Hello /his/. I'm going to dump a few pictures, mostly Japanese wood prints, related to the First Sino-Japanese War, which happened between 1894 and 1895 over the control of Korea. I find these wood prints very interesting because of the clash of the "traditional" art style and the modern war depicted.
Here's the wikipedia article, if you want to learn more about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Sino-Japanese_War
But first, a map of the action.
So I was searching to download this book I have in digital copy. It's called "The Survivor", a novel about a German soldier in ww2, kind of "the other side of the story". I can't find it, it's like someone doesn't want it to be read (and it's not obscure at all , you can see it published in physical format). So, what historical fact /knowledge do you think is derailed from us?
inb4 /pol/ , inb4 tinfoil hat
>>454786
>So I was searching to download this book I have in digital copy.
>I can't find it, it's like someone doesn't want it to be read (and it's not obscure at all , you can see it published in physical format).
Oh sweet summer child
>>454853
Could you be any more cryptic faggot?
>>454965
the understanding is not obfuscated