Why did the Nazis let the British escape at Dunkirk?
>>2728625
Why are you so retarded that you ask the question here instead of say, looking at the archives, a damn wikipedia article, or anything else?
>>2728628
With that logic this board might as well just be deleted.
>>2728641
>Just delete the board because why aren't people helping my shitpost along?
You don't really get logic, do you?
Senior paper time. Do any of you have and sources about how America's foreign policy successfully combated communism during the Cold War?
> succesfully
>>2728527
What they did to try and contain it
>>2728503
https://www.mycity-military.com/Opste-vojne-teme/Jugoslavija-i-NATO-1951-1957.html
Want me to translate this for you?
The source used for that post is as follows:
Korišćeni tekst-
Isporuke naoružanja u okviru zapadne vojne pomoći od 1951 do 1957 u Jugoslaviji-Faktor modernizacije armije
Vojno-istorijski Glasnik 1-2/2001 ; strana 144 do 160.
Autor - Bojan Dimitrijević
Institut za savremenu istoriju Beograd
What's the best book on Roman history?
Plutarch
>>2728523
I'd prefer modern books.
>>2728492
~ Peter Heather
>The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History
What's a good documentary on the battlefield tactics in warfare and their evolution throughout time? Googling "warfare documentaries" is far too wide of a brush, as everything's about one specific war (and almost always recent ones lol)
Being on Netflix is definitely a plus but I don't necessarily it.
>>2728323
Oh, and it doesn't necessarily have to be about tactics; a focus on weapons/equipment is fine too
Something like that would have such an incredibly large scope that it would be impossible to go into any detail at all about anything
Sometimes tactics were unrecognisably different at the beginning and the end of a certain war, never mind the beginning and the end of that century or that millennium
>>2728323
Weapons and warfare in renaissance europe
Bert s hall
What are your thoughts on compatibilism, the idea that determinism and free will are both true? One argument is that way the final outcome is predetermined, the pathway is not, and that is free will.
So then, it would be predetermined that I think that Hope Estheim is best husbando, but not which exact image I would download for this thread, that I have free will to decide which.
So Determinism is likely false.
The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies things are genuinely random in the universe.
>but muh Bohmian mechanics and muh many world's interpretation
Bell's theorem shows that any deterministic theory that produces the same result as the QM necessitates that the hidden variables be nonlocal.
What this means is that causality would travel faster than light for these hidden variables.
This means either you could go back in time, and kill your grandfather etc.
Or it means that time doesn't actually exist in the first place, and the statistical physicists are right that time is merely an emergent property of entropy.
The former case is unlikely, because of the logical paradoxes associated with time travel. The latter case is more likely, but in this sense it no longer makes sense to think about causality at all, since your future self "causes" your present self.
>>2728270
i think free will is real in the way we feel as if we have a free will while determinism is also true because the human is a physical thing that cannot defy the principle of cause and consequence.
we feel like having a free will because we witness our own thought process (which is the actual "you"), while we are like a clockwork with molecule-sized gears
What peace treaty did Rudolf Hess offer the British?
Why did the British turn it down?
"Let's just go for a white peace and let us become a superpower kthanks"
"What the fuck no, that's retarded."
>>2728079
None because he had no authority to offer anything, and Hitler disowned him as soon as he realised he'd fled.
>>2728079
He didn't have one. The only people who claim he did, are crackpot stormniggers who offer no primary sources and not other sources other than German officers who were writing years later to save themselves from a Soviet firing squad or an anonymous informant who totally translated the peace treaty, but has no evidence he did so and has now died.
Was medieval Iceland an Anarcho-Capitalist society?
>>2728074
It is utterly asinine to conflate premodern societies with modern ideologies.
>>2728084
t. ideology is an inevitable progression to
communism
t. nationalism c-can't exist in ancient polities! MUH MARXIST HISTORIOGRAPHY SAYS NATIONALISM CUMS AFTER FEUDALISM!!! AFTER!!!!!!
t. premodern thought streams never influence modern society!
>>2728084
No slavery, means no capitalism.
