From an objective historical perspective, warrior culture is

>>2814619
>if humans were to further progress.
>Implying that a culture based on competition, survival of the fittest, merits and strength doesn't create a society in which the strong flourish and advance civilization.

>>2814619


With the exception of mexican narcos like the zetas, There are no warrior cultures anymore

File: IMG_1702.jpg (114KB, 513x874px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 513x874px

This thread is going to fill up with hypermasculine polyps who have something to prove
>MUH STONGKIST

File: 1490254470930.png (129KB, 435x209px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 435x209px

>>2814619
the benefit of warrior culture is that the losers do not come back whining and feeling entitled to some respect

t. beta
War accelerated progress. We're culturally stagnated for decades. We never returned to the moon. All the resources go to feed niggers. Young people become nihilistic and destructive because they face no hardships.

File: 1482382558822.jpg (976KB, 936x4105px) Image search: [Google]

976KB, 936x4105px

>>2814639
yeah like this black belt BJJ

>>2814653
yeah hedonists cannot live without their material progress

>>2814619
It's an important aspect of human history since technological progress was often tied with the need of warrior class to have best weapon and technology at it's disposal.

File: die Zukunft.jpg (200KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1000x650px

>>2814619
>progress towards
YEAAAH BOYYYY FUTURE HERE WE GO

>>2814948
i want to kms

>>2814948
That actually looks pretty comfy, why is this a bad thing again?

>>2814638
Are they truly a warrior culture? More like highly sophisticated cartel.

>>2814948

I'm so looking forward to this.

>>2815003
>>2814985

Why, anon? Honest question. It seems like truly a death of human dignity.

>>2815006

Why are you assuming I have dignity?

>>2815018
I apologize.

Obviously you Western people have long lost any form of dignity or honor. I wonder when will you start to fuck corpses in streets.

>>2815028

I would if there was a hot corpse in the street and I was allowed to, leftists banned it.

>>2814619

Just because you're a pacifist nu-male doesn't mean you get to shit on everything warriors of the past stood for and went through. If it came down to it would you just keel over and die without giving a fight because violence is barbaric?

Tough experiences open your eyes to how beautiful peace is and yes I agree a lot of warriors became pacifists after but just to reject something because it looks scary or tough is ridiculous.

Your ancestors before you fought for the very ground you're stood on, show some fucking respect.

>>2815036

Worry not, anon. After we wipe out right wing, leftist will fold as well.

Daily reminder that the moment the athenians left old homer warrior culture (With Socrates and Plato) it started western civilisation.

>>2815006
With what do you associate "human dignity?"

>>2814653
Because flying to the moon is a enormous waste of resources, while we have advanced tremendously in all other fields: medicine, informatics, infrastructure

>>2815071
All those fields advanced because of war.

We would not have antibiotics without people trying to treat infected, wounded soldiers.

We would not have computers without massive investment by the military to invent gunnery computers.

We would not have our highway system without the need to transport large numbers of soldiers. Seriously, Eisenhower started the interstate program after seeing how great the autobahn was for German troop movements in WW2, and fearing a Soviet invasion, wanted the same system in the US.

>>2814663
>It's an important aspect of human history since technological progress was often tied with the need of warrior class to have best weapon and technology at it's disposal.

Having a "warrior culture" makes you less ljkely to innovate, not more, because "muh honor" and the fact that pouring resources into your fighting force has opportunity cost. History is full of warrior cultures getting completely btfo by more creative societies.

>>2815059

Without it you end up like the Chinese who don't have enough honour, honesty, initiative, innovation, back bone, etc. to fill a tea cup.

>>2814619
>objective historical perspective
>objective perspective
>objective

kek

File: arminius.jpg (356KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1024x768px

warrior cultures are very difficult to oppress, especially if it runs deep and you have peasants learning to use the longbow and such

>>2815090
The Japanese are a prime example.
>warrior culture
>same weapon technology from 800s ad to 1500s at least, only changing due to Portuguese/Dutch firearms
>little significant change in agricultural technology after terrace farming
>little to no innovation in any other fields
>gets BTFO anytime a western power engages until the Meji Restoration

>>2815174
relatively speaking none of those things are exceptional

>>2815174
The Japanese are a bad example, due to the isolationism they practiced, which was a time of long peace, which ironically had little progress occur

progress to what?

>>2814619

Aristocracy has many good qualities:
>meritocratic
>promotes traditional values
>ensures the state preserves a strong military deterrent
>frees the common man from having to serve in war
>has a strong tendency to patronize the arts

Sure I wouldn't want to live in a pure aristocratic state, but some degree of aristocracy certainly has a place in a modern complex society.

>>2815215
>Aristocracy has many good qualities:
>>meritocratic

Lolwut

>>2815199
A society leftists can engineer like putty without anyone saying "nah, I don't think I should be taxed into poverty and have to move to overpopulated cities where illegal immigrants and refugees are given preferential treatment over me for being more diverse".

>>2814629
Yep, how the nazi dooing this day?

>>2815221

What part of that simple word didn't you understand? Anyone can rise within an aristocracy to become an aristocrat by serving in war.

>>2815277

>What part of that simple word didn't you understand?

Not him, I get that you're using it in the ancient sense but you have to be willfully ignorant to act as if that 'simple word' isn't HEAVILY associated with hereditary rank with jealously guarded exclusivity, essentially just winning the lottery with birthright.

When 99% of people hear the word 'aristocrat' it's immediately associated with 'born into privilege'.

File: 003.png (89KB, 261x238px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 261x238px

>>2815232
Please neck yourself because that's not Nazi ideology. Nazi's believe that a specific race is superior, he's talking about survival of the fittest and competition.

>>2814948
>that t-shirt

manly

>>2815126
reminds me of this https://youtu.be/7Z6TecVZAhk
90 minutes of a kid saying how his perspective is objective and he only uses reason

>>2814619
>objective historical perspective
>further progress.

>>2814619
Humans are warriors though, the most common behavior of human boys is fighting eachother and violence excites humans as well.

>>2815199
>progress to what?

What do your think? A better society.

>>2816318
Better for whom?