From an objective historical perspective, warrior culture is an terrible aspect of humanity. It should be discarded and prevented to return in any possible forms, if humans were to further progress.
>>2814619
>if humans were to further progress.
>Implying that a culture based on competition, survival of the fittest, merits and strength doesn't create a society in which the strong flourish and advance civilization.
>>2814619
With the exception of mexican narcos like the zetas, There are no warrior cultures anymore
This thread is going to fill up with hypermasculine polyps who have something to prove
>MUH STONGKIST
>tfw you will never destroy pagan icons with your friends
>tfw you will never kill pagans in their homes with your friends
>tfw you will never destroy the remnants of a dying pagan culture
Hold me, brothers
>you will never destroy pagan idols in front of a pagan crowd and watch their awe as you're not struck down by their imaginary demon "Gods"
>You will never close schools of degenerate "philosophy"
>You will never tear the tongues out of pagan "priests"
If you haven't read missionary stories from 19th century Africa & Asia you're missing out
>>tfw you will never kill pagans in their homes with your friends
Right, because my Lord told me to treat others they way I'd want to be treated.
Now back to /pol/, LARP fag
>>2814575
Kek
IIRC one Kongolese King buried his own mother alive because she refused to abandon her idol statue and convert to Roman Catholicism
Random thought I've had recently: it seems like common people in Europe before about 1830 or so would have had little interaction with people outside of family, and possibly their village.
There were no railroads or telegraphs to speak with people a long ways away. Most people worked in family businesses, and even if they worked outside of the family, there were no giant companies as we understand them today. I don't think there was any sort of mass education.
In Catholic Europe, church would probably be less social as well, as the mass and everything else was in Latin.
Am I way off base or is this mostly correct?
Pic unrelated, I just like large breasts.
You're hella wrong, premodern Europe had way more tightly knit communities. Church was social as shit, everyone in the community went on sundays. Everyone knew the people they interracted with day to day. You'd say hi to Mike the butcher and then Sam the baker and then Anon the farmer, you wouldn't just go to the supermarket and shop for the entire week without saying a word to the nameless, identityless cashier
>In Catholic Europe, church would probably be less social as well, as the mass and everything else was in Latin.
Not at all. The church was the corners-torn of social events, festivals and gatherings. Just because the Mass was in Latin doesn't mean everything else the Church did was.
>>2814045
>Church was social as shit, everyone in the community went on sundays.
Not only that but obviously during Saints days, the icon they would bring around town was in the Church.
Why do Slavs suck at war unless they have a massive overwhelming advantage?
The Soviets won, though. They took Karelia, just as planned.
this thread is shit-tier bait, russians used to win battles when massively outnumbered, it's not slavs who suck it's commies
>>2814009
They may have won, but their losses were massive
Who was closer to conquering Europe?
>>2813885
Hard to say. I'm going to say Napoleon since he was closer to defeating Russia than Hitler since Moscow did fall. Granted it was a deathblow but still. German soldiers could only catch distant glances of the kremlin while French troops saw it burn firsthand.
Napoleon actually had a chance to secure his conquest.
>>2813885
Napoleon stood a decent chance of winning if he hadn't engaged in the Peninsular and Russian Wars.
Hitler was screwed the moment he decided to fight Britain AND the Soviets AND America.
including only conception of satan as in Abrahamic,Mazdan, or gnostic traditions
That sure as fuck would be a more accurate depiction.
>>2813341
Closest i can think of is the 3 Godesses of war and death in Irish mythology
>>2813345
I agree. Satan isn't masculine in his means: as in he isn't open, direct,and necessarily aggressive.
He is traditionally believed as having traits associated with feminine methods of subversion, seduction, and dishonesty.
What do I think about France?
I'm french. There is absolutely too much to say. I'm aware of almost every aspect.
If you want to know my conclusion for the present times here : a great history, lot of potential in many ways but EU dictatorship and banks destroy everything for a minority of rich and powerful people who are doing the same almost everywhere in the world.
Sad times in france...
France is a pile of doody and penises with peepee all over it.
>>2813131
The Franco-German union is what makes France relevant though.
Jesus is jewish.
Jesus is god
therefore god is jewish
Can anyone show me where my logic is wrong?
Jesus was some crazy guy.
God isn't real.
Therefore there's no jewish god.
>>2812736
>>2812742
This thread is bogus. But if you truly believe there can't be athiest, then put that Fedora on yourself.
evolutionarily speaking why are women loud during sex
>>2812676
t. Virgin.
>>2812676
Because you don't give them the belt
>>2812676
Have you ever been with a woman?
This... is modern war.
>>2812520
Pls do not post gay porn in /his/
DEAD
>>2812543
FOR
If knowledge is ultimately derived from a set of basic axioms and postulates, then what set of criteria do we use to determine those axioms and postulates in the first place?
>>2812415
We pull it out of our ass.
>>2812421
*we have faith
Its all physiological. The furthest-down root to why we believe something will be biological/physiological
Did fascism get an unfair start?
How would fascism be viewed today if it didn't appear right before a large war?
And I mean fascism, not national socialism.
>>2812160
IDK, (((They))) taught it to me synonymously. It would probably be same shit, different day.
Maybe if the Pink-skins would be all-inclusive towards their extermination of the weak, inefficient and timid and the exemplification of traits of the strong, intelligent, and hard-working, then it could get boots off of the ground before some above-average autist realize what they're doing is wrong. But I highly doubt it. Civilization has reached it's peak buddy. Implementing any one of those plans that gained popularity in the 20th century would be like putting extra spoilers on a Lamborghini, yeah it'll get you a bit further, but not much
>p.s, I used Triple parenthesis cause I thought it would be funny, I'm not a pink skin
>>2812160
Fascism is the exact cause of the war though. Your asking how the ideology would be viewed if it were different and non-expansionist.
>>2812443
>Fascism is the exact cause of the war though.
>christian zionists
Jesus was jewish. Jews are the chosen people.
>>2812114
Then why do Jews reject him?
>>2812229
They say Jesus didn't fill all the requirements in the old testament to be considered the mesiah. Google it.
what happens here?
>>2811900
Someone, post that video of the Chinese burning the shit out of the Afghans with fucking bipod flamethrowers.
Empires die
As an Afghan let me explain.
-Opium
-BTFO commies
-fuck goats
-islam (religion of piss)
Us diasporafags are objectively some of the best human beings (the non-muslim ones at least), however the region itself is quite problematic.
Does propaganda really work?
I feel like once it becomes excruciatingly obvious it fails as a piece of propaganda.
Pic related
People say "people are fucking stupid!", but I don't believe that. I believe mis-information is an effective tool, but that's barely close to full-blown propaganda. I can't fathom those TV ads payed for by politicians having much solid ground in the minds of people that care enough to vote because of this. You can grab dirt on your enemy, but that doesn't stop voters from scrutinizing you.
I feel that human beings are inclined to skepticism, and most will look at who conveys the message before they look at the message itself.
What do you think?
What's the historical trend on this?
>>2811518
I think you're completely wrong and you underrate how gullible people can be and how easy it is to control them by misinformtion and propaganda
also the access to infinite information and high literacy rates has contributed to nothing in this matter
>>2811518
#woke
#outofthematrix
#hackerlife
Propaganda isn't some spoopy mechanism designed to control people's minds. It's just basically advertising or public relations.