Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3532. page

I love his clothes but I´m too poor to afford them right now

>>1200188
NOR ROMAN

>>1200188

Retard.

>>1200131
Betrayed by various neighbors through-ought history because serbs are crazy and retarded.

>>1200142
The eternal chetnik?

>>1200131
Bump for my serbian crush

>>1199837
>Would it be better off?
After he would be killed in violent revolution, along with his nepotist buddies.

Now the question is whether great leaps forwards did more harm than another civil war would do.

File: 1464016798164.png (425KB, 3516x2264px)

425KB, 3516x2264px

>>1199837
yes. it's possivle it still would be authoritarian but as long as the cultural revolution and the great leap forward didn't happen they would be much better off

>great leap forward and cultural revolution don't happen
>mainland China has a hideous flag
Even trade off desu

nothing. nobody never met anybody of different race so they didn't give a shit about them.

>>1199818
Bullshit. Are you telling me gypsies aren't treated like crap in modern Europe still?

>>1199821
what?

>>1199776
>all philosophy is worthless
your mom is worthless

>>1199776
The way I see it, every person has "a philosophy", whether they can label it or reference earlier people with similar contentions. The study of philosophy becomes the academic classification of different parts of these world views and explanations (apologies?) so we can better understand one another and work within this larger set of parameters.

Study of philosophy should not necessarily change your world view, but rather help you understand better yourself and others. Maybe sometimes you'll read something, and think "hey, that's a really good idea", or "damn, why was I thinking this, it pans out so badly", and accordingly this will modify your overall outlook, and it's fine when it happens, but it shouldn't be the aim.

>>1199776
your conclusion is self defeating
would you have come up with that theory had you not read philosophy or at least gained some skills under the discipline of philosophy?

File: 800px-Map_of_Vietnam_1829.jpg (344KB, 800x1201px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 800x1201px

Most of Cambodia and Lao's today territory was part of Dai Viet Empire in the past . It's right for them to take those back anyway.

>>1199627
The Cambodian party would have had to not start a persecution campaign of ethnic Viets. This means they would have had to not start a persecution campaign of urban Cambodians, as this campaign necessarily extended to ethnic Viets.

The Cambodian partys' theory of revolution was based on mass extermination. This would have meant that a variant party in Cambodia would have needed to be in a place to take power. ie: That the Vietnamese had intervened yet earlier.

>>1199645
vietnam didn't care about viets in cambodia. they got mad when the khmers tried expanding into vietnamese territory

>Were both USSR and USA frightened of belligerently engaging with Jugoslavija given their conduct in WW2?

Predominantly this.

Julius Caesar wanted nothing to do with the Balkans. Genghis Khan, sick fuck that he was, gave the Balkans a very wide swerve.

You do not fuck with the Balkans

Especially a Balkans led by a narcissistic demigod like Tito.

If America went in, it would have made Vietnam or Korea look like a literal picnic. If USSR went in, the troops would pray for Stalingrad.

You can manipulate the Balkans (though that was impossible under Tito) but you can never fuck with them. Because they will kill you to death and not even think about it for a second.

Do not fuck with the Balkans.

>>1199564
spot the serb

>>1199564
You might capture and torture them, but you'll nearly die trying. Remember how good old Vlad used to kill muslims for fun?

gommunism is not for fags

>>1199450
"Pederasts" are not "homosexual pedophiles". Pedophiles are pedophiles, sexually attracted to prepubescent androgynous forms. Most scientists on the matter agree that for most pedophiles, gender isn't an issue, but that specific form.

Pederasts are men with homosexual inclination, but are not attracted to fully adult males. This is not semantics, but the literal, scholastic definition. And here's the thing, we can not now, nor can we ever, get to the bottom of the issue, ever hope to cure or fix the pedophile, if we keep conflating the issue. One thing is one thing, the other is another thing.

An ephebophile is not a pedophile. Ephebophiles are people with sexual interests generally excluding the adult female form, but to them, there needs to be more than the form of androgyny, i.e. some development of breasts and hips. So neither can we say "ephebophiles are pederasts".

So, the guy simply wasn't as knowledgeable or insightful as you seem to think he was.

