What did he really think of black people? Were he more positive towards them than previous presidents? I've heard he only abolished slavery because the public wanted it
He didn't give a fuck about them as people, but the north were all sissyfags and they wanted to say bye bye to slavery, the cunts.
He didn't abolished at all, he just regularized the slavery.
>>3316584
Auto-genocidal dictator with Marfan Syndrome. Hard to tell what someone like that really thought.
was apartheid morally wrong?
>>3316532
No.
>>3316532
yes.
>>3316532
lol, lets have a majority of people be an underclass, what can go wrong?
>implying he wasn't the best thing to ever happen to Russia
he ended existence of russian state so i guess yeah
>>3316483
Well yeah he basically killed Russia for good.
He had great intentions. The russian monarchy was extremely oppressive to peasants, he wanted to make life better for them.
Did he really commit any atrocities like Stalin did anyway?
>This kills the Knight
>>3316438
What? It literally just doesn't.
>>3316438
Longbows are shit against anybody with armor. This is why crossbows produced so much butt-hurt.
Which one was objectively correct /his/?
[spoiler] How badly did Collins death along with Griffiths hamstring the new nation? [/spoiler]
Griffith was a fuckwit, nothing of value was lost
>>3316411
How so if you don't mind me asking, I haven't read up much on him.
>>3316407
Dev was a fgt
I'm waking up at the start of the end of the world
But its feeling just like every other morning before
Now I wonder what my life is going to mean if it's gone
The carts are moving like a half a mile an hour at that
I started staring at the passengers who're waving goodbye
Can you tell me what was ever really special about me all this time?
ME BIG BRAIN EMPEROR
ME SPLIT EMPIRE IN TWO AGAIN
ME SIRE RETARD BABIES WHO WILL RUIN EVERYTHING
ME GENIUS
But I believe the world is burning to the ground
Oh well, I guess we're gonna find out
Let's see how far we've come
Let's see how far we've come
I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, that which is, that which was, and that which is to come. Revelations 1:8
That quote describes "life", not an old man in the sky, or a god that looks human.
You are destroying the word of God through your traditions that you have handed down. Mark 7:13
In other words; the Bible says traditional religions destroy the truth of God. The Bible is central to the Christian religion, but they don't see what it says.
What if the Bible and all other religious books are being misinterpreted?
What if the truth is in the Bible and many other religious books, but no one can see what it is? This book uses science, philosophy, religion, art and inspiration to reveal the unseen truth. It shows that most of the great prophets, philosophers, and poets are saying the same thing, but almost no one knows what it is.
Jesus is saying something completely different than what Christians think.
Religious books are not just filled with myths and morality tales as many people believe. The truth is in them; they are just being misinterpreted by religions.
The new interpretation will be the best thing that ever happened to religion.
Religions will make sense, and people will be able to understand them for the first time. This will make religions much more popular than they have ever been.
Traditional religions will not change; people will just see the truth in them.
Religion without the truth is like a light bulb without electricity. With the truth, religions will be reborn, and there will be an explosion in spiritual growth. Religions will no longer be based just on blind faith.
Just the truth: The truth about life and death can be explained without any reference to religion, and some people may prefer that, but more than half of the human race is involved in a religion. Thus, to be the ultimate explanation of the truth, it must include religion, all religions. This is the only way to unite us all.
Newton, Einstein, and Tesla were the greatest scientists and were mystics. Science and religion have different pieces to the puzzle of life, and people need both to learn the ultimate truth of life. This book unites them for the first time.
Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.
Albert Einstein
You do not have to be smart to know the truth, but you do have to be rational, be honest, and know a few things that could not be known until now.
The word “apocalypse” means to unveil, not the end of the world.
The meaning of the apocalypse is the opposite of what most people think. It does not mean the end of the world; it means the revealing of hidden secrets and the beginning of a heaven on earth. The apocalypse is starting now.
Many things are the opposite, the mirror image, of what people think. For example, people think it is the context surrounding a statement that reveals the meaning of the statement, and that is true with normal books. With the Bible, the opposite is true. The context hides the meaning. You have to dig through a lot of rock before you find the nuggets of gold that the rock contains.
Jesus said, "When the outer has become as the inner, and the lower as the upper, then will this world find peace."
