Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1331. page

File: 581875_568063756546768_1991810174_n.jpg (127KB, 960x687px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 960x687px

>>2604954
dunno

>commie blocks

Impossible, communism has never been tried

File: tumblr_max1jssteS1qfvsa1o1_1280.jpg (197KB, 960x871px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 960x871px

>>2604956

>>2629332
cause of war baby

>>2629332
because they're buttblasted muh heritage larpers

>>2629332

The "butthurtedness" is just a show to rile up the people to go apeshit on the people the government labels enemies

>>2628713
>communication "science"

>>2628740
Fuck off m9 its a thing (shitty or not its a science)

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_studies

>>2628713
Anthropology in American universities is usually divided into 4 subfields:

*cultural anthropology
*linguistics
*archæology
*physical anthropology (aka /pol/ stuff)

File: 1488053584014.png (364KB, 843x454px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 843x454px

>>2628182

>>2628182
The US, since their demands for assisting the UK in the War included them giving up their overseas holding

>>2628196
Correct about auto-men and brits. They were still not completely "independent after 1948 though, at least in practice.

It was under USSR tutelage VERY briefly during 1948 and their independence war against the arab coalition. Stalin was hoping to turn them to his side but noticed rapidly that it wasn't gonna happen so he turned his back, but his support was crucial during that delicate period. It is why he is occasionally referred as the "unofficial godfather of Israel".

Then they were adopted by the French and DeGaulle all the way to 1967 and the 6 day war. DeGaulle stopped suppoeting them due to change of diplomacy post free-algeria. Also the suez canal crisis was desastrous for them and distance made sense.

Then the US swept in as patron and hasn't really left since. How can the arab league manlets even compete?

>>2628110
>Did Germany ever really have a realistic chance at winning WW2?

No.

>If their gambit with France worked, and they managed to collapsed the USSR like Hitler originally wanted, could they have won then?

Probably not. They still have no realistic means of striking decisively at the UK, let alone the U.S.. If nothing else, the war likely ends with atomic fire over Berlin.

Germany lost the war as soon as they set up the political situation that made incremental peace impossible.

>>2628110
If there was no lend-lease, as well as no America at all, then probably. Of course the government Hitler made wasn't sustainable at all.

>>2628110
They could win a small scale war not a world War. Basically Germany could eventually win an Anglo French German war.

File: C37tEeBUkAAoShN.jpg (86KB, 562x720px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 562x720px

>>2628068
pinochets helicopter rides

File: Q4-1u817e9DFdC005kImD8ljjHzSJgW2tpa1AkUxUdg.jpg (74KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 500x500px

>>2628068
WWI western front

File: 612ef31ff017bee27535013ac276de95a4ca3c1805fd1742b39ac91447f1f3f9_1.jpg (67KB, 800x621px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 800x621px

>>2628068
lincoln assassination

>muuh genes

Both are pretty cringeworthy tbhq senpai

>>2627981
Atheists have no purpose in life. Life is meaningless without God.

File: 1457136487226.png (12KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x200px

>>2627981
>every theistic faith is a simpleton approach to american protestanism because they are all the same -OP

The world-historic transformation from the ancien regime of royal or princely rulers to the new democratic-republican age of popularly elected or chosen rulers may be also characterized as that from Austria and the Austrian way to that of America and the American way. This is true for several reasons. First, Austria initiated the war, and America brought it to a close. Austria lost, and America won. Austria was ruled by a monarch-Emperor Franz Joseph-and America by a democratically elected president-Professor Woodrow Wilson. More importantly, however, World War I was not a traditional war fought over limited territorial objectives, but an ideological one; and Austria and America respectively were (and were perceived as such by the contending parties) the two countries that most clearly embodied the ideas in conflict with each other.

World War I began as an old-fashioned territorial dispute. However, with the early involvement and the ultimate official entry into the war by the United States in April 1917, the war took on a new ideological dimension. The United States had been founded as a republic, and the democratic principle, inherent in the idea of a republic, had only recently been carried to victory as the result of the violent defeat and devastation of the secessionist Confederacy by the centralist Union government. At the time of World War I, this triumphant ideology of an expansionist democratic republicanism had found its very personification in then U.S. President Wilson. Under Wilson's administration, the European war became an ideological mission-to make the world safe for democracy and free of dynastic rulers. When in March 1917 the U.S.- allied Czar Nicholas n was forced to abdicate and a new democratic-republican government was established in Russia under Kerensky, Wilson was elated.

With the Czar gone, the war had finally become a purely ideological conflict: of good against evil. Wilson and his closest foreign policy advisors, George D. Herron and Colonel House, disliked the Germany of the Kaiser, the aristocracy, and the military elite. But they hated Austria. As Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn has characterized the views of Wilson and the American Left, II Austria was far more wicked than Germany. It existed in contradiction of the Mazzinian principle of the national state, it had inherited many traditions as well as symbols from the Holy Roman Empire (double-headed eagle, black-gold colors, etc.); its dynasty had once ruled over Spain (another bite noire); it had led the Counter-Reformation, headed the Holy Alliance, fought against the Risorgimento, suppressed the Magyar rebellion under Kossuth (who had a monument in New York City), and morally supported the monarchical experiment in Mexico. Habsburg-the very name evoked memories of Roman Catholicism, of the Armada, the Inquisition, Metternich, Lafayette jailed at Olmiitz, and Silvio Pellico in Briinn's Spielberg fortress. Such a state had to be shattered, such a dynasty had to disappear."

>>2627836
yes

>>2627836
No

>>2627836
They larped as Christians because they wanted to claim Jesus was "White" and because Christianity has always been a big part of Europe. They weren't real Christians

>>2627800
Don't worry you won't exist
you won't feel or think anything
you will simply stop being

>>2627800

A Boltzmann Brain makes you watch the intro to "Drake and Josh" for eternity while it constantly keeps making (broken) promises that "this time" it will let you go.

>>2627800
I don't know about that, seems pretty peaceful to me.

File: sword1.jpg (66KB, 254x300px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 254x300px

They all bled the same, citizen.

>>2627683
Nobody gave a shit about genetics before the 1800s.

Race is unimportant. Ethnicity is everything.

How do you think we're supposed to know that? Do you think there were any geneticists running around in the 2nd century?

>>2627677
Anon nobody in charge of the lives of millions of people is "crazy". They'd fucking poison your coffee if you were.
You need a large consensus and a good enough reason to drop a fucking A-bomb.

If you launch a nuke for shit and giggles literally a hundred nations will swarm you like flies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phpe0DsisbY

Russians aren't idiots or madmen.
Slaughtering your own citizens is a different story. But act up on your neighbors and you'll end up like Saddam.

>>2627677
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Fuchs

>>2627696
>Anon nobody in charge of the lives of millions of people is "crazy".
Hitler
Pol Pot
Mao

Enough said. Also if it so easy to poison someone, why did nobody poison Hitler?

>>2627594
It is all stored, everything thats ever made is stored.

>>2627594
You can't preserve nor should you try to preserve everything. Find what is important to you and attempt to preserve it. As a normal person this is all you can do.

>>2627603
How can you be on a history board and be ignorant of media loss and degradation?

capitalism

>>2627534

Any oligarchic republic. (see Roman republic, Greek city-states, British empire, the U.S. of A,). Also the Hanseatic League.

>>2627563
The last two maybe, but the first two were run by the landed elite even if they were not the most economically productive.

Sure.

>>2627213

No, it's because the Temple was destroyed.

>>2627213
According to Christians, yes.

>>2627225
According to Jews, yes.