Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1523. page

>>2503633
Nobody south of the Sahara should have independence.

>>2503646
/thread

>>2503646
What about the Horn of Africa?

File: alexseibrusilov.jpg (128KB, 767x1064px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 767x1064px

>>2503513
Lutsk was a work of genius.

If only his partner commanders had supported his offensive.

I dunno have you? Do you represent all Arabs?

>>2503499
I've just never seen an arab say "that's anti-semitic". Whereas everybody knows about how the Jews hit that button on the daily.

File: keity.jpg (39KB, 600x593px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x593px

sorry habibi but the term "anti-semitism" is more about the ethnic group of jews rather than semitic people
which is obvious considering most Ashkenazi "jews" that like to fling that expression around have little to no semitic blood in them

which is why Arabs can't use it or these last 20 years would be worse than the shoah

By threatening their lives, families and livelihoods if they didn't do it. Also paying their retainers. Also oaths of fealty were taken seriously (for the most part). People got up to shenanigans but you didn't just straight refuse to fight when called, it was your raison d'etre.

If you're referring to "peasant levies" you should read into that subject because they really weren't a thing, at any time, in the way they've been represented by the media

>>2502994
>they really weren't a thing, at any time, in the way they've been represented by the media
What do you mean they weren't a thing? In the sense that they were expendable, or in the sense that they didn't fight? Or in the sense that civilians weren't targeted?

>>2503020

The notion that the local lord were pressing peasants from their fields into service to act as cannon fodder is a misconception. Militias existed, but they were typically a feature of cities that had many people not engaged in farming, had some money for equipment and training, etc.

Lords were not filling out their ranks with peasant clods because a) they wouldn't have any ability at fighting, b) they would run at the first sign of trouble, and c) they were vitally important for working the land, and thus generating an income for their lord who relied entirely upon it because a lord is fucking expensive and they didn't generally engaged in any activities that generate a meaningful income themselves (leaving aside occasional shit like war booty).

So they way people are conscripted now doesn't really apply. Generally speaking the lord would use the income he derived from his peasants to pay and maintain a force of armed men whose job it was to fight for him, their only job, and consequently they could spend time practicing it and would therefore be useful. Hence "men-at-arms". They didn't need convincing, that was their profession. The peasants didn't need convincing because nobody was dumb enough to try to use them as line infantry.

File: Teddy on immigration.png (471KB, 654x478px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 654x478px

I don't think anyone has said it was founded on diversity, most people acknowledge that the natives and slaves were treated poorly for up until like 100 years, Irish were treated like shit in the 1800s, Italians were treated like shit in the early 1900s IIRC

The whole diversity thing, in the US and in general, has been a very recent thing
Also Pic related echos the same-ish sentiment as your pic OP

>>2501684
Chaos is founded upon diversity. The motto of the US is e pluribus unum: out of many, one.

The opposite of "diversity".

Neither are we a "nation of immigrants", as every single nation on earth is as such. The US is a nation of laws.

>>2501684
Nobody likes John Jay anyways. Too stupid to come up with something as brilliant as Judicial Review like Marshall, such a poor negotiator that the best he could do when trying to get British troops off of US clay was get the same fucking deal we'd already negotiated for at Paris, and had to be hard carried during the writing of the Federalist papers by Hamilton and Madison, who wrote 51 and 29 essays to his 5.

>>2501346

Preserve the Ottoman Empire as a viable threat, which would bind most of the Slavs to the Austrian core much more firmly.

File: United States of Greater Austria.png (132KB, 800x683px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 800x683px

Do what they wanted to do and federalize.

File: images.png (5KB, 318x159px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 318x159px

>>2501375
Franz Ferdinand wanted to establish a triple crown but he was thwarted

>>2501346
Honestly the Habsburg state was done for with the rise of nationalism. Too many ethnicities under one umbrella

Because it was based on a pamphlet by a Middle class Jewish NEET who really didn't know what he was talking about.

>>2500283
Yeah that makes sense. I heard that Marx never held a real job in his life.

comunism is so retarded that not even commies do it
what it failed was the USSR and it was socialist

File: 1484229907229.jpg (51KB, 500x387px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x387px

The call that won the Battle of the Marne...

Who here /Ligérien/ master race?

>>2499746
Christianization
Time
Language Shifts

>>2499746
M'Fräulein

>>2499746
>Alaric
Latinized name, originally he was called Alrekr.

They have been answered you're just too dumb and incompetent to figure it out.

A thread died for this

>>2499224

Caspere knew that.

Nails go into hands (or possibly wrists) and feet.

Crucifixion usually kills the victim through bleeding to death, exposure, infection, dehydration, or suffocation due to muscle collapse.

>>2498791

With what? 10 year olds?

Oh look another Hitler thread

Hitler had no resources and escaping to South america was a better option

>>2498063
idk but bump

Genes.

>>2498063
There was a time before any states existed and all the land was free.

Then someone decided that he wants to own that land and told everyone else that he now owns the land and the other people were stupid enough to believe him.

Now, I really hate to be in the position of standing up for Hitler, but this sounds like a manifestation of Britain's eternal butthurt about the Germans. How well-sourced is this book, anyway?

>It has long been suspected that Hitler's conquest of Europe was an attempt to compensate for a lack of potency elsewhere.

The state of journalism in 2017.

>>>/news/

He didn't start the War for one.

>>2494800
None whatsoever. LBJ was literally worse then Hitler for world peace.

>>2494800
None.