File: images (19).jpg (16KB, 443x332px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 443x332px
What is it all about?
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
ass
>>
>>9085025
This thread belongs in /b/ fucking idiot
>>
>>9085025
Falsifying claims and venerating claims that are currently too difficult to falsify.
File: Chemtrails.jpg (52KB, 1210x680px) Image search:
[Google]
52KB, 1210x680px
Is it possible that the whole world has autism or something similar? Heavy metals cause autism and they've been spraying us for years. How can we reverse the effects?
10 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>9084941
No, the entire human species is just dumb.
>>
No one who understands the importance and volatility of culture would seek for answers in mere chemicals.
>>
File: g-JaGhnrTj-XT19DIxGp8Rgw5DvIDTzyF7Asz-3s7ro.jpg (23KB, 320x160px) Image search:
[Google]
23KB, 320x160px
>>9084941
Alex Jones: "Chemicals are making 4chan Pepe Frogs Gay!"
http://youtu.be/qUEy55r49fY
http://youtu.be/WyGq6cjcc3Q
File: _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f.jpg (29KB, 660x574px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 660x574px
Let's be real, what's the reason why women are so utterly devoid of interests, hobbies and anything that could make them interesting?
5 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1501759966598.jpg (177KB, 814x982px) Image search:
[Google]
177KB, 814x982px
Women are interesting. You're just bitter virgin who can't get any. Sad!
>>>/r9k/
>>
every trait you inherit comes down to this: will it help you reproduce. for more men than women, it's yes. the drive to explore, to create etc, are things that attract women. not the other way around.
>>
>>9084904
is there anything female that is interesting beyond motherhood?
literally everything else was invented by males.
File: vanadium.jpg (31KB, 300x253px) Image search:
[Google]
31KB, 300x253px
Why is vanadium so rare? All other low atomic number elements are commonish.
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
It got vanned.
>>
>>9084885
Element abundance is mostly to do with atomic number and nuclear binding energy. More low atomic number elements because the universe started with only hydrogen. High binding energy because fusion will tend to go toward those targets. It also depends on chemical properties, so helium for instance has escaped the earth pretty easily.
Perhaps a better example is lithium: atomic number 3, but has about the same abundance as neodymium, because it has a very low nuclear binding energy.
Anonymous
Just woke up from a sleep. Is it solved yet? 2017-08-04 04:18:33 Post No.9084776
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Just woke up from a sleep. Is it solved yet? 2017-08-04 04:18:33 Post No.9084776
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_8689.jpg (11KB, 106x144px) Image search:
[Google]
11KB, 106x144px
Just woke up from a sleep. Is it solved yet?
Anonymous
2017-08-04 04:18:33
Post No. 9084776
[Report]
[View this topic]
Just had a long sleep. Please update me /sci/ is it solved yet? Tell me what is new with mathematics since I left.
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>9084776
Mathematician accepted the axiom of nothing which states that you can't know nothing.
We are back at the beginning. Last year some guy won a fields medal by proving that 1 exists and today mathematicians are trying to prove that 1+1=2
File: H_I_V_E_L.jpg (130KB, 640x360px) Image search:
[Google]
130KB, 640x360px
Hankclan.net
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
pseudo mystical larping and deluded edge-faggotry belongs on >>>/x/, kiddo
>>
Underage b&
File: ef54703f0612569a_bbt_thm_16.9_1920x1080.jpg (25KB, 370x208px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 370x208px
An object containing the mass of the entire universe would have an escape velocity much, MUCH higher than the speed of light.
Therefore a "big bang" could never have happened in the first place because the material being flung out would have to be moving faster than the speed of light to get dispersed.
Bazinga.
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>9084714
K. Not that you give a shit, but that isn't a claim that the Big Bang theory leads to. The point of the concept is to describe how space used to be tiny at one point and then got bigger. There was no explosion that had a point of origin.
>>
>>9084714
According to Wikipedia (fuck, got it in twice today) It was moving faster than light for its first few itty-bitty seconds. Hey, don't shoot the messenger.
>>
Yep, uh huh. Anyways how does this effect my landscaping business?
File: wevealwaysbeenhere.jpg (211KB, 900x675px) Image search:
[Google]
211KB, 900x675px
“How the fuck I am going to explain the real truth about everyone’s feelings that they want to make the world a better place, and connect it to the fact that their mortal brain is simply functioning as an automatic response to their advanced brain?”
"EVERYONE is looking for understanding. We begin the quest for understanding the moment that we are born into a world where the answers to our deepest questions do not exist. The mortal experience, being a perfunctory dream response of our much more highly advanced brain, is ALWAYS GOING TO MAKE US FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO KNOW MORE THAN WHAT WE DO … than what we can … because our advanced brain knows a helluva lot more than our mortal brain does."
"Can you imagine a part of your brain that is not in line and doing what the rest of your brain wants it to do? Can you imagine the conundrum, not only mentally, but physically? WHAT A HEADACHE!
Hopefully, I am going to be able to explain why the mortal experience takes place in our advanced, eternal brains, how it takes place, and most importantly, the only way it can take place in order to properly perform the action that the rest of our eternal brain needs it to do.
Everything about fulfilling the needs and expectations of our advanced-brain, everything about the mental process that we perceive as the experience of mortal life, depends on the other people with whom we engage our minds so that the experience can take place. In other words, if we do not learn how to get along with each other and allow each person to pursue their mortal life the way that that individual wants, the mortal experience will ALWAYS end up the same way, with the same result, that it has throughout the history of this earth: in complete annihilation of the human race."
