I don't really care one way or the other since I'm still going to play the game regardless, but are people really that fucking retarded and gullible to believe these shitty starters are real just because some girl appeared in the lower right? And their only defense when you call them out on it is "B-But the girl was confirmed and she looks just like the one in the sketch!!! Y-youre a denial fag!!!!" I mean i know you're mad that these probably wont be 100% confirmed, but as a friendly anon, i expected better from you /vp/. For shame.
>>27487104
Ok.
>>27487104
You're kind of retarded, but I expected better of /vp/ as well.
This morning was filled with 12 year old /v/edditors shitposting left and right about dumb shit.
>>27487104
It's not just Mallow though. It's Mallow and being mentioned in the leaks that so far have been right
>>27487104
>>27487104
you don't have a very firm grasp on what "logic" is or how it works do you?
>>27487104
MALLOWGATE IS REAL FAG
>>27487104
What are the odds that a fake piece of concept art perfectly replicates the Pokemon artstyle AND manages to predict the specific design of a main character in the game?
Compare those odds to the odds of this being a set of leaked starter evolution concept art, whichwe have gotten before.
>Denialfag still in denial.
Embrace your new starters my friend.