Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 569. page

its stew you fucking mongrel

File: BFJ_Salo_GroosMan.png (242KB, 500x283px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 500x283px

*eats your poop*

>>87227018
ur mom stewed my cock with her mouth last night fuccboi lmao

It's not though.

>>87226987
No.

I love it, but it's not.

>>87226987
The 1954 film absolutely not, the American cut is still good for sure but it's not as personal or as emotionally effective.

The American edits for 1984 & G2000 however are superior.
G2000 for just vastly superior sound & editing.
1984 for the added American music tracks being great & fitting with the original score seamlessly, for Burr returning adding nostalgia, for editing out a few shots that showed how poor the cyborg looked under the neck & most importantly for editing the missile collision scene monumentally more competently. Them making the Russians the bad guys was inconsequential to me.

File: 500px-NG3_07.jpg (46KB, 500x281px)

46KB, 500x281px

Post underrated criminal actors/actresses

File: big king.jpg (174KB, 470x706px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 470x706px

Wreckage Brother, get in here. We're telling plane stories.

>ywn save Hershlag

Is that the latest Malick flick? The dude is old and senile as fuck now, somebody needs to tell him to stop because it's hurting the credibility of his first two motion pictures when he keeps churning out garbage.

>>87226913
I find the statement in OP hard to generate any kind of constructive discussion.

>>87226867
neelix

>>87226867
Nog.

>>87226867
That britbong from ENT.

Why didn't they have a trial?

>>87226828
Because fairness and integrity were off the table.

>>87226828
>Sho I guess a fair trial is off the table eh?
>*winks at the camera*

File: -03-.jpg (30KB, 647x488px)

30KB, 647x488px

1st for based meatballs

File: 93838427-C9A8-4E09-AC90-49C1B0770828-11283-00000B69DBC39259.png (1008KB, 1743x972px) Image search: [Google]

1008KB, 1743x972px

>Paul is realizing josh might turn after how weird held been acting of not wanting to do his move this week (tie vote)
>after Jason leaves Paul will try to throw HoH to Alex who will be pissed Jason left and in the confusion get her to target josh
>Once josh leaves Paul will have Xmas, Alex, raven and Kevin all of whom don't like one another except they all like Paul and trust him
>Paul will have officially won the season at this point no question

File: 1495088951919 (1).jpg (31KB, 539x540px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 539x540px

>>87226723
>tfw wanted this to be SWAT 4 2.0.
It's still a very good game despite its flaws though.

>>87226723
well, Sicario is operator as fuck, but that reminds me more of ghost recon wildlands

https://youtu.be/OcGUIEz6SHA
literally Rainbow Six Siege: The Movie

>>87226640
seriously!? did you even watch the film?

>>87226640

Are you a teenager?

>>87226635
No.
I managed about 8 episodes.
I hated it.
It was so, so, so forced.

>>87226631

You can't. Let it die with dignity.

>>87226631
https://www.change.org/p/syfy-renew-dark-matter-for-season-4?recruiter=552090800&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition&utm_term=share_twitter_responsive


https://help.netflix.com/en/titlerequest

>>87226631
It was good as dead then the writers started the whole time travel BS. It also went bad then they can not even stay on a central theme.

>>87226628
>Dishonest

But what does that mean? I think dishonest is a dishonest criticism. You can't or won't say what you actually didn't like so you say dishonest. What are you accusing it of exactly?

quick rundown on dishonest filmmaking for newfriends:
(Tarantino, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Wes Anderson, Christopher Nolan, Alex Garland, Paul Thomas Anderson, Nicholas Refn, Tom Hooper, Tyler Perry, Rian Johnson, Alfonso Cuaron, Noah Baumbach, Andrea Arnold, David Yates, Denis Vilenueve, James Franco, Steve McQueen) are intellectually bankrupt moral whores and charlatans; their films appeal to the modern phenomenon of the 'Pretend Epic' or Pseudo Cinema, often tied to the criticism that "It was a movie that thought it was a film" they have no ideas of their own and are filmed purely to have fancy essays made about them. They obfuscate their lack of insight under a smug impenetrable irony and often contain scenes with disingenuous attempts at depth with characters spouting platitudes that the director takes VERY seriously.
This directly panders to the IMDb reddit sensibility of quote circlejerking since these hacks are masters of the fools wit, "Quipping" (Not to be confused with the marvel co-opting of the word) , it sounds smart, cool and worldly but in reality there's nothing of substance, the Revenant's attempt at spiritualism was cheap and laughable and whilst someone like Malick has considered his philosophy, Inaurritu wears his introspection on his sleeve to give his film a false sense of depth with pathetic sermonising.

THIS is Dishonest Filmmaking.
They leech the greater works that preceded them; like The Enemy being a rip off Eraserhead, but they have nothing else to say.
They act under the guise of deconstruction with surface layer obvious 'social commentary' and a quirky forgettable score praised as 'innovative'. They are all inauthentic sycophants that rely on oscar buzz and post 9/11 detachment for relevance

These directors are hacks and will be forgotten to time

Some notably earnest filmmakers include, but are not limited to
>Mike Leigh
>The Coen Brothers
>Werner Herzog
>James Cameron
>Mel Gibson
>Terrence Malick
>Gaspar Noe
>Clint Eastwood

>>87226628
There's nothing more honest than Refn out there. His movies feel empty because he is an autist, not because it's dishonest.
PTA on the other hand...