>>1199540
>as you seem to think he was.
>implying

Well it would depend on your class in this classless society

Serf- Legally tied to a collective farm, food restriction if quotas aren't met. Later lightened to be allowed out with nothing in return for your grand fathers land being stolen by the state

Lower class- No say in mandatory state unions designed to manage you so you don't slack off. Lower pay, low listing on lists for luxury items or any product with a waiting period

Middle class- Little management so you can just pretend to do work all day and pretend to believe in communism, still no bargaining power

Prominent CP member- You and your children get full rights at cozy universities and after wards employment pushing papers

>>1199422
>>1199422
>How did working conditions in the USSR compare to those in the US?

Faster promotion. Lower volume of material goods. Higher job security. Better rentals.

>Did Russian workers have more rights and bargaining power?

Yes, but they degraded significantly after 1941. From the 1950s a widespread go slow was put in place.

>How did labor even work in the Soviet Union?

You got a job for a wage in exchange for your labour and the factory/trust/bank extracted surplus value from you. Unemployment/sickness/age benefits were supplied through factories.

>How socialist was it?

Not at all.

(Pirani, Strauss, Andrle, Fitzpatrick)

>>1199440
Another anon here, but i'll add to this

Another thing to consider is the unofficial side of things. Black market was a thing and it was huge and ever-present. If you had access to some goods - whether produce grown by yourself, stolen from the state or acquired through contacts and by utilising bribes - then selling them might have earned you enough to make life livable. This is also how some lowtier occupations enjoys a rather prestigious position in Soviet society - doormen, barmen, taxidrivers had contacts and had small, ev3ryday bribes coming at them. Farmers - really small scale, like growing stuff in their gardens - had actual vegies to eat and sell since the stores were mostly empty, storage workers could steal stuff from the state. Skilled craftsmen and worked sold their services besides their mandatory state job. Coaches would 'smuggle' stuff from the big cities to the provinces. Etc.

Official bargaining power was non-existant - labour unions were state institutions - but blackmarket was accepted and taken for granted which could increase your 'power' unofficially. Of course a door would never make to the cadre.

cute commie boyz

File: corneliu_zelea_codreanu_by_riversofblood-d8rufjd.jpg (107KB, 658x565px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 658x565px

>>1199311
REMOVE

File: Corneliu_Zelea_Codreanu_archive_Legionary_Movement_Romanian_Christian_Nationalists.jpg (553KB, 1147x621px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1147x621px

>>1199494
BOLSHEVIK

File: 1456031165994.png (4MB, 3664x3536px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3664x3536px

>>1199209
who gives a shit?
we've had this thread so many times and its always the same thing, if you really wanted to know what people think of it you could easily look up "hiroshima nagasaki nuke warcrime" on the archive and find out.

File: 1409453685503.jpg (124KB, 500x629px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x629px

Reminder that there are no rules in war. The single solitary objective any state-entity has during a war is doing anything and everything within their power to win that war in their favor using any means necessary and with as few casualties on their own side as possible, yes, even if that means using nukes.

File: dresden kfc.jpg (259KB, 795x820px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 795x820px

>>1199227
bbut that's mean :(

I doubt any one enlightened or even under the illusion of being so would be content to work the fields or a 9-5 job

>>1199204
"opium of the masses" doesn't mean it's like a drug clouding their mind, it means it's like a painkiller assuging their suffering.

Is this an inherently bad thing that must be removed? No.

the masses must be harnessed, like a brute beneath the yoke

>>1199149
wealth brought by the industrial revolution led to decadence and a lack of incentive to participate in community activities like church

>>1199149
Nothing, it looks like a pretty well-constructed building to me

I agree, the building looks to be in excellent condition and has tasteful architecture. 9/10

Sounds like too much fun. We just argue about Jesus and race wars here

King Tigers were nice. Too bad that they had a shit ton of technical problems.

So, would the KT be able to penetrate the IS3 reliably?

Chesty Puller, the most decorated U.S. Marine in history

>>1198639
I think that was the badass from we were soldiers

>>1198798
What are you implying? That you interpreted the memetext confusing a male name for a female name is actually an attempt to degrade the physical capabilities of women in comparison to men, as a subject of the joke? Are you then implying that you yourself instantly consider the difference between a male and a female to be that the male is physically superior? That's pretty sexist, anon.