>Dragon-type.
>It has no wings.
>It has no frontal arms with long claws.
>It has no scales.
>It doesn't breath fire.
Kill yourself, Tajiri-san.
>>27487940
>>It doesn't breath fire.
but it does.
>>27487940
>Tajiri
he didn't even care anymore.
Blame the king of /vp/
>>27487940
>Dragon-type.
>It has no wings.
>It has no scales.
>It doesn't breath fire.
>Still no multi type cat
>Still no snowman
>Still no "rugby" monkey
>Still no fighting Abra
Come on GF
>>27487891
Ice types pls be nice. No bully.
In time probably.
The Fighting type Abra/Water Arcanine/etc leak only came out after today's trailer, so it's probably fake.
>he didn't believe the chinese leaks when it came out
even if it's not 100% accurate, always bet that many of it will come true
Let this be a lesson to you pokefags, when a company hires a third party (even as simple as localization) from China, Chinese speaking territory, or Chinese-based company, expect Chinese leaks.
>>27487845
I feel neutral is always the best option
Doesn't matter if its real or fake, you get to laugh at someone for being adamant about their side.
>>27487878
This. /Thread
>>27487878
>>27487889
still, it's refreshing to see a fandom of a game experiencing first time what is seemingly a regular on many games
though it does make you wonder why it took just now for Pokemon to branch out to Chinese territories
ITT: Pokemon Knockoff/ripoffs/imports.
so, were there lesbians in finding dory?
>>27487842
No, anon. Just because it's 2 women standing next to each other does not mean they are. It was confirmed 2 months ago, man.
>pick Charmander, Cyndaquil, Torchic, and Chimchar
>not a fan of Tepig and Fennekin
>get excited over Litten
>today's video basically confirmed the leak as true
>mfw
I just wanted Fire starters to be great again.
At first I blew it off as no big deal, but I genuinely feel sad about it.
I can slap an Everstone on it at least, but it'll never be at its best.
>>27487806
While I was a fan of Fennekin, I wasn't a fan of Delphox, so I feel your pain.
Maybe It'll grow on me, but if not, I'll be switching to the archer just as I switched to the snake and the frog.
>>27487806
Just pretend Salandit is the Fire starter. That's what I'm doing
>bullet punch
>mach punch
>>27487769
>New fishmon.
>keeping it in against a Pokemon with Bullet Punch
Just cause it has a weakness doesn't mean you have to play like a retard.
what's its pre-evo? does it need to adapt too? maybe one of its eggs will be unbroken?
>>27487715
It's just normal Exxegcute. It's in the trailer.
>>27487715
We already know its pre-evo remains the same way. NEXT
>>27487715
In the Japanese trailer, we see a normal Kanto-style Exxegcute evolve into the Alola form.
I'm guessing this means sometimes only the end of the evolution-line will get an Alola form.
Let's write a letter to John Gamefreak. Three letters at a time. I'll start:
Dear John Gamefreak
nothin personnel kid
>>27487593
Dragonite
Why did you ruin litten
Last thread hit image limit >>>27480067
Aside from the legendaries this is a very solid gen with only one truly awful design.
>>27487398
are you going to add the final evolution starters seeing how the recent news made them pretty much confirmed?
Recolor Thread
>>27487355
>>27487355
I just noticed they fucked up his arm positioning in that art, is the in game model ok though? Or did they somehow fuck that up too?
The black fire guy Kiawe is supposed to have a marowak as a partner.
Marowak is known for its bone club, so do you think its possible that marowak might gain a fire typing along with ground or just drop ground altogether. My reasoning is that knife dancing is a very popular part of Luau shows that the tourists like to go to.
https://youtu.be/MnFh-oup2Vk
>>27487279
Thaaaaaatd actually be kinda phat really
>>27487279
Could be that Fire/Grass we've been waiting for.
>>27487279
>Dancewak
>I'm so sad about my mom dying that will now perform you the dance of my people
Such a ridiculous idea that I'd love to see it happen.
why is it a dragon?
>>27487207
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dracaena_(plant)
because it has a long neck and they slapped a tail onto it
that's literally it.
why it wouldn't?
Open your eyes sheeple. It's the kid wearing the Vikavolt shirt all over again.
>>27487183
That's the Alola form Wobuffet, duck feet and antenna.
>My best bro Meganium getting a Mega
ALL HOPE IS RESTORED
>>27487290
Whoops, meant Quagsire.
>gen 5, the generation that force-fed you a bunch of story and human characters that you were supposed to care about, all while making you stick to a point-a-to-point-b linear path and only giving you their "hip" new gen 5 pokemon to use on your team, is loved on this board
>gen 6, the generation that brought the franchise's focus back to their namesake creatures by introducing new ways to interact with them such as Mega Evolution and Pokemon-Amie, as well as having an arsenal of over 300 pokemon from all generations for you to catch, all while sticking to a minimal and non-pretentious story so as not to distract you from the main focus of the game, is hated
Do you guys even like Pokemon?
Whats wrong about gen 5 pokemon?
>>27487200
I don't like them
>>27487169
Look, it's perfectly simple.
At any given time, the upcoming generation will be considered fantastic by some and dogshit by others. Just after it releases, everyone will be excited, though some will still complain.
The most recent prior release will be considered absolutely terrible and the worst entry in the series. Right now, that's Gen VI. But, when Gen VI was fresh, everyone hated Gen V. When Gen V was fresh, everyone hated Gen IV.
However, there's an additional level! The generation PRIOR to the most recent prior release will be beloved. People will discuss how unjust former opinions of it were. Right now, that's Gen V. But, when Gen V was hated, it was Gen IV. And so on.
I don't really care one way or the other since I'm still going to play the game regardless, but are people really that fucking retarded and gullible to believe these shitty starters are real just because some girl appeared in the lower right? And their only defense when you call them out on it is "B-But the girl was confirmed and she looks just like the one in the sketch!!! Y-youre a denial fag!!!!" I mean i know you're mad that these probably wont be 100% confirmed, but as a friendly anon, i expected better from you /vp/. For shame.
>>27487104
Ok.
>>27487104
You're kind of retarded, but I expected better of /vp/ as well.
This morning was filled with 12 year old /v/edditors shitposting left and right about dumb shit.