This is my area of specialty. I will answer any questions you have. I'll probably post some excerpts from codices/source illustrations while I explain relevant stuff.
I'm not just gonna dump info, but I will explain you ask me to to the best of my abilities, which is probably better than most people as this is what I did my graduate thesis on; specifically the cholula massacre (pictured), but I have a very good understand of the socio-politics that went into the events that transpired. That said, ask away! This is a woefully misunderstood area of history, and perhaps one of the most momentous in history.
>>1207237
I'm a retard who's interested in Mesoamerica (and studied pre-Columbian North America, as a Mohawk Tribe member), and I only know about the Aztec conquest and the stuff from M2TW.
So, after the Aztecs, how did the Spaniards subjugate the other cities, the ones that allied with the Spanish, the farther away ones, especially the Tarascans, whom it seems, as an AH writer, could've united Mexico following an Aztec collapse in the absence of European contact. Was it more or the same, did they do it through diplomacy as well, did they encounter any organized resistance, and how long did the whole thing take?
>>1207237
how important was Spanish Calvary in the conquest of mexico?
>>1207237
I realize I should probably explain the picture, it is a Tlaxcalan account of the Massacre at Cholula (I have a UN hearing next year to determine if this should be classified as a genocide or not, I am of the opinion it was, with reasons I will explain).
Basically, when Cortés had secured the cooperation of Tlaxcala, Tenochtitlan's rival altepetl (like a city-state but closer to the Sumerian version than the Greek type, having different relatively important differences from each other and each having their own identity rather than seeing themselves as all being Nahua), they stopped at Cholula on the way to Tenochtitlan (thereby forcing Cortes to stay with them) as they saw the support of Caxtilan (the nahua saw Castile as just another altepetl from far away) as the ally they needed to tip the balance of regional hegemony out of the Aztecs' favor. Cholula was a vassal/ally altepetl to Tenochtitlan, so the Tlaxcalans wisely decided to take the city before moving further, lest they have an enemy city at their backs. They blockaded the city, and rather than wait for a long protracted siege, the Tlaxcalans stormed the city, killing every man they could find. Not to be left out, the Spaniards followed suit. The tlaxcalans, however, did what the Spanish would *not* do, which was to round up the women and children in the sacred ball court and set them on fire. Around 30,000 lived were lost in total.
Why does China suck at war?
>>1207032
>Why does China suck at war?
yeah burger, that's the right way to go. just piss'em off.
>>1207048
Is that CIA?
>>1207032
>muh art of war
How did pants become associated with masculinity and skirts associated with femininity?
easy access
>implying you need pants to be a man
Barbarian shits please leave
>>1206827
t. scotsman trying to disguise himself as a roman
I have theological questions
So Satan and God didn't get along so he sent Satan to hell right? But now Satan runs the place right?
My question is, if Satan's original issue was defying God and he was cast down for this... why would Satan keep hell to God's specifications? Why not compete with God's market of heaven and turn hell into a fun park? I mean, you don't like the guy you aren't going to walk his dog for him, you know?
Does this mean Satan, by running hell the way God intends, is sucking up to God, trying to make it back into heaven? Doesn't this mean Satan has some good in his heart? Does this not detract from the badness of hell?
And what of the punishment? If an eye for an eye is used then why would anyone fear hell? Being raped once for a single rape you committed and then being done with your punishment is honestly not that intimidating. But then, why is an eternity of hell so talked about, when the bible says God does not punish more than the sins you commited? Then how do you explain things like the great flood?
>>1205766
This is a scholarly board based on reasonable discussion where we focus on humanities. If you want to talk about the paranormal, there's a board for that.
Basically, Satan despises humans because we are gods creation, and god loves us more than him. Satan then starts sinning because of the hatred and disobeying god, so God sent him to hell. Satan then uses hell in order to torture those who get out of the true path and all of that.
He just really hates us. A LOT.
>>1205816
The bible is a very common topic on this board
>>1205849
I have heard from theologists that Hell is punishment for Satan too, and this implies that he is not in control of hell at all and is suffering just like anyone else there. This would make his ability to tempt us to sin very inrealistic in my mind. I have also heard that hell does not punish anyone including Satan until judgement day comes.