How did it even happen exactly? Were Byzantines and Sassanids THAT incompetent when it came to military? Both these empires alone held enormous advantage in numbers over the early caliphate.
sudden, massive conquests aren't uncommon in history. What made this particular one important is the length of time it lasted
>>2728071
Three words.
Khalid ibn Walid
>>2728071
The Byzantines and Sassanids were fighting a war for centuries. By the end of it both nations were way too exhausted, especially the Sassanids who were on the brink of collapse after their wars. It wasn't that hard for the Arabs to take advantage of their situation.
Redpill me on Islam /his/. Why does it exist? What was the motivation behind it.
>>2727981
>Redpill me
Fuck off.
It exists because God gave Muhhamed his message and told him to share it.
>>2727981
Conquest, that's about it everything else propaganda.
How the fuck did the US lose the Vietnam War?
>>2727976
>lose
we just didn't try hard enough
>>2727976
Technically they didn't, but th short Answer ist Hippies,
They lobbied and protested against the whole thing and left millions of south Vietnamese left to rot in concentration camps. But at least they could smoke pot and stick flowers in gum barrels, that's worth the loses of Vietnamese lives
It was a proxy War to posture in front of the USSR.
If it was only as it is on the surface things would have been different.
What is the best books that tries to cover WW2 in general or other specific fronts?
>>2727944
"A War to be Won" by Murray and Millett
>>2727944
Antony beevors ww2 good place to start anon
While we're on it, I consider Storm of Steel, by Ernst Junger, to be the best book on WWI (simple, honest look at the reality of the war, from the perspective of a young officer on the front-line)
Is there anything similar for WWII? Everything seems to be political grand-standing or Anglo-centric accounts of minor involvement. I mean Eastern Front, daily life, firsthand accounts; the good, the bad and the ugly.
i found this n my garden today. wat's this ?
other photo : http://hizliresim.com/yEWjlk
edit : i'm livin in turkey
A shekel
>>2727863
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that it might be a coin of some kind.
>>2727863
Pretty obviously a coin...
the difficult part of it is determining when it was created. Since my knowledge about coin dating is non-existing I could only guess.
1. I don't notice any facial structures on the coin. My knowledge from coins of the Byzantine era in Turkey they were almost always depicting the head of the EMPRAH.
2. The material seems to be something pretty common in coins, so I fear you might be dealing with anything in the timespawn of +/- 2000 B.C to about whenever your government starting introducing a standardised monetary system. The lines drawn seem pretty amateuristic which suggests anything medieval or earlier, and since I don't think it is Byzantine you might have struck (not literally since the coin is made of shitty metal) gold here.
Was carving Africa up like a turkey a bad idea?
>>2727774
No, Inshallah.
Ethically, sure, but from a strategic standpoint no.
It depends on what you mean. Are you trying to bring attention to how it's a shithole now? That's primarily from poor decolonization. Are you trying to bring attention to the savagery and brutality inflicted on the natives by the Europeans? Then yes carving Africa up was a bad idea, but giving a false kingdom like Belgium a piece was the worst of the bad idea.
it was the best interest of the leaving colonizers to leave the them in shambles
an unstable and divided state is easier to deal with
imagine the face of european business if ukulele nwangi says no to bribe money
How did American society not see how shitty this is?
>>2727765
brainwashing and burgers
Most of them are manlets and can't see from that far up
>>2727818
It's shittiest from ground level.
Are nomadic people (or previously nomadic) inherently disdainful of hard workers in general?
>>2727744
>A nation is defined by an act of a single or small group of individuals
WEW THIS IS NEW LEVEL OF REDPILL POLBRO, KEKE
>>2727744
Are you implying nomads are *not* hard-working?
Checks out
>Tutsi looked down on the Hutu
>Maasai won't even eat vegetables because they're considered pleb food for farmers
>Tuareg consider blacksmiths a slave caste and won't even touch iron with their bare hands
Am interesting reversal was that the Greeks, Romans, and Jews considered it a point of pride to live on bread and milk and meat consumption to be hallmarks of lazy barbarian parasites