How could it be proved?
Figure this out
>>9086237
Space-time geometry. Best way to understand that, I think, is in quantum gravitational fields. Gravity is fundamentally tied to space, as seen in general relativity. So in order to understand space, we must understand gravity. Quantum gravity is particularly interesting for this subject because at such a small scale, we can analyze the effects of gravity. Conversely we could relate this to where we stand in the universe, and ultimately attempt to describe spacetime geometry. The geometry of spacetime and its relation to gravity could uncover if it is possible to connect two distant points in space with an infinite gravitational well.
>>9086237
Idk why I'm typing all this out honestly, I have three degrees: astrophysics, physics, and mathematics.
The angle your dick bends to the left (or right, if you are left-handed) is defined by the equation:
a=sin(PwYc)
Where:
P=the pressure you grip your dick with while masturbating in pascals
w=the average number of times a week you wank
Y=the number of years you have been masturbating
and
c=dick-deformation-masti-constant
>>9086031
My dick curves up, like a banana. At first I thought it was bad but it's actually quite advantages to hitting the g-spot
I have a Möbius dick. The length is immeasurable
Does pressure mean the pressure OF a fluid?
Or does it mean the pressure ON a fluid?
The rule is that if T > Tsaturation, then a substance is a superheated vapor, which makes sense.
The other rule is that if P < Psaturation, then the substance is a superheated vapor.
This means that P is the the pressure being exerted on the fluid by its environment, right?
>>9085973
Its the same thing.
>>9085973
If pressure is exerted on a fluid by the environment, the fluid is pressurized.
It's the same thing.
i need to know if i can take abstract algebra before number theory
>>9085932
>>9085932
yes you can
Source: I took group theory and ring+module theory in 2nd year uni, and didn't take any number theory until 3rd year
Post brainlet questions here.
So can you like just move time and space instead of trying to move faster then light?
>>9085941
Move it? In what substance does time and space reside through which it can be moved? Luminiferous Aether? Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff?
>>9085954
Cant you just make alot of gravity some how and move spacetime, like if you was swimming through water.
Highly recommend this book
pic related
Is the penis a simple harmonic oscillator when engaged in fucking? Is this what physicists are really referring to as "simple harmonic motion"? Is the reason they teach this to kids in school, because "if you know it then you know it so you can know it"?
Is vortex-based mathematics real or is it just a bunch of bs? Is it true that it is the foundation behind zero point energy (aka free energy)? Did Nikola Tesla use this? Does this have any relation to the torus equation? Can this be applied to all branches of mathematics? Even algebra and calculus? Is this the easy math that school doesn't want to teach us? Is the math we learn in school over-complicated?
>>9085862
I'll give you a bump with an animation of vortex math and torus geometry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unqKSfZfzho
I don't know what it is but it sounds like high-school-dropout tier brainlet pseudomath.
>>9087489
From what I understand it is a good model for electromagnetic fields and could be really useful for everything that is related to them.
Tesla supposedly played around with it a lot.
Why doesn't aluminium powder "shines" as metal form aluminium?
Just to be clear by what I meant by metal form
I think it's because the surface is so rouge as apposed to the solid metal which will usually have a very smooth surface. Rough surfaces tend to cause light to bounce off randomly and makes it look darker, whereas the smooth surface of cast aluminum will give a nice reflection.
Freshly ground aluminum will also have no oxide layer formed yet, so if you wait a little bit it might start to look more reflective
The surface of the "metal form" is pretty flat, or flat enough to reflect light like this.
What are my options after getting a physics bachelors?
You can choose between prostitution and unemployment.
>>9085900
I mean in terms of graduate education.
You can always kill yourself
What substances and particles are in signals? What I'm getting at, are there substance that can be digitally transmitted and then put into a chamber to be given another substance to cause a reaction and basically make it into what it was or is intended to be?
What I'm getting at is teleporting objects over the internet, I know we've teleported particles into space, but can we can beyond mere particles, can we render objects? Can we teleport objects with data?
Do you want a coffee mug made out of electrons?
>>9085653
Maybe I want to download 4 ply toilet paper, maybe I want to send a bucket of lithium to a buddy in Thailand, I just want to know if I can do it?
no
energy to matter conversion in such a scale you are asking for takes more energy than our sun could output in approximately one second. scientists, however, found a way to turn light in a photon-photon collider into matter on a subatomic level. it would take a shit ton of energy to do that, and you just create an electron and a positron
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_16-5-2014-15-32-44
>topology
>hard
>>9085586
In the past 2 years, my concentration has been shot. When I was a young teenager, I used to REALLY be able to zone in on a task and get it done, like 100% of my brain "was" the task while I was doing it. Now, when I'm reading for fun, I will find I read a whole page and not remember one bit of it because my mind was only 20% "in" it when I was reading it. I just can't retain anything anymore. What's going on? Am I just getting older and it's harder for my brain to retain stuff now? Is anxiety getting in the way?
I'm thinking shrooms might help with this. Last time I tripped, I really "was" whatever media I was consuming.
>>/redalin/
>>9085360
reddit + ritalin = redalin?
>>9085359
4chan and MDE will have that effect on you. Problem is it's permanent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2uIW8zTPaQ
>>9085346
Exactly how i would expect anyone to do after reading wiki and some pop-sci. How did he manage to make an hour long video out of this little understanding is beyond me.
Was shitposting on r9k, got this captcha.
>Man why the fuck was this not a thing
research into fusion, magnetic confinement, etc, has been going on, since like the 40s.
>Is fusion just cucked,
>are we approaching the matter inelegantly
>not enough support for funding
>or try to prove that fusion isn't useful
Either way, pisses me off. With fusion we could adapt it for all sorts of useable shit.
>>9085057
When you look at the universe and how fucking hard it is to do fusion, you realize it was always just a meme.
For example, the tiniest red dwarfs need a mass of about 75 Jupiters. And even for larger ones, their rate of fusion is so low that they have a lifespan of trillions of years. Pic is lifespan vs mass of Sun (Sun is 1000 Jupiters).
>>9085086
Yeah, but we do it in bombs, so it aint """"hard"""" to do fusion, it's hard to control it.
That's where
>we're approaching it inelegantly
comes in
>>9085093
Yeah, I should qualify that by calling it self-sustaining fusion. That's the goal and it's hard. If the goal is any fusion at all, you can do it yourself with a homemade fusor. I just personally don't think fusion power will ever be anything but a meme.
Maybe another way to look at it.. given only a classical understanding of atoms, our Sun shouldn't even achieve fusion. It relies on pressures and temperatures that reduce atom separation enough to allow a very small amount of quantum tunneling to occur. That quantum tunneling is the elegant way. Solar core pressures simply can't happen on earth, so it leaves us just with brute forcing through temperature.