2 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: ringinsideofringinsideofring.jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 480x360px
"(Really, all this means is that we “reset the game” and try again. Each time, taking with us knowledge and experience of how the other players play in order for us all to be able to play The Game of Mortal Life the way that it was setup to be played, the ONLY way that it can go on to provide our advanced, eternal brain with the experiences that it needs, for the reason it connects with other advanced humans during the process.)"
How much work would it take to transition to a Computer science masters after a bachelor in a completely unrelated field? Has anyone here done this?
Don't know how to code at all. Didn't have any significant amount of math in bachelor and don't remember jack shit from high school.
Where would I even start? I've seen people recommend the CS50 course from Harvard. I've also seen some Unis that offer transitional courses for people in my position but I don't think I'll be in a position to study in the UK specifically to take advantage of this.
Thanks lads
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>9084687
Or should I do something like the Python program on coursera to see if I like programming at all?
>>
Which completely unrelated field? Depending on what it was, it might be more relevant than you think.
>>
>>9084707
Business. The most math we did was basic stats which contains next to nothing that would be useful.
File: Stars Wars Spacecraft.jpg (665KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
665KB, 1920x1080px
Non /sci/ here
I know high school physics, and single variable calculus (more like basic differentiation and integration).
Can somebody give me a list of topics I should study in succession to be able to understand quantum physics?
I don't care if it takes 10 years..
4 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: quwitch.jpg (64KB, 333x499px) Image search:
[Google]
64KB, 333x499px
Calculus, single, multiple, vector.
Differential equations, partials.
Wave physics.
Linear algebra.
The math's not that hard in itself, the difficulty is interpretation of it.
>>
>>9084680
Learn how to do basic physics problems with calculus.
Calculus Based Physics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uo28HOrhipc&list=PLUdYlQf0_sSsb2tNcA3gtgOt8LGH6tJbr
Electricity&Magnetism (requires multivariable/vector calc)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtlJoXxlSFE&list=PLyQSN7X0ro2314mKyUiOILaOC2hk6Pc3j
this stuff>>9086158
Once you have multivariable/vector calc and enough physics
Lagrangian mechanics (principle of least action)
Hamiltonian mechanics
>>
>>9084680
phsyics 1
calc 2
physics 2
calc 3
modern physics
quatam physics
there you go.....
File: hqdefault.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search:
[Google]
15KB, 480x360px
How can there be such a difference in term of scientist innovations between 2 people living on a same planet?
America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9SjjcHd1Ec
Africa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR97o_FuX-c
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>america
>30% white
>african nations
>0% white
I
>>
>>9084677
Earth is two planets side by side.
Anonymous
Psychology or Dermatology 2017-08-04 03:06:53 Post No.9084654
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Psychology or Dermatology 2017-08-04 03:06:53 Post No.9084654
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Psychology.jpg (145KB, 600x360px) Image search:
[Google]
145KB, 600x360px
I love to social engineer people and exploit their feelings however, I have this weird feeling inside me telling me skin needs to be researched more than we have done. Which one /sci/
Also did I post this on the right board? If not what shoould I post it on.
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>9084654
Dermatology for the monies.
>>
>>9084654
Dermatology for sure
Don't fall for "le mind manipulation", it's a meme
>>
Dermatology because of the money.
File: maxresdefault.jpg (95KB, 1600x865px) Image search:
[Google]
95KB, 1600x865px
As a fantasy writer, you often have to come up with silly names. I thought of taking the easy option and just making up a fake word to describe what is essentially a rock in the sky. (Al'kath, Ingindingo, Labolobodybobohsondingiebob) But then I thought, what would a scientist call this phenomenon, if it really existed?
So, I task you /sci/ with inventing a practical name for an isle that is suspended in the sky.
Take inspiration from a literal meaning, translated to Latin, or come up with a more scientific title. Go nuts!
Enjoy!
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>9084646
Uppy turfy.
Also, I don't know what world you live in where people would rather have some invariably cringeworthy new word when you could just say "sky island"
>>
>>9084646
What are big pieces of land in water formally called?
>island
>1590s, earlier yland (c. 1300), from Old English igland, iegland "an island," from ieg "island" (from Proto-Germanic *aujo "thing on the water," from PIE root *akwa- "water") + land (n.).
Then look up etymology of "sky" or something related.
>From Middle English sky, from Old Norse ský (“cloud”), from Proto-Germanic *skiwją, *skiwô (“cloud, cloud cover, haze”), from Proto-Indo-European *(s)kew- (“to cover, hide, cloud”).
Then make up something like "siiwland" by imitating the pronounciation or something.
Sage for not science.
File: DELA-forwebsite.jpg (914KB, 1680x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
914KB, 1680x1000px
Where can I find the digitalized version of this book?
Professor Strang's other books are all over the internet but for some reason not this one.
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
How do I know if a book even exists somewhere in the internet?
>>
>>9084791
There is a place where if you type the title of that book and it does not appear then 100% guaranteed it doesn't exist.
It ends with .ru
People who deny the existence of (anthropogenic) climate change like to point out that CO2 emissions made by man are less than 1% of CO2 released by volcanoes and if that were true, it would more or less be the final nail in the coffin of man-made climate change. The fact of the matter is that the logic these people are employing is fine, it's just that their claim about volcanoes producing more CO2 than humans is simply incorrect! In other words their theory is fine but their data is way, way off.
What are some other examples of people misusing science that isn't pseudoscience, but rather dramatically misinterpreted or simply incorrect data?
2 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: nuclear.jpg (279KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
279KB, 1600x1200px
Radioactivity is a good one for misinterpretations.