(Discuss Horatio Nelson and his exploits)
A short history in paintings
Nelson as a lad
>>2496029
>his exploits
Dying like a bitch from a sniper?
>>2496039
Soon his bloodthirsty *nglo genes kicks in and he goes in for blood against innocent spanyards.
I think the English upper class is one of the most remarkable group of people in history.
They were just a band of French adventurers who took over a tiny miserable backwater island, and yet they molded and steered that crummy nation populated with extraordinarily mediocre and untalented people to unsuspected heights, at times and in some ways almost approaching France in greatness.
It really makes you wonder just how much a people less devoid of any redeeming qualities than the English could have benefited from French leadership.
>>2495810
I like French history a lot but this meming is getting a little tiring.
>>2495810
Depends what native Britons you're talking about, the picts weren't subservient they were wild and unruly
Francophilia has gone too far
This is an embarrassing picture.
Guy on the end of the right looks like a fat bastard, guy left of him looks like a woman, Oswald looks like a LARPer and the guy to his left looks like cockney scum. Only decent one is the end of the left.
>>2495729
Lmao can only imagine that time mosley and the boys marched down some street in their gay turtlenecks and got battered by crowds of angry Irish communists
What a character
a total meme, he reminds me of youtube nuphilosophers
ITT : Justice well served
stay mad, Kraut lovers
Reminder that USA choosed Hiroshima and Nagasaki cause they were the most christian cities of Japan
were dwarves of german folklore real?
>>2495484
Yes
>>2495484
Yes
Of courshe.
THE ART OF WAR
https://youtu.be/x8cmc9Thq3c
Arguing can win war?
All behave like kids. Lose mean lose, nothing to feel proud for losing war.
Angela merkel are traitor?
Even simple thing, like traitor need to highlight mean you nowhere near to a traitor but dont even know how, to respect someone that treat you better.
LOSER THAT DONT KNOW HOW TO LOSE
You lost because of other using arrow, were act of coward and other side have more.
How would i know, what kind of rules, that you try to bind as meaning of war.
Traitor? What about the "nightmare" which you justified as conclusion. You somehow missed the reason that "lost the war" even the name can tell a conclusion or just the traitor name, later rephrased as "nightmare".
You learn nothing from your mistake and keep trying to justify, which side were better even they already death.
Fear of losing, then why your side stand at the battleground? They lost their lives but not the war.
THE UNDERSTANDING
Dont twist facts about how noble is your side, in telling the supporting group to leave, when your side already pinned by enemy.
Fight, the supporting group go 1st but somehow the significant of the war, without their names.
Who know, what eating your minds when try to justify glory from losing war?
Surrender can stand as option after killing so many from other side.
"A trail of blood" is how they died from fighting a way out.
But from how the battle ended where it started, that mean your side even rotating formation, to get out from a pinned position, were not your side tactical knowledge.
Backing the wall indeed a death choice insense why other use arrow, to finish off your side.
TACTICAL STRENGTH?
How to face a "both end pinned position". Cos only pig die standing.
HOW TO MAKE THINGS DIFFICULT
(So enemy from both side cannot coordinate for a reason to kill cos that is the advantage from pinning opponent)
Go from horizontal, to vertical and if they move at the right timing, they can cut thru the back, to form back a new defence line and seal off the bypass.
Contingency plan can stop other using arrow during the move by pinning back the opponent in between them.
Is that so difficult to justify?
WEAKNESS
No precaution measure (bypass), No tactical strength and No contingency plan.
All these were the factor, on why your side lost the battle. Too arrogant till underestimated your opponent. In the end, it still comeback to the same conclusion
(why you lost, nothing listed above related to other)
Precaution measure have many way insense how to seal off the bypass, not using soldiers.
Cos who dont understand, the choice of battleground, were at the tightest spot of the channel.
Then how to see, why they lost could be blamed on other, if the bypass exist at the battleground, that picked by the losing side?
Did other complaint anything from the choice of battleground till weapon used by the losing side.
Then how to justify, using arrow or have more soldier is a form of unfairness
No need to dispute cos the reason of your arguement already fixed. Me just highlight the reason and cause cos if the bypass were sealed by the losing side before they went for battle, they would not be pinned.
Then who is the problem? That allow a traitor using the bypass, to sell them like pig, for other to slaughter.
THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANT FACTOR, THAT DECIDE THE WINNER (the combined reason of a cause)
Traitor + Bypass = The cause, which could be avoided if either one were missing (no traitor or no bypass)
Bypass indeed, were the unforgivable mistake cos this factor bound like UNFORCE ERROR.
(Don't blame other, for losing a war - will never be wrong)
OVERALL - BASED ON THE MOVIE
https://youtu.be/GVQY6Si8Kq8
You mean Spartak were those kids that count sweet on other hand and cries, if other have 9. Spartak need 10 to stop crying cos their homeground advantage, are not enough.
Why? Cos we know, how other war movie were made, where the minority side use their homeground advantage by laying traps or use ambush techniques, to defeat a huge invading army.
But your Spartak left a backside, for other to Fxxk.
How 300 were made, like they never watch movie nor their home have tv.
It just a propaganda sentiment, based on what blinded their whole life, from seeing the true picture.
Are you sure, the losing side never expected Spartak could hold the invading Persian army?
Just they cannot accept the outcome, which they expected to win and justify their lost, were unfair. That is why, the losing side start blaming other, for their lost.
They cannot accept the result based on half time ended, favouring Spartak.
It just like a football match and those punter that lost their bet but never once blame their prediction were wrong, yet keep picking up wrongdoing, bias judgement and corrupted decision thru out the match, that at fault in creating the end result.
(Why their prediction were never wrong)
They are just loser, that dont know how to lose. Cos they dont care about why a football match end at 90 minutes, not 45.
You dont like football? Then you should understand, why the match were favouring Spartak but in the end, they lost.
(Other found out, their backside can fcuk)
What? Your sense cannot tell,
Spartak were not hero but nothing better than Buffalo. Cos only bull run at one direction.
Behave like cow could work? You mean at the farm. Your kind of hero, were just an aftermath myth.
NOTHING BUT BULL SXXXX
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I6yPojmIS0
Can anyone give me a quick rundown on the hall of cost?
I bet you thought this would be clever.
>>2495167
Its not bad.
>>2495125
I would love to give you a rundown, but my 80HD is acting up.
Post the greatest gay/bisexual historical figures ITT
>>2491889
Elagabalus
Gauis julies Ceaser the queen of Bithynia , conquer of gaul etc
Hadrian
Don't worry French anons you're being included in the 14th
>>2477265
Is there a Somme or Passchendaele level in the main game? Thinking about buying this desu senpai
>>2477265
>Cover art shows a white man
Sacrebleu
>>2477298
>French were the only power to use african troops in continental Europe
>they're the ones who get a white guy on the cover
Hon hon anglos and allemands, la patrie wins again! Vivre le France!
If the Yuan and Qing dynasties were legitimate successors to the Song and Ming, why isn't the Ottoman Empire the legitimate successors of the Eastern Roman Empire?
>>2490129
really made me think
Because they were all the same kind of chinks while T*rks are insects.
>>2490129
Because the Yuan and Qing absorbed the bureaucracies and systems of their predecessors largely intact.
How did the Blitzkrieg advance so rapidly if the German army wasn't wholly mechanized/motorized?
Germans can walk really fast.
>>2495134
Horses.
>>2495134
THEY TARGETED CRITICAL PRIMARY POINTS, THEN MOVED TO THE SECONDARY ONES, THEN THE REST.
what defines mental illness ?
Being a muslim
psychological issues stemming from organ damage or genetic defection. calling it an "illness" only functions on a spectrum of comparison, which cannot be done from the first-person perspective, i.e. the only perspective one can have.
in society, many psychologists also consider a bunch of opinions on groups of behavior "mental illness", for example "depression" or "borderline personality", but there isn't any material evidence that these things aren't simply bad behavior or even inherently incorrect. behavior-based studies suffer even more from contextual comparison requirement than disorders with physical evidence such as schizophrenia or the autism spectrum.
for example, if a khoisan man suddenly knew english and was dropped into a small city in the midwest, I think there would be a decent chance he would end up in a mental ward with a diagnosis. without physical evidence, it's all subjective and relative.
>>2494995
Jews do.
What was his fucking problem?
inbreeding
#wow
>>2494212
being severely retarded
>>2494212
being more inbred than the child of a brother and sister.
What was life like for the sedentary people living under the rule of mongols?
Shorter than they expected, most likely
>>2494190
Heh
>>2494178
>continue doing same shit
that's it
What is Jerusalem worth?
>>2493428
nothing
>>2493440
Everything?
>>2493428
Everything.