Was it necessary to bomb Horoshima and Nagasaki, or it was just an useless act of cruelty? Also, how is it possible to appreciate people like Richard Feynman and at the same time see him as one of the worst criminals on earth?
>China said on Friday that Japan’s World War II violence is more worthy of remembrance than the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, ahead of a historic visit by U.S. President Barack Obama.
http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/china-says-nanjing-more-worthy-of-remembrance-than-hiroshima
I don't understand Chinese people sometimes. There's a time and place for everyting.
It probably wasn't necessary, but it was practical.
hiroshimmie sure. they were trying out a weapon that maybe wouldn't have worked. and revenge isn't the worst ideoology
nagasaki is imo an act of cruelty and 1 bomb was enough
>inb4 le 2 bombs weren't enough maymay
Has anyone ever been able to rebut Betrand Russell's "Marriage and Morals"? Even Einstein said the work was brilliant.
>Love as a relation between men and women was ruined by the desire to make sure of the legitimacy of children.
>The psychology of adultery has been falsified by conventional morals, which assume, in monogamous countries, that attraction to one person cannot coexist with a serious affection for another. Everybody knows that this is untrue.
>Even in civilised mankind faint traces of a monogamic instinct can sometimes be perceived.
>I should not hold it desirable that either a man or a woman should enter upon the serious business of a marriage intended to lead to children without having had previous sexual experience.
>Science enables us to realise our purposes, and if our purposes are evil, the result is disaster.
>Gluttony is regarded by the Catholic Church as one of the seven deadly sins, and those who practise it are placed by Dante in one of the deeper circles of hell; but it is a somewhat vague sin, since it is hard to say where a legitimate interest in food ceases and guilt begins to be incurred. Is it wicked to eat anything that is not nourishing? If so, with every salted almond we risk damnation.
Russell's father allowed Russell's mother to sleep with Russell's tutor, and Betrand Russell grew up to be a genius and win the Nobel Peace Prize.
>>1203570
Also, any rebuttal to his "Why I am not a Christian"?
> The whole conception of God is a conception derived from the ancient Oriental despotisms. It is a conception quite unworthy of free men. When you hear people in church debasing themselves and saying that they are miserable sinners, and all the rest of it, it seems contemptible and not worthy of self-respecting human beings.
>There are a great many ways in which, at the present moment, the church, by its insistence upon what it chooses to call morality, inflicts upon all sorts of people undeserved and unnecessary suffering. And of course, as we know, it is in its major part an opponent still of progress and improvement in all the ways that diminish suffering in the world, because it has chosen to label as morality a certain narrow set of rules of conduct which have nothing to do with human happiness; and when you say that this or that ought to be done because it would make for human happiness, they think that has nothing to do with the matter at all. "What has human happiness to do with morals? The object of morals is not to make people happy."
>>1203570
kukolding is truly the thinking man's fetish.
really makes you think....
>>1203571
if you want repressive moralism- Jesus was the very man. This is the man who equated lustful thoughts with adultery.
What battle or war in history would you have wanted to participate in?
None?
Stalingrad, just to see the plume of smoke that formed a cross over the city.
Or Verdun just to see the destruction.
Heraclea, as a war elephant
Why aren't classics taught in school anymore? Why are we not at the same as we teach our children the basics of biology and chemistry also teaching them to speak Latin? Why are we not at the same time giving them original Greek all the way to modern day Philosophical texts to get them to think of problems or the world in a different way?
I'm not claiming any students today are stupid or that the educational requirements are rigorous enough. I'm just asking why they also aren't taught Classics. I think they're extremely meaningful.
They should.
The best thing I ever did in my life was reading the Classics.
If there is anything that would improve the lives of people via education is this.
>>1193807
Because modernity offers an adequate canon?
>>1193845
Learning philosophy and reading classic literature would only enrich their education.
Any French people here? Can you guys elaborate on how history is taught in your country?
France is pretty unique in the fact that it was a monarchy for most of its history, yet was perhaps the only country in Europe that willingly overthrew their own monarch (most monarchies in Europe either faded into some symbolic asset or were ended after the world wars), so that has to be reflected in the way history is taught, right? Does the French education system conform to Whig histiography and depict the monarchs as evil tyrants who needed to be eventually be overthrown and then everything was peaches and cream? Are the great kings of France respected and honored? What about Napoleon? Do French public schools describe him as a hero of the revolution or literally Hitler? I do know for example that Napoleon III is very hated in France mostly because Victor Hugo and his "muh republic" hated his guts.
So my question is, in short, how much republicanism (and perhaps multi-culti bullshit as well) has colored the French view of their own history, and especially the non-Republican stages of French history.
>>1208692
Very very short answer: the mainstream national narrative is one of continuity from Vercingetorix to François Hollande. Plenty of variations exist, obviously, but still the 'official' story is that each period and regime put something new into the big edifice that was France. Even Louis Bonaparte is remembered for his important economic reforms and the way he reconstructed Paris and other major cities and all that.
If anything, the narrative is harsh on losers: Louis XVI, Robespierre, Charles X... all get a fairly cold treatment not because of their respective agenda but rather because they failed in what they were trying to achieve (if they have had such goals). I think it goes to show that what the French worship more than anything is grandeur nationale.
>>1208789
>Very very short answer: the mainstream national narrative is one of continuity from Vercingetorix to François Hollande.
Somehow I find this relieving. Part of me feared French attempts to erase their own history. Vercingetorix being included is pretty weird though, didn't the French traditionally consider Clovis their first king?
>France is only country to overthrow monarchy
You speak English but you don't even know English history, get back in your mine pleb
Anyone out there who knows the early history of Slovenians?
So far ive heard theories that they where Illyirian, Roman, Vandal, Sclaveni, Venetii etc
so, wich one of theese is true?
I tihnk the name itself may help being Slo-venia
Slo with slavic origin
and Venia celtic if im not mistaken.
Does anyone know for sure?
>>1208481
Slovenians are descended from Slavs who migrated into the Balkans during the dark ages
The name is from Proto-Slavic *slověninъ, which basically meant 'people who can speak', as opposed to the unintelligble foreigners, *němьcь
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/slov%C4%9Bnin%D1%8A
>>1208495
Funny thing, we still to this day call germans "Nemci", wich means "mutes"
>>1208481
HOL UP
*smacks potica*
YOU BE SAYING
*evades taxes*
SO HOL UP
*builds house without a license*
YOU SAYING
*builds kozolc*
WE WUZ HYPERBOREA N SHIEEEET
Rate the following values according to their importance in a given society:
>diversity
>education
>equality
>homogeneity
>individualism
>participation
>peace (internal)
>peace (external)
>prosperity (economic)
>spirituality
>technological advancement
Feel free to comment and elaborate. Try not to add values to the list. Bonus points for historical examples/demonstrations.
>>1208408
>diversity
Daily reminder that egalitarians can't actually believe in diversity.
>>1208408
diversity
participation
equality
education
technological advancement
peace (external)
peace (internal)
individualism
prosperity (economic)
spirituality
homogeneity
>>1208408
Phoneposting so apologies for format
>>diversity
4
>>education
5
>>equality
8
>>homogeneity
3
>>individualism
1
>>participation
9
>>peace (internal)
2
>>peace (external)
6
>>prosperity (economic)
11
>>spirituality
7
>>technological advancement
10
>tfw you will never know what it feels like to conquer
>>1208280
You probably couldn't handle it tbqh.
>armies don't reward you with land loot slaves and the virginal women of the conquered any more and haven't for quite some time
Why even wage war any more? For cheap medals?
>>1208333
Pretty sure ISIS still does this.
How do you feel about neopagans?
I only respect the hellenic ones that actually read up upon all the stuff believers like cicero or ancient philosophers wrote about gods in a way that results in a modernity-compatible religion that doesnt get btfo by the first abrahamic theologician that pokes holes in it.
half nazis half stupid nerds
actually they're all stupid nerds but half of them are nazis
>>1208091
Well, you could argue that other legit ethnocentric religions like yazidis are nazis too them because they are ethnocentric.
Discuss
& humanities was a mistake
Some americans are retarded in a very special way?
HP is like 600 pages a book.
Aint no class in america that got time fo that
Are you happy rolling your rock up the hill every day just to watch it fall back down, anon?
yeah
>Not changing the trajectory you're rolling
baka desu senpai