"Unless ye make the things of the right hand as those of the left, and those of the left as those of the right, and those that are above as those below, and those that are behind as those that are before, ye shall not have knowledge of the kingdom." Acts of Peter XXXVIII
Peter was given the keys to the kingdom; the quote above is the key.
This book contains a new and different interpretation of the Bible, but it is not just about religion. It is about the truth, the kind of truth you can check. It is all new, all true, and it reveals the best possible news. An open mind is required.
New and different revelations are not easy to accept. Do not let the things you disagree with stop you from reading further. Many of the things you do not agree with or understand when you first read them will make sense later in the book.
Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief. Frantz Fanon
Cognitive dissonance: Get to know these two words. It is the unseen enemy of mankind. It does more to cause war, crime and suffering than anything else, because it prevents people from learning and changing. If you are ready to overcome your cognitive dissonance and learn the truth of life, keep reading.
Save everyone: It is important to understand we do not want to hurt anyone or anything. We want to fix people and institutions that are flawed, that are sick and infected with BS. We just have the medicine, the cure. We want everyone to get better, especially the "bad guys". We are not anyone's enemy; we want to make love, not war. When the people living in the dog eat dog animal world, playing the power game, the get rich and famous game, see the truth of life, they will realize that they are their own worst enemy. They will change, because it is in their best interest to change. They will change for selfish reasons, which is fine as long as they see the truth of life and get on the path to a paradise on earth.
https://youtu.be/XpSsBdEJYNg
>>3316314
Fucking hell. I thought Goryeo was relatively obscure. I really did like studying it, hope it doesn't become a meme. Then again, this is just like pan turanism or Japanaese revisionism so it will blow over quickly.
*blocks your path*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolae_Densu%C8%99ianu
So the Hyperwar was real all along
Does anyone know the name of the comic which is set in the Hundred years war? I think it takes the perspective of a group of long bowman?
Appreciate it!
>>3316258
This one? If yes i have no idea
Crécy by Warren Ellis
It's not that good.
>>3316267
Yeah that's it!
>His holy book doesn't have pictures
>>3316136
that's cute desu
Books without pictures fucking suck
>cyrillic: the early years
>Julius Caesar
>Cleopatra
>Brutus
>Augustus Maximus Toruturous
>.......................Marc Antony
Marcus Antonius
>Imperator Caesar Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Pius Felix Invictus Augustus, Pontifex Maximus, Herculius, Germanicus Maximus V, Sarmaticus Maximus III, Persicus Maximus II, Brittanicus Maximus, Carpicus Maximus, Armenicus Maximus, Medicus maximus, Adiabencus Maximus, Tribuniciae potestatis XXI, Consul IX, Imperator XX, Pater Patriae, Proconsul
>Charlemagne
When did Roman Empire actually fell? 476, 1453, 1806 or 1917 AD?
20!8
>>3316126
>Roman Empire
>Fell
17 AD
Which was the most Libertarian like country/society in History?
Was it pre-ww1 London?
>>3316100
Subsaharan africa
Revolutionary Catalonia
>>3316109
when using technology is seen as witchcraft, that is anarcho primitivism
ITT historical leaders that were weebs
I'm going to become America's greatest president and I'm a closet weeb so
>>3316089
what the fuck is the girl on the right so impressed about ?
>>3316257
Well if this image is pre-ww2 you have to remember that the average Japanese male height was about 5'3
Why was roman weaponry so limited? They didn't use axes or maces or anything other than javelins, swords and bows as far as I know.
Also why Romans neglected cavalry?
>>3315941
That's all they needed really.
>>3315941
short swords w/ shields were absolutely perfect for their shield formations
have god tier cover then stab at the greasy gaul wherever you picked due to maneuverability of such a small weapon, as most of rome's enemies were less armoured then they were
alsso, javelins were pretty damn good, intermediate range weapon that would easily take out an enemy for the battle, if not take his life
it was really useful at taking the wind out of an infantry charge, and idk, might even be useful against cavalry harassment
btw, afaik, roman javelin = pila and roman sword = gladius, roman long sword = spatha
for anything further than that distance, only some ballista, bows (if late rome), catapults and slingers were used, but romans always like hand-to-hand melees because that was their specialty, and the ballistas and catapults would be kept for fort/city defense/siege
Spears too