Is it really worth reading this? It seems interesting, but on the other side, I'm afraid it's just 400 pages of unremarkable memories. What do you think, /lit/?
I didn't get past the second page. I hope it's because the translation was bad because holy shit.
It's very comfy, but there's not a lot of philosophy/commentary, just his casual musings on (his) life.
If you want an easy and enjoyable book, go ahead. If you like denser and more subtle books, it's not worthwhile.
>>9122678
read about 100 or so pages. it's not very good. he struggled as a writer before he was told (by his publisher?) to give it a shot. it kind of has no purpose, just exposition.
No man is an island,
Entire of itself.
Each is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thine own
Or of thine friend's were.
Each man's death diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.
dude we all die lmao
>>9122626
welp
>>9122608
He is describing his egoistic union, only he is slightly spooked.
>old father, old artificer, stand me now and ever in good stead
What did he mean by this?
God help me
>>9122344
Tinder is degenerate and makes women have sex outside of marriage. It's liberal brainwashing.
Take the redpill
>>9122352
I have taken it lad.
I'm writing the worst book ever. AMA
>>9122222
Why are you writing Phenomenology of Spirit?
Very impressive quints btw
>>9122222
What's currently the worst book?
>>9122331
lolol
Megan Boyle VS Mira Gonzalez
which alt hipster poet has more discernible talent?
also remember mira has a real book of poetry. we aren't talking about selected tweets. is RUPI Kaur the most talented of them all?
>>9122217
kek bump for kek
I haven't read anything by either of them and prefer to keep it that way.
Is there anybody from the """"alt lit"""" """""movement""""" who deserves to be read? I've decided to grant Tao Lin and Elizabeth Ellen at least a single read. Good idea?
He knows who Rabelais is, so he is more patrician than 90% of /lit/
>>9122124
awful.
picrltd is how you reference Rabelais in fiction.
>The composition of vast books is a laborious and impoverishing extravagance. To go on for five hundred pages developing an idea whose perfect oral exposition is possible in a few minutes!
Novelists BTFO. How will they ever recover?
>>9122022
I think most writers would say the subjects in their books are not reducible to 5 minute conversations
>>9122022
kind of missing the point
the reason that a smart person with a good point to make would write a fiction novel is just because it makes it far more accessible to people
people will have a much easier time learning something if they can enjoy themselves while in the process
>>9122063
>the reason that a smart person with a good point to make would write a fiction novel is just because it makes it far more accessible to people
>people will have a much easier time learning something if they can enjoy themselves while in the process
You're a clumsy thinker. Short fiction is more accessible to the common man because it's briefer. Compare how much easier it is to watch an episode on TV, than to commit to a whole movie.
People can enjoy themselves with short fiction just as well as a novel.
Your thinking is wrong, even if your main point is right. The novel is essential for certain modes of narrative, but most prats publishing these days definitely haven't earned their lengths.
P1.) The mind exists.
P2.) Mind is not reducible to non-mind.
C1.) Irreducible mental substance exists.
P3.) Substance dualism is false.
C2.) All is mind, and Berkeleyan idealism is true. (Thus everything exists in God’s mind.)
P1.) Potato exists.
P2.) Potato is not reducible to non-mind.
C1.) Unmashable potato exists.
P3.) Culinary dualism is false.
C2.) All is potato, and Berkeleyan potatism is true. (Thus everything exists in God’s potato.)
>>9121957
P2 does not apply to potato, therefore C1 and C2 do not follow.
>>9121944
>god exists because I say so
no
After years of researching physics, astronomy, philosophy, and neuroscience, and experiencing different states of the mind with the use of psychedelics, I developed a coherent theory of everything.
It covers the nature of time, consciousness, the universe, free will/determinism, good/evil, god/oneness, and more.
Should I write this down in the style of a scientific paper, as a novel with a plot that gradually explains my concept, or more "flowery" like a poem (e.g. similar to the TaoTeChing, parts of the Bible, fables, classic poetry)?
What do you think is the best and most appealing way to communicate this?
become songwriter like taylor swift or ed sheeren
read Bataille's ouvre closely then ask yourself again
>>9121918
that would make damn long song, more like several albums, and I cannot play any instrument, don't even mention my voice...
What is the order of reading to read the Asimov's Foundation books?
>>9121565
>asimov
>>9121565
I recently started it according to publication order. Its how most people have read it.
>>9121565
Just read the first three books, pal. Rest are boring as fuck.
has anyone (philosopher) written on the essential and self aware fraudulence of human personalities? and that deep down we want only to feel power and everything is merely our minds individually wrapping around our surroundings from the places we stand and calling that identity
i just read about this (imposter syndrome) for 36 minutes and it is blowing my mind as an intellectual concept that affects. any good literature on it?
>>9121457
>deep down we want only to feel power
But thats not true. Everyone has really different views. Just look at religions and how the submit for their God.
Adorno wrote about how human history is essentially the history of the attempt at self preservation by dominating a violent and unrelenting nature, and that in modern times we have succeeded in not preserving the self but dominating nature and thus every thing we do is colored by domination and our barbaric nature is bubbling closer and closer to the surface erryday, and everything we call culture is just a veiled outlet for this barbarism with varying degrees of complexity.
What is the quintessential American lit genre and why is it science fiction?
Scifi short stories are my particular fav and I swear they are as good as any by Chekhov.
Some collections I've enjoyed:
Ursula K. Leguin - The Birthday of the World
Isaac Asimov - Nine Tomorrows
Roger Zelazny - The Doors of His Face, the Lamps of His Mouth
>>9121255
I read a sci fi story where a teenage boy obsessed with math has sex with a physical manifestation of the number 7
after that I sort of kept my distance
>>9121263
i just read a post about a retard who said he read a wtf story that any non-redditard would find intriguing
after that i sort of kept my distance
>>9121263
That sounds intriguing. Was 7 anthropomorphized? Was the story a metaphor for the obsession of mathematicians?
What is the general female reaction to the works of Bukowski? no girl I know red anything by him.
>>9121207
girls like bukowski
>>9121231
I second this.
I've known a few girls who really liked Bukowski.
All the high school girls I fucked had only really read Vonnegut, Bukowski, Murakami and a couple others.
What do you think Joyce expected the public reception of Finnegans Wake would be?
>>9121040
pretty much exactly what it was
>>9121047
Which was?
>>9121920
screaming like aristocratic monkeys who drank too much liquor
- Romantic book.
- Happens in Medieval times.
- Has a story within a story structure (like The Decameron or The Canterbury Tales).
- One of the first stories is about a guy who, while on the road to a distant place, has to spend a night at an abbey. After he goes to sleep, he unwillingly hears the priest and the cook mistress talking about preparing the next-day supper. He deduces from the discussion that they're cannibals and they're gonna murder and eat him and spends the rest of the night terrified thinking about how to get out of this alive. In the morning, it is revealed that it was all a misunderstanding and they were just talking about cooking a rabbit for their guest.
>>9121035
Also the tone of the book is light-hearted (same as The Decameron, again).
>>9121035
The Pig's Delusion
>>9121623
Is this a /lit/ meme?