>The Misfits, then the Stingers, then Jem
>In that order
Also, Kimber is best girl
Misfits = Jem and the Holograms > Stingers
Roxy is the best girl
>>88280626
That's not how you spell Stormer.
>>88280741
Roxy is better than that timid moe POS
>there are people browsing this board RIGHT NOW that preferred Boomer over Snaps
boomer is way cuter. snaps is just so generic. but obviously kid vid is the absolute best.
Kid Vid best boy
I like Wheels because he is the least likely to escape from my basement
Underrated/obscure villain songs?
https://youtu.be/Rbh1LNQxgkk
Here's some more, to get us started: https://youtu.be/n6ai7Rtn-NA
https://youtu.be/IQxkG2O_d6A
https://youtu.be/g_IJVXZSLhA
>>88279431
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx3bnNQPgo0
>>88279431
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOeK0Ig-H9g
/newfag/ here, what is the best sonic comic series and why?
>>88279214
You just posted the series AND the reason.
>>88279214
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arMnOQ9zTbs
>>88279214
sonichu
You dare rise against me? The human era is over. The mutant era has come.
>>88279142
>>88279142
You say that, but isn't your race getting gassed back to the fucking stone age right about now?
I'm sorry
Illumination made Hop? Explains a lot.
I'll do my best
>Despicable Me
>Despicable Me 2
>Secret Life of Pets
>Lorax
>Minions
>Hop
To be honest I barely remember them
>Despicable Me
>a piece of dog shit
>Despicable Me 2
>The Secret Life of Pets
>Minions
>Hop
>uncontrollable bowel movements
>The Lorax
I predict that Sing will be between TSLoP and Minions.
Comics "journalist" Jude Terror examines why!
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2016/12/08/comic-book-resources-hate-scott-lobdell/
>On Wednesday, Eisner Award winning website Comic Book Resources posted a fifteen page slideshow listicle titled “X-Men: Why Generation X Was THE Mutant Comic Of The ’90s.” Arming ourselves with the most advanced adblocker technology we could get our hands on, we braved all fifteen slides to see what CBR had to say, and came away with a shocking conclusion: CBR hates Generation X creator Scott Lobdell.
>In an article that asks readers to click fourteen times just to read the content of a single story, CBR mentions Lobdell’s name only once, even though Lobdell not only co-created the series with Chris Bachalo, but also wrote it from 1994 to 1997, more than half of the time period covered in the listicle’s title. Surely, Lobdell’s contributions played at least some role in Generation X being “THE Mutant Comic of the ’90s,” especially as Lobdell himself is synonymous with 90s mutants due to writing both main X-books for a time as well as Generation X. And yet, Bachalo’s name is mentioned three times throughout the article, while Lobdell is only mentioned once, during slide #6, “It Inspired Flashback Month,” and even then only in passing while praising Bachalo’s art from Generation X #17. Roger Cruz, Tom Grummett, Warren Ellis (three times), Brian Wood (twice), Jay Farber, and even Chris Claremont (who didn’t have anything to do with the book) all receive at least as many mentions as Lobdell, showing what can only be interpreted as a clear bias against Bob Harras’s favorite writer. Heck, Scott Summers is mentioned three times in the post, and he’s not only not part of Generation X, but he’s also a fictional character!
>It’s tempting to think that perhaps CBR isn’t mentioning Lobdell because of his past indiscretions with sexual harassment. In 2013, Lobdell was famously called out for inappropriate comments made he made to cartoonist Mari Naomi at a comic con panel. Naomi kindly didn’t name Lobdell in her post about the incident, but Lobdell named himself soon after when he apologized. However, as noted above, CBR mentions Brian Wood twice despite his widely publicized issues with Tess Fowler and subsequent defense of all accused sexual harassers in a newsletter attacking people who speak out about them and saying it would lead to an accused sexual harasser committing suicide. In fact, CBR is notoriously reluctant to even talk about sexual harassment in comics at all, being caught deleting forum threads about Eddie Berganza’s repeated alleged sexual harassment at DC Comics, declining to publish a Joseph Illidge editorial about the subject, and only reporting on the story a week after it broke (and several years after Bleeding Cool originally reported on it) in a hedging, cautious report seemingly run only because they were left with no choice due to everyone else talking about it, and never again after that. So that can’t possibly be the reason, right?
>No, it’s clear that CBR must have some kind of personal grudge against Scott Lobdell for unknown reasons. Perhaps it will be explained in an upcoming twenty-three slide clickbait listicle titled “23 Reasons CBR Hates Scott Lobdell,” but even if that happens, there’s no guarantee Lobdell’s name will be mentioned in it more than once. We may never get to the bottom of CBR’s hatred of Scott Lobdell, but Bleeding Cool will keep you updated on this ongoing story as it develops.
Lobdell is the second greatest X-writer ever to Claremont
>>88279077
linking to bleedingcool should be a bannable offense
Fuck off, Rich
Just saw it.
Never thought I'd give a damn about a c-list (d list?) superhero.
Anyone else found yellow jacket's death pretty gruesome?
Anyone else think he was a better villain than ultron?
>>88278625
>D list
Motherfucker Ant Man was a founding Avenger (well Hank was anyway). In a way, Cross was a lot like Ultron and represented Hanks fragile mental state in the comics
Piece of shit generic movie. Thor tier of nothingness.
>>88278687
The Avengers weren't even A listers until the MCU, calm down.
Also no this movie was pretty shit, and by shit I mean it was exactly by the books MCU....at this point I expect them to deliver something new, just making an "ok" or passable film isn't ok anymore if it's the same exact movie they did before....each time the re use the same formula the less acceptable it gets
So was this a good adaptation of the classic Christmas story?
I personally liked it.
Having Jim Carrey voice not just Scrooge but all the ghost to be a reflection of Scrooge was a neat idea.
I just can't do the motion capture
Plus the action sequences and setpieces designed for 3D looked like a rail shooter game
>>88278551
2/10 regret seeing it
Can we get some dark, existential, or just down right depressing stuff that was in kid's media? Can be movies, comics, cartoons, whatever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nl9NSif4q68
She spies on Jessica a lot
has a penis
>>88278003
Good
>>88277988
Why is this allowed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR0pREAUzaQ
>>88277924
whys what allowed?
Yeah, why are random threads about random YouTube videos allowed?
She was supposed to win in the first 10 seconds
Why did her parents divorce?
Kept arguing over who's genes it is that made her so damn ugly.
>>88277758
If your daughter ended up looking like that you'd have to blame someone.
Barring the presence of nearby toxic waste dumps you'd only have your spouse to resent for their obviously inferior genes
That resentment grows until you have to split
>>88277758
I'd divorce my wife too if our child came out with a mouth on her chin.
OTP thread?
>>88277370
How many threads do we need? Just plot to get Bendis fired or not already.
Thank you, bendis.
Bendis was a mistake.
>mfw I just got done watching Finding Dory
How does /co/ feel about this movie? I can't wait for the next one.
Any secrets or juicy information about this that you guys could share?
It was ok but significantly worse than the original and kind of forgettable.
The Mask is okay.
It's funny but it's not at all like the comic.
>>88276901
The second half was a lot better than the first half.
I felt like it ended too soon.
Why the fuck did they not give the aquarium fish from the first movie any